Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows)

Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

Grade the Boston offseason

A
2
5%
A-
13
33%
B+
7
18%
B
7
18%
B-
5
13%
C+
0
No votes
C
2
5%
C-
1
3%
D
0
No votes
F
2
5%
 
Total votes: 39

HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,316
And1: 20,910
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#1 » by HartfordWhalers » Wed Sep 21, 2016 11:15 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:HartfordWhalers Review

Key Losses:
Jared Sullinger
Evan Turner

Feels weird that Sullinger is gone getting paid less elsewhere than Zeller got to stay, but when you go to Horford from Sullinger, it is never a bad thing. That said, as an rfa who Boston had matching rights on, he was an asset, if a marginal one, and one which brought back nothing.

Turner I will always find an interesting NBA player. He can definitely morph into an Iguodala like presence if his game continues growing, but it is also pretty clear his game isn't yet matched to the price tag Portland paid. Boston had no choice here but to shrug and wave goodbye.

Losses:
John Holland
rights to Colton Iverson

John Holland didn't make it to the roster crunch. Colton Iverson is part of the slew of guys realizing that having their rights held exclusively by a singe NBA team isn't really that great of a deal.

Draft:
#3 Jaylen Brown
#16 Guerschon Yabusele (stashed)
#23 Ante Žižić (stashed)
#31 traded
#35 traded
#45 Demetrius Jackson
#51 Ben Bentil
#58 Abdel Nader (stashed)

Oh boy.

So, I hated this draft. They reached on Jaylen Brown, who I would have had 6th at best. And you cannot sell me on the fit either, he should be behind Crowder so its not like it was a pressing need of a backup sf that you must draft for fit. If the Celtics wanted the most long term upside, I think they should have gone for Murray or Bender. If the Celtics wanted win now production, Dunn. Jaylen Brown gives athleticism, but that alone does not make a guy a great prospect. Even if you think statistical models are getting overrated nowadays, the fact that Brown looked horrific in pretty much all of them has to give you pause. I hated this pick.

Yabusele is also highly questionable. Boston is not stashing a #16 pick. They are stashing Yabusele. Is that worth a pick at #16? I'm not sold it was at all, and that there wasn't significant value lost. Honestly, I would like this draft better if they had taken Zizic at #16, and then stashed Korkmaz at #23. Or taken Skal at #23, because that makes sense and if you cut Mickey, you end up cutting Mickey. They could have used 1 roster spot for a second 1st rounder. But Ante Žižić stash seems fine at #23.

Trading #31 instead of taking Zubac seems inherently wrong. Then again, I look at the Celtics and think they should have another center, so either him or Davis would have made sense. The value of the trade was fine, but with #35 even getting a guy who would be stashed, it just feels the one wrong time to do that trade.

I have no idea why Jackson fell to #45, but Boston had to do that pick on value. However, they need to figure it out now. Bentil instead of stashing Petr Cornelie (taken 2 picks later) seems a bad decision.

So, basically I think the Celtics reached for a guy in the range you shouldn't (top 5), didn't trade a pick when they should have traded it/done anything different than reaching for a stash, traded when they shouldn't, drafted fine, and then didn't stash when they should.

The Celtics draft was absolutely perfect for backseat drivers/Monday morning quarterbacks, and I would have changed pretty close to everything they did.

Trades:
#31 (Deyonta Davis) and #35th Rade Zagorac to Memphis Grizzlies for a 2019 LAC 1st (lotto protected)

On the surface a solid trade. I like the value in a vacuum until I look too closely: #31 and #35 for what is maybe #25 in 3 years but could be as good as #15 or as bad as 2 2nds? Especially with some falling prospects, it actually isn't a move you make unless you are completely panicked about roster spots.

How did the TnT board feel about the trade when it happened? 65% voted Memphis straight up won, 23% both won, and 10% said Boston. That distribution seems about right and suggests it wasn't a stellar deal for the Celtics, although Boston obviously was boxed in a bit with roster slots.

Free Agency:
Danny Ainge (GM) contract extension
Brad Stevens (Head Coach) contract extension
Al Horford 4/$113.3m (last year PO)
Tyler Zeller 2/$16m (last year ungtd)
Gerald Green 1/$1.4 m
Jaylen Brown rookie scale
Demetrius Jackson 4/$5.5m (2m gtd -- 1st year and hlf of 2nd year, last year TO)
Ben Bentil 3/$2.5m (250k gtd only)
Marcus Georges-Hunt 1year min (25k gtd only)
Jalen Jones and Damion Lee 1 year min most likely ungtd all or close

Love the coach extension. Good with the Ainge extension. Keeping what they have going is key, and the extensions do that from a management perspective.

