Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava)

Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

Grade the Milwaukee offseason

A
3
5%
A-
2
3%
B+
8
13%
B
15
25%
B-
8
13%
C+
7
12%
C
4
7%
C-
6
10%
D
5
8%
F
2
3%
 
Total votes: 60

HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,316
And1: 20,910
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#1 » by HartfordWhalers » Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:47 pm

Milwaukee Bucks Offseason Review

HartfordWhalers wrote:HartfordWhalers Review

Key Losses:
Jerryd Bayless

He shot 101/231 on 3's, and could be the nominal 'pg' while Giannis actually initiated. There is a value in that. However, health concerns, questionable defense and an age that is past the window of the rest of the team made his loss understandable.

Losses:
O.J. Mayo
Greivis Vasquez
Damien Inglis
Johnny O'Bryant

OJ Mayo was once traded for Kevin Love. Besides that, he has chronically underperformed and now is out of the league for quite a bit. Not good. The Grevis Vasquez trade was absolutely horrible the instant it happened, and seeing Vasquez leave for nothing might even add to that sentiment, if possible. On the other hand, Vasquez isn't anything special. Damien Inglis was a high 2nd rounder that obviously didn't develop.

Draft:
#10 Thon Maker
#36 Malcolm Brogdon
#38 traded to GSW

Well, I disliked this draft a lot. Thon did feel like a massive reach at #10, and based upon the age stuff on him I feel really bad about his development curve. WHo would I have rather seen go here? A trade. Besides that, they could have grabbed Malcolm Brogdon might turn out a solid pick, but I would have liked McCaw there as a perfect guy to play the Bayless role only with more size and defense. Or at #38.

Trades:
#38 Pat McCaw to GSW for $2.4m
Rights to Albert Miralles for Dellavedova S&T and 200k cash

Selling a pick there when they need to upgrade Ennis and replace Bayless/Mayo/Vasquez in the guard rotation (or roster) feels just a horrible move. And only getting 2.4m and no future 2nd feels really bad on value. This feels like one of the low key horrible trades that can get lost in the shuffle, but shouldn't. And in general that was the stance of people on here, with 70% finding it good only for GSW McCaw trade. What would have been better, besides getting fair market value? Patrick McCaw/Demetrius Jackson/Isaiah Whitehead/(Cornelie or Cordinier stashed) all made a world more sense.

Getting 200k cash to do a S&T for Dellavedova enabled Cleveland to take Dunleavy for free. (Which enabled Chicago to take Wade.) Apart from following the small waves from there, it is worth pointing out that the Bucks did 2 small trades, each helping GSW and CLE strengthen their benches in case league parity was becoming possible for next season. Well played Milwaukee.

Free Agency:
Jason Kidd (HC) to contract extension
Miles Plumlee 4/$50m
Matthew Dellavedova S&T 4y/$38.4m
Mirza Teletovic 3/$31.5m
Thon Maker rookie scale
Malcolm Brogdon 3/3m last year nongtd
Jason Terry 1 year vet min
Steve Novak 1 year vet min
J.J. O’Brien and Orlando Johnson 1 year nongtd deals

I'm not sold on Kidd long term all that much, especially if he gets any GM like controls. Think Doc RIvers. Novak and Terry move zero needles. Mirza might be a fit at backup pf, but Milwaukee just came into free agency with a bunch of money and a very questionable guard rotation besides only Middleton. They left free agency with a roster already over 100m, and a very questionable guard rotation besides only Middleton. Dellavedova might be an okay backup pg, and he might start.

But they didn't address the real needs, added to the log jam of expensive bigs that aren't great. I would be hard pressed to find too many less spectacular usage of 120m than Plumelee/Teletovic/Dellavedova (although Plumlee was with Bird Rights and not full cap space).

Current Depth Chart: (taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Michael Carter-Williams, Matthew Dellavedova, Jason Terry, Tyler Ennis
SG: Khris Middleton, Rashad Vaughn, Malcolm Brogdon, Orlando Johnson
SF: Giannis Antetokounmpo, Steve Novak, J.J. O’Brien
PF: Jabari Parker, Mirza Teletovic, Thon Maker
C: Greg Monroe, John Henson, Miles Plumlee

I moved Rashad Vaughn back to sg, as he isn't really a sf. And then Thon to pf. And then Terry to pg.
But regardless of where you put the guys, this depth chart looks razor thin.

Needs:
Defensive meshing with Monroe. Or a Monroe trade. John Hensen to look worth his contract. Or a Hensen trade. Miles Plumlee to look worth his contract. Or a Miles Plumlee trade. So, basically to sort the big man rotation.
Besides that? A competent starting pg (at least in name) to emerge from MCW, Dellavedova or trade.
A competent backup sg and backup sf.

Additional Thoughts:
The light at the end of the tunnel needs to be a trade. Things could get better if Monroe opts out next year, and there is some 15m to fix all the holes. But that 15m shouldn't go very far even then and that is letting MCW walk as a restricted free agent. Obviously there are a lot of scenarios where this gets worse next year. Jabari/Giannis will really need to look absolutely amazing going forward, and that feels like a lot of expectations to put on at least one of them.

Projected Win/Loss: 35-47 So, back to exactly the zone that the Bucks don't want to be stuck in.

Off-Season Grade: F I could have gone incomplete. Or a D. But there are no incompletes here, it is a judging of what has been done. Milwaukee hasn't done what they need to do, and what they have done I disliked a lot. That is an F.


bondom34 wrote:bondom34 Review

Key Losses:
None

Yeah, Bayless. Not a huge deal to me.

Losses:
O.J. Mayo
Greivis Vasquez
Damien Inglis
Johnny O'Bryant
Jerryd Bayless

Draft:
#10 Thon Maker
#36 Malcolm Brogdon
#38 traded to GSW

Wasn't a big fan of the Thon pick, but he looked good in Summer League. I guess its a wait and see thing. As for the age debate, I don't know what to make of it but am of the opinion if he's good it doesn't matter all that much.

Trades:
#38 Pat McCaw to GSW for $2.4m
Rights to Albert Miralles for Dellavedova S&T and 200k cash

Free Agency:
Jason Kidd (HC) to contract extension
Miles Plumlee 4/$50m
Matthew Dellavedova S&T 4y/$38.4m
Mirza Teletovic 3/$31.5m
Thon Maker rookie scale
Malcolm Brogdon 3/3m last year nongtd
Jason Terry 1 year vet min
Steve Novak 1 year vet min
J.J. O’Brien and Orlando Johnson 1 year nongtd deals

Delly was a good pickup for a good fit on this team. That's way too much money for a 3rd center in Plumlee and unless/until Monroe's gone, I don't like it. Solid deal for Teletovic as well, and the rest are end of bench vets/rookies/not that big. The Kidd extension's a show of faith, no problem there.

Current Depth Chart
PG: Michael Carter-Williams, Matthew Dellavedova, Tyler Ennis (I don't know who starts)
SG: Khris Middleton, Jason Terry, Malcolm Brogdon, Orlando Johnson
SF: Giannis Antetokounmpo, Rashad Vaughn, Steve Novak, J.J. O’Brien
PF: Jabari Parker, Mirza Teletovic
C: Greg Monroe, John Henson, Miles Plumlee, Thon Maker


Needs:
Development, and a Monroe trade. Just anywhere, but I'd think they really need to get that done if there's a taker. Maybe find a backup SG/SF combo or a PG upgrade.

Additional Thoughts:
Overall they disappointed last year, and I'm not sure what to expect this season. They could mesh and be back in the playoffs, or similar to last year. I'm thinking somewhere in between is about right, but could see them being higher. But I'm sure they're a great watch and with Giannis, Middleton, and Parker they look to have a pretty bright future.

Projected Win/Loss: 40-42

Off-Season Grade: B-


dbrandon wrote:dbrandon Review

Key Losses:
Jerryd Bayless

Bayless was a useful combo guard for the Bucks. He'll probably be missed a bit—I would have kept him over going for Terry. He's a solid player on both ends and can hit the 3, which is a useful thing to have around.

Losses:
O.J. Mayo
Greivis Vasquez
Damien Inglis
Johnny O'Bryant

How the mighty have fallen. OJ was the next big thing...now he's out for a "drug of abuse". Problems, man.

None of the rest of these guys are that useful. O'Bryant's probably worth someone taking a flier on, but that's about it.

Draft:
#10 Thon Maker
#36 Malcolm Brogdon
#38 traded to GSW

I kind of like both of these rookies. As most people do, I think Maker was probably overdrafted, and he's INCREDIBLY raw. But he's got a fantastic attitude and apparently works super hard, and I tend towards those guys over the low-motor high-potential prospects.

Trades:
#38 Pat McCaw to GSW for $2.4m
Rights to Albert Miralles for Dellavedova S&T and 200k cash

OK. Why would you trade away McCaw? I really like him—think he's going to be the kind of mistake that comes back and bites you.

Delly S&T will be touched on below.

Free Agency:
Jason Kidd (HC) to contract extension
Miles Plumlee 4/$50m
Matthew Dellavedova S&T 4y/$38.4m
Mirza Teletovic 3/$31.5m
Thon Maker rookie scale
Malcolm Brogdon 3/3m last year nongtd
Jason Terry 1 year vet min
Steve Novak 1 year vet min
J.J. O’Brien and Orlando Johnson 1 year nongtd deals

Kidd is a decent enough head coach, sure. I guess that's fine. I don't like him as a person that much, but w/e.

Plumlee hasn't shown enough to be worth near that amount of money. For real? His beard is good, I guess. But unless literally no one else wants to come, it feels like MIL was bidding against themselves.

I LOVE the Delly signing. He's been one of the better backup PGs, and unless you can get your hands on PatBev somehow, don't think there's another guy that fits as well next to Milwaukee's stable of big wings as a 3&D secondary ballhandler.

Mirza is a great signing too. One of the best guys at spreading the floor from PF.

Terry and Novak are both good vet signings. Terry probably still has a tiny bit left in the tank, but I hope not too much is expected of him.

The last two guys I don't know enough about to have an opinion either way.

Current Depth Chart: (taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Matthew Dellavedova, Michael Carter-Williams, Tyler Ennis
SG: Khris Middleton, Jason Terry, Malcolm Brogdon, Orlando Johnson
SF: Giannis Antetokounmpo, Rashad Vaughn, Steve Novak, J.J. O’Brien
PF: Jabari Parker, Mirza Teletovic
C: Greg Monroe, John Henson, Miles Plumlee, Thon Maker

I moved Delly to starter because I'd be shocked if he's not.

This roster really looks a little thin on the wing TBH. They've got to pray Terry has something left and/or Brogdon and Vaughn are ready to contribute.

Needs:
Giannis and Jabari need to take the next step. Giannis getting a little bit more consistency on his jumper would be great, and Parker being better defensively would help as well.

Wing depth. They're thin there. Terry and Vaughn are not going to cut it long-term.

Moving Monroe should be high on the priority list. Can Henson fill that spot? He's been a terrific rim protector in low minutes, but can he scale production up and contribute in other ways?

Additional Thoughts:
This is a young and very talented team. Can they put it together? IDK, but it'll be fun to watch.

Projected Win/Loss: 42 wins

Off-Season Grade: C


Slava wrote:Slava Review

Key Losses:
Jerryd Bayless

Bayless' departure would hurt even with the arrival of Dellavadova as their new options at combo guard include a 39 year old Terry and some unproven young players.

Losses:
O.J. Mayo
Greivis Vasquez
Damien Inglis
Johnny O'Bryant

Nothing really grievous here and you gotta wonder if this is the end for OJ Mayo's NBA career. Between bad conditioning, poor work ethic and a substance abuse issue, its hard to find a team that would give him a second look even 2 years from now, when he'll be 30.

Draft:
#10 Thon Maker
#36 Malcolm Brogdon
#38 traded to GSW

Maker is a risk not just because his age might be underreported but mostly because he is tremendously raw in terms of adapting to organised basketball despite his physical gifts. However MIlwaukee is one of two teams in the top 10 that could afford to take that risk, the other being Denver. If he works out, him and Giannis in the frontcourt would make for a nightmare of a match up problem. If not, well the Bucks might lose out on a rotational guard who might have addressed some immediate needs but I like that they took the risk and his summer league play was certainly encouraging.

Brogdon is a fundamentally strong guard who lacks the athleticism/burst to create his own shots at the NBA level and his questionable shot mechanics make translating his jumper, which he worked very hard over in college to the pros quite difficult. He has some craftiness while being a smart defender but I think they could have benefited investing in a back up PG prospect like GP2, Cousins or Jackson or a reserve SF like Zipser who have higher chance of finding a niche in the league.

Trades:
#38 Pat McCaw to GSW for $2.4m
Rights to Albert Miralles for Dellavedova S&T and 200k cash

I would have liked it better if they trumped the Jazz offer for George Hill with their pick as he can guard both guard positions and adds consistent spacing but Delly, a luxury tax casualty in Cleveland is a fine acquisition to play the off guard in line ups featuring either MCW or Giannis as the primary ball handlers.

Considering their weak swing man depth here, I'd have kept McCaw who has some raw potential as a combo guard on both ends but there's only so many players to develop at once so taking the cash seems understandable. I do however think they'll regret this if he fulfills his potential on the Warriors.

Free Agency:
Jason Kidd (HC) to contract extension
Miles Plumlee 4/$50m
Matthew Dellavedova S&T 4y/$38.4m
Mirza Teletovic 3/$31.5m
Thon Maker rookie scale
Malcolm Brogdon 3/3m last year nongtd
Jason Terry 1 year vet min
Steve Novak 1 year vet min
J.J. O’Brien and Orlando Johnson 1 year nongtd deals

So far so good for Kidd here, he hasn't picked a fight with the GM or ownership (yet) and he's not been afraid to experiment with line ups or challenging his players to adapt to new roles. Running Giannis at point seems exciting even if we don't have a full season's worth of evidence to know how feasible it might be in the longer run. As such its a well deserved extension to preserve continuity.

Teletovic is an established shooter who you can draw out of time out plays for in tight game situations and he is signed to a fair deal in the current market place. Given a choice between him and Ryan Anderson, I'd choose Teletovic 10/10 times as he is usually reliably healthy and less of a defensive culprit. So getting him for half the price and a year less in free agency is a nice move.

The Plumlee extension makes little sense. From what I read and understand they made him available for cheap last season around the trade deadline, while on his rookie deal and couldn't find a taker. So I'm not sure what changed between then and the summer that made them rethink he either fits in their plans or they could move him under a more expensive deal.

Current Depth Chart
PG: Matthew Dellavedova, Michael Carter Williams, Tyler Ennis
SG: Khris Middleton, Jason Terry, Malcolm Brogdon, Orlando Johnson
SF: Giannis Antetokounmpo, Rashad Vaughn, Steve Novak, J.J. O’Brien
PF: Jabari Parker, Mirza Teletovic
C: John Henson, Greg Monroe, Miles Plumlee, Thon Maker

I'm going to go ahead and assume that Delly starts here as the nominal PG with Giannis being the primary ball handler and they run a second unit loaded with shooting to make things easier for MCW. As such the swing man depth is pretty weak here, so they might want to address this in the trade market or may be Ray Allen might indeed become a possibility.

Needs:
1. Better health and development from Jabari Parker.
2. Finding a consistent defensive unit that doesn't handicap the offense.
3. Acquiring swing man depth through trade, preferably including one of the misfits on the roster in MCW/Monroe.

Additional Thoughts:
Milwaukee took a step back last season, especially defensively while struggling with injuries and inconsistency. They start approaching Giannis' extension time this season and Parker is up for one soon so its time they get a better read on what they have on their hands.

The addition of proven shooting is going to smoothen a lot of creases in the offense but while there is a lot of versatility here, there's not much proven elite talent outside of Middleton and Giannis. I actually had to do a triple take to see where the money is going when I saw a $101M payroll while arguably their 3 best players are either on rookie or below market deals. A Giannis max extension coupled with Monroe picking up his player option could make money very tight here and it would be awkward if they have to pay luxury tax to keep a non-playoff team together next summer.

PS: If Chicago's season goes tits up with an untimely Wade injury and Jabari Parker plays up his value, I'd want the Bucks to explore a deal for Jimmy Butler.

Projected Win/Loss: 37-45

Off-Season Grade: B-
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,521
And1: 6,859
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#2 » by Andre Roberstan » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:08 pm

Apparently I'm way higher than HW on Teletovic.

Also worth noting—apparently MIL almost pulled off a Monroe deal with the Pelicans, which would likely have included at least someone who could help on the wing.
Image
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,247
And1: 97,961
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#3 » by Texas Chuck » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:09 pm

I don't mind Delly. But rather than geting cute and trying for Giannis 2.0 why didn't you get into the Atlanta/Indy/Utah deal and steal George Hill for yourselves who would have been absolutely perfect? Heck make that deal and then still sign Delly. Or use that pick to upgrade the center position instead of having $50M invested annually and 3 backup centers? And I know GSW worked with Bogut to send him where he wanted to go, but what if you offered GSW a little bit of value? Bring Bogut home would have been perfect--and who knows--then maybe you could dump Monroe on a desperate Dallas. Just feels like some missed opportunities that made a lot more sense.

Now they just need to turn Monroe into any kind of wing who can play.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 29,092
And1: 9,735
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#4 » by crkone » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:18 pm

All 3 of Middleton, Giannis, and Parker can play the 3. So I imagine many lineups with Dellavedova and MCW playing together with one of those 3, Teletovic, and [insert big]. Vaughn and Brogdon, or Terry, will have to cover the rest of the backup wing minutes. I'm wondering if the Bucks trade Henson before Monroe and clear some long term salary. The season will depend on the defense though.

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,440
And1: 9,800
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#5 » by M-C-G » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:24 pm

I think these are some pretty good takes overall, you guys cover a wide range of opinions. A couple things to note, which I don't think any of you touched on.

1. Our GM has a long history with "over compensating" ...I'm not talking about his junk, but what we lack one season, he uses the draft and FA to address...it used to be athleticism, then it was length and now it is shooting and leadership. Kidd made the mistake of last season thinking the young guys didn't need Dudley, Zaza, etc. And it left an enormous gap of leadership and character (instead of movie nights at Dudleys, it was strip club at 5 am on a game day). Brog Dog and Thon (age issues aside) are some hard working, high character dudes that will help fill that gap Zaza and Duds left behind. Additionally Mirza and Delly give you more of the same. And all 4 of those guys can shoot the three.

2. The back up wing definitely seems thin. I think we are going to cover it with minutes from Parker, Middleton and maybe even Mirza or Brog Dog for spells. Speaking of Brogdon, I really believe he is going to be in the rotation from early on. The team loves him, I was at the draft party and some Bucks employees were raving about him and his work out, and his character before we even drafted him. I would definitely look to move Moose, find a way to get back Ariza, even if you have to take on Brewer and then sign Prince Ibeh as your third center. It'd balance the roster so nicely.

3. The selling of the 2nd round pick was inexcusable. In a market where you don't get your choice of FA (even though it has gotten way better under Kidd) and when you are going to be giving your young stars massive extensions, cost controlled players should never be ignored. Stashing a player to keep the roster spot open would have been fine, and there were some excellent stash options out there. While I like the Jason Terry signing, a guy like McCaw (or Norman Powell the year before) would have been much better options long term. This move was bush league, short sighted and makes no sense to me, doubly so when we are seeing guys like McCaw and Powell look like players.

4. The biggest takeaway I had was that our team knows our core, and whereas last year we were in talent acquisition mode, even if it didn't fit, this offseason was all about surrounding our core with the pieces that fit them. So yeah, Plum is an overpay but was excellent with our core. Henson also is a guy we will need to because he is the only rim protector on the roster, which will be important. If Moose stays, he has to lead that second unit, surround him with MCW, Brogdon, maybe Giannis and Mirza...at least three plus defenders and a shooter or two. Let him get his numbers, beat up back centers and have a career year and part ways next offseason.

5. Lastly, Thon. I was in the Skal camp, and frankly pretty stoutly against the idea of Thon (another guy that was being talked up to no end at the Bucks draft party, before we drafted him). But I have been impressed with the motor, the shooting range and the character (again, age thing aside). I don't know that he will be a special player, but I get why we took him there. Stretch 5 with rim protection is a beautiful thing. Will be interesting to see how quickly he can find a role, but I would guess we don't see much PT for him this season.

Nice work guys.
guille_4
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,899
And1: 846
Joined: Aug 22, 2010
   

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#6 » by guille_4 » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:42 pm

dbrandon wrote:Apparently I'm way higher than HW on Teletovic.

Also worth noting—apparently MIL almost pulled off a Monroe deal with the Pelicans, which would likely have included at least someone who could help on the wing.


Thanks for the offseason reviews, I really enjoy reading them.

Just wanted to point out one thing that bothers me about the structure of the post. I think the data from the losses, trades, free agency and current depth chart should be at the beginning, separately from each of your reviews. They take up an awful lot of space and feel totally unnecessary to repeat them three times.

I'd like you guys to give it some thought, I think it'd improve the posts. Other than that, keep up the great work!
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,883
And1: 14,822
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#7 » by tiderulz » Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:59 pm

M-C-G wrote: Brog Dog and Thon (age issues aside) are some hard working, high character dudes

5. Lastly, Thon. I was in the Skal camp, and frankly pretty stoutly against the idea of Thon (another guy that was being talked up to no end at the Bucks draft party, before we drafted him). But I have been impressed with the motor, the shooting range and the character (again, age thing aside). I don't know that he will be a special player, but I get why we took him there. Stretch 5 with rim protection is a beautiful thing. Will be interesting to see how quickly he can find a role, but I would guess we don't see much PT for him this season.

Nice work guys.


i havent heard the latest, so i give a little benefit of the doubt. But if a player is complicit in pretending to be a different age for draft purposes, i cant call that player a "high character dude". that said, even if he is say 23 instead of 19, if he is good enough to play, Milwaukee will have him for his prime
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,521
And1: 6,859
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#8 » by Andre Roberstan » Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:19 pm

tiderulz wrote:i havent heard the latest, so i give a little benefit of the doubt. But if a player is complicit in pretending to be a different age for draft purposes, i cant call that player a "high character dude". that said, even if he is say 23 instead of 19, if he is good enough to play, Milwaukee will have him for his prime


I thought all that age stuff had been laid to rest.
Image
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,440
And1: 9,800
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#9 » by M-C-G » Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:45 pm

dbrandon wrote:
tiderulz wrote:i havent heard the latest, so i give a little benefit of the doubt. But if a player is complicit in pretending to be a different age for draft purposes, i cant call that player a "high character dude". that said, even if he is say 23 instead of 19, if he is good enough to play, Milwaukee will have him for his prime


I thought all that age stuff had been laid to rest.


Don't really feel like rehashing the age thing, so if you believe that he knowingly is misrepresenting his age, feel free to just insert "high work ethic and motor, plus seems like a very good guy, committed to winning, team orientated and quite coachable"
User avatar
ZeppelinPage
Head Coach
Posts: 6,418
And1: 3,386
Joined: Jun 26, 2008
 

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#10 » by ZeppelinPage » Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:58 pm

Giving them an F seems to be going a little overboard, considering they finally got some shooters for spacing in exchange for their worst players (O'Bryant, Inglis, Mayo and Vasquez).

The fact that those 4 are gone and the majority of minutes are going to Dellavedova and Teletovic is huge, if Vaughn gets better at shooting that would also help quite a bit. If he doesn't, he won't play much -- considering that is all he has to offer at this point. He was a bottom 5 player in the league last year, him getting less minutes would be an upgrade in itself.
giberish
RealGM
Posts: 17,321
And1: 7,081
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Location: Whereever you go - there you are

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#11 » by giberish » Mon Sep 12, 2016 7:01 pm

Along with Philly, they seem to have just assumed that centers would always have high trade value and have been 'stuck' with and extra rotation center and no trade market (without taking another big/long contract center back in return).

The Plumlee deal was surprising. They should have realized (from trying to trade Monroe) that the center position was pretty full around the league so they didn't need to pay that much for a decent enough rotation center who isn't a real impact player.

The Delladova and Teleovic signings will help. Delly's an acceptable starter (I'd say in the 20-25 range league-wide) and Teletovic is a good 3rd forward. They should be improved from last year, thought they'll need Parker to improve a bunch (especially on defense) to be on the track people were talking about last summer.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#12 » by loserX » Mon Sep 12, 2016 7:31 pm

Best move: signing Teletovic. It's a bunch of money, but Mirza played pretty well last year, and this move addressed one of the Bucks' greatest needs: anyone other than Kris Middleton being able to shoot. Liked the Brogdon pick also.

Worst move: the money they gave Plumlee, *especially* with Monroe still on the team. I thought it was way too much for Plumlee even in a vacuum, but it utterly destroyed any leverage the Bucks might have had while they try to trade Monroe. If they can't find a deal for Moose, they've got a kajillion bucks being spent on their third string C. I also thought Delly was a bit overpaid, but he was RFA so that's excusable.

If Kidd is serious about the Point Giannis experiment, then finding wing (off-ball) depth is even more of an issue. If he isn't, then one of MCW and Dellavedova is going to have to prove they can start as a ball-handler full-time.

Clearly there is work to be done, starting by unscrewing the centre rotation (and where is Maker supposed to play?). Thought some moves were okay, others were not good. Will go with a C, fittingly enough.
User avatar
raferfenix
RealGM
Posts: 23,962
And1: 4,333
Joined: Apr 05, 2003

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#13 » by raferfenix » Mon Sep 12, 2016 7:46 pm

Appreciate the coverage in these reviews!

Part of where I'm more optimistic than some here is that Thon's summer league performance took me aback.

If he's the real deal the Bucks might have the next Serge Ibaka on our hands (who also has his age questions) if not better. And Milwaukee's offseason as a whole improves dramatically if so.

Towards these ends, for all of Hammond's many faults, he does have a track record of recognizing young players who have superstar level potential. Aside from Giannis, Hammond is credited with running a crucial Kevin Garnett workout that "solidified his standing as a lottery pick."

http://www.weei.com/sports/boston/basketball/celtics/dan-guttenplan/2013/03/15/remembering-workout-sent-kevin-garnett-hi

Another reason for my more positive outlook is that I view Delly and Telly as perfect fits on fair contracts. We badly need both their shooting, and I could see Dellevadova in particular thriving next to Giannis and under Kidd.

Plumlee also showed some serious flashes for how he complimented Point Giannis and Jabari at the end of the season. Think he'll start for us out of the gate.

Where I'm most critical of our offseason is that we still appear to be setting up Monroe and MCW to be significant contributors. I could maybe see one of them working well off the bench flanked by shooters if they'd accept the role. But not both -- especially with them heading into free agency.

Whether or not we keep Monroe I'm also not sure if John Henson will be a long term fit in Milwaukee either.

Could see his trade value exceeding his value to the team -- particularly if Thon can step in as another long skinny defensive minded athlete to log 3rd string center minutes.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,362
And1: 29,044
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#14 » by Ron Swanson » Mon Sep 12, 2016 7:55 pm

The only move I feel hurts our long term grade is the Plumlee extension. He fits well and provides a need, but there were much cheaper avenues to go there. Otherwise, I love the draft selections and the Delly/Teletovic signings.

- Nothin annoys me more than when non-contender teams go the "safe route" with a top 10 pick. I love going for the home-run swing on Maker. If he hits then you have one of the most freakish/versatile starting fives in the league with shooting, athleticism, and defense.

- Adding Dellevadova, Teletovic, and Terry as rotation players addresses the biggest issue this team had last year in shooting.

- Brogdon is about as safe a bet to provide an NBA-ready role from day 1 out of any of the 2nd round prospects.

This team is only going as far as the progression of Giannis/Jabari, and to a lesser extent, Middleton. Which is why the contracts handed out indicate that they're in Year 1 of a 4-year window to determine how far this core can get you. I think too many people grade the moves in a vacuum and don't take into account what each team's situation is, and the reasons they project to be better next year. If the Nets made these same offseason moves, it would have a decisively lower grade. But for a team that should still be prioritizing growth and talent accumulation? These supplementary moves make a lot more sense in the grand scheme of things.

Offseason grade: B-

Long term outlook grade: B+
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,440
And1: 9,800
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#15 » by M-C-G » Mon Sep 12, 2016 8:00 pm

loserX wrote:Best move: signing Teletovic. It's a bunch of money, but Mirza played pretty well last year, and this move addressed one of the Bucks' greatest needs: anyone other than Kris Middleton being able to shoot. Liked the Brogdon pick also.

Worst move: the money they gave Plumlee, *especially* with Monroe still on the team. I thought it was way too much for Plumlee even in a vacuum, but it utterly destroyed any leverage the Bucks might have had while they try to trade Monroe. If they can't find a deal for Moose, they've got a kajillion bucks being spent on their third string C. I also thought Delly was a bit overpaid, but he was RFA so that's excusable.

If Kidd is serious about the Point Giannis experiment, then finding wing (off-ball) depth is even more of an issue. If he isn't, then one of MCW and Dellavedova is going to have to prove they can start as a ball-handler full-time.

Clearly there is work to be done, starting by unscrewing the centre rotation (and where is Maker supposed to play?). Thought some moves were okay, others were not good. Will go with a C, fittingly enough.


I agree we played the hand all wrong. I think the issue is they realize how well he fit with the core when given a chance to actually play and in their "find and keep people that fit" mantra off season, they knew they wanted him around. By one account Plumlee was not happy to be here after they signed Moose and I think was threatening to play out the QO. At least if that was really the case, you can kind of, if you squint, see why they did it.

One thing is certain, we wanted shooting to pair with the core, and we added Brogdon 39% in college, Thon (looks like he will be decent there), Terry (38% career 3pt%), resigned Novak (43% career), Mirza (obliterated the 3pt made for reserve record), Dova (40% career) and our replacing Mayo (32% last year), Vasquez (useless last year), Inglis (never got on the court), Bayless (shot above his head last year but was great other than being a douche) and Johnny O'Bryant (did he even shoot a three his whole career?).
Mystical Apples
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 06, 2015
 

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#16 » by Mystical Apples » Mon Sep 12, 2016 8:14 pm

I kinda feel like the Bucks will be shuffling fringe deck chairs until Jabari is moved. And yes I get he's young, kinda local-ish and considered untradeable but he'll never be ideal next to Giannis. Exhausting resources and churning assets elsewhere to make it functional isn't worth it.

I liked the Delly signing, a lot actually. Teletovic was fine but he's too old and will regress. Overall though MIL's off season should be graded on what they didn't do.

C-
geometry
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,849
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#17 » by Colbinii » Mon Sep 12, 2016 8:29 pm

I voted a B+, perhaps a little too high, but I really like what they did this off-season. #10 in this draft was a crab-shoot, but they took a high motor guy with some potential that has a decent floor.
I like Delly, Telly, and Jelly (jk, but I do enjoy jam on toast).
User avatar
Prez
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,162
And1: 44,218
Joined: Jan 26, 2015
 

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#18 » by Prez » Mon Sep 12, 2016 9:53 pm

Mystical Apples wrote:I kinda feel like the Bucks will be shuffling fringe deck chairs until Jabari is moved. And yes I get he's young, kinda local-ish and considered untradeable but he'll never be ideal next to Giannis. Exhausting resources and churning assets elsewhere to make it functional isn't worth it.

I liked the Delly signing, a lot actually. Teletovic was fine but he's too old and will regress. Overall though MIL's off season should be graded on what they didn't do.

C-

This keeps being said and it just isn't true. Outside of maybe Middleton, Jabari is probably the player on the roster who fits next to Giannis the best. I'm fairly confident Jabari will be a good shooter in time, likely as soon as this season when Kidd gives him the green light and he gets more game reps, and when he does the fit with that duo will be damn near seamless. Midds-Jabari-Giannis at the 2-3-4 (in that specific order) with a shooter/defender at PG and an athletic hustle center have been some of the most promising lineups for us. They work well together.
Mystical Apples
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 06, 2015
 

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#19 » by Mystical Apples » Mon Sep 12, 2016 10:39 pm

Milbuck wrote:
Mystical Apples wrote:I kinda feel like the Bucks will be shuffling fringe deck chairs until Jabari is moved. And yes I get he's young, kinda local-ish and considered untradeable but he'll never be ideal next to Giannis. Exhausting resources and churning assets elsewhere to make it functional isn't worth it.

I liked the Delly signing, a lot actually. Teletovic was fine but he's too old and will regress. Overall though MIL's off season should be graded on what they didn't do.

C-

This keeps being said and it just isn't true. Outside of maybe Middleton, Jabari is probably the player on the roster who fits next to Giannis the best. I'm fairly confident Jabari will be a good shooter in time, likely as soon as this season when Kidd gives him the green light and he gets more game reps, and when he does the fit with that duo will be damn near seamless. Midds-Jabari-Giannis at the 2-3-4 (in that specific order) with a shooter/defender at PG and an athletic hustle center have been some of the most promising lineups for us. They work well together.


I can't agree that a bottom 2 percentile forward in C&S and Pull Ups is optimal next to Giannis.

Delly should fit nicely, however, and KM is of course perfect. I'd bank on Delly-Middleton-Giannis-Teletovic forming MIL's best 4-man group next season.
geometry
LuessiT
RealGM
Posts: 11,475
And1: 4,735
Joined: Jan 08, 2016
 

Re: Milwaukee early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#20 » by LuessiT » Mon Sep 12, 2016 10:41 pm

Milbuck wrote:
Mystical Apples wrote:I kinda feel like the Bucks will be shuffling fringe deck chairs until Jabari is moved. And yes I get he's young, kinda local-ish and considered untradeable but he'll never be ideal next to Giannis. Exhausting resources and churning assets elsewhere to make it functional isn't worth it.

I liked the Delly signing, a lot actually. Teletovic was fine but he's too old and will regress. Overall though MIL's off season should be graded on what they didn't do.

C-

This keeps being said and it just isn't true. Outside of maybe Middleton, Jabari is probably the player on the roster who fits next to Giannis the best. I'm fairly confident Jabari will be a good shooter in time, likely as soon as this season when Kidd gives him the green light and he gets more game reps, and when he does the fit with that duo will be damn near seamless. Midds-Jabari-Giannis at the 2-3-4 (in that specific order) with a shooter/defender at PG and an athletic hustle center have been some of the most promising lineups for us. They work well together.


I think the major misunderstanding with fit issues comes from listing Giannis as a 3 and Jabari as a 4 on defense. Post ASB Jabari exclusively defended wings (with decent enough sucess to make me believe that he can turn out to be a neutral defender) and Giannis has been protecting the paint. Furthermore, it seems that Jabari has slimmed down during offseason solidifying my claim that Jabari should be exclusively considered a SF.
As Milbuck mentioned, Jabari and Giannis mesh well on offense and that should only increase further with both improving their range.

Return to Trades and Transactions