Horford was the big hit. I love Horford as a player, and think the Boston system will be perfect for him. I'm really not concerned with his age or the money involved, although understand that some might be. Especially when you look at something like his rebounding numbers. Okay, maybe I am concerned. Having a strong, good rebounding 2nd big next to Horford would seem really important. Someone like Sullinger for instance would have been interesting.

The very strong Durant pitch was nice, and hopefully can roll over into a strong push for free agents next summer. But I'm not sure how muchI really want to give credit for Durant kinda liked us. At the end of the day, what is that actually worth? The next batchof free agents will need to be won over based upon their preferences.

Besides that? Green seems like an iffy choice for your only vet min import, but maybe I'm wrong. Rolling over Zeller as a trade matching piece is fine, and maybe he proves worth the 2nd year like Amir and Jerebko did.

Current Depth Chart: (taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Isaiah Thomas, Terry Rozier, Demetrius Jackson
SG: Avery Bradley, Marcus Smart, R.J. Hunter, Marcus Georges-Hunt
SF: Jae Crowder, Jaylen Brown, Gerald Green, James Young
PF: Amir Johnson, Jonas Jerebko, Jordan Mickey, Ben Bentil
C: Al Horford, Kelly Olynyk, Tyler Zeller

I moved Smart to backup sg, and Green to 3rd string sf. If Green is getting more minutes than Jaylen Brown there are going to be a lot of unhappy Celtic fans.

Needs:
The roster needs trades just to trim the edges. The team needs a superstar.

I don't have a ton of faith in Olynyk/Zeller/Jerebko as the 3rd-5th big, so I would like to see an upgrade there, but Olynyk could look really good as a floor spacer so I do hold off some hope there. I actually would like to see Boston shake loose from their maximum flexibility and try and sign Olynyk if they can get him locked in cheapish on an extension.

Is Terry Rozier a stud pg prospect who just needs minutes to show it? If so, Jackson is in for a rough time ever seeing any action but the hype might have run a little far on Rozier, we will see.

Additional Thoughts:
Thank goodness for the Nets and Billy King.

Also the deals not done.
Butler
Noel, Covington, #24and #26 for #3.

For Butler the trade rumors never pegged down exactly what would have done the deal, just that it might have taken one or both of Bradley/Crowder and one or both of the Nets picks, and not one of each at all. Without a clear offer on the table that Chicago would have said yes to, it is hard to say what Boston should have done here. But Butler would look pretty good on Boston. However, before Horford the team need was much more clearer at the bigs.

For the Philly offer, Boston's roster crunch would have made that deal very hard to do. Still, Noel would have been an amazing fit, an athletic big that is a defensive standout, has mobility, and can dunk lobs all day off guard penetration would be amazing with IT driving. Covington would have been a really great backup sf (and eat into Jerebko's backup pf minutes), and #26 stashing Korkmaz for instance would have been doable. Compared to taking Brown, I think the trade was a better offer. However, I feel like Boston's end game here is Cousins at the trade deadline or next offseason, and hopefully Jaylen Brown is a better piece in that trade (Sac has WCS already and Noel and him might have played together in college, but that doesn't mean they would be a good pairing in the NBA.) So, looked at from that perspectve I get it completely.

But Boston could really use a Cousins trade, and unleashing a Horford Cousins front court on the league.

Projected Win/Loss: 50-32

Off-Season Grade: B+ This grade would bug me regardless of what I wrote. Is it a great offseason that saw a stud Horford signed, Durant almost signed and tons of positive momentum towards the next move? Or is it an offseason which saw a bunch of draft assets depreciate instantly with questionable decisions, a roster that will soon cut some youths just for roster spots as is, and the only takeaway is an aging oft injured big that is best as a 2nd or even 3rd banana and is getting crazy money for 4 years? I feel like it feels like an A-, but was really more like a C+/B- when you look closely. As long as you were your protective glasses, everything in Oz is green and amazing, so this one is a B+.


bondom34 wrote:bondom34 Review

Key Losses:
Jared Sullinger
Evan Turner

Losses:
John Holland
rights to Colton Iverson

Draft:
#3 Jaylen Brown
#16 Guerschon Yabusele (stashed)
#23 Ante Žižić (stashed)
#31 traded
#35 traded
#45 Demetrius Jackson
#51 Ben Bentil
#58 Abdel Nader (stashed)

I'm going to be honest, I didn't love the draft. I think Brown was a worse prospect than at least Dunn, and they should have either taken and kept Dunn or traded him. Also, they're getting to a point where they're just having to take guys with the sole purpose of stashing them. Yabusele looked good in summer league, other than that I don't know if there's a difference maker anywhere here and they had to trade 2 picks for a future pick just to get rid of one.

Trades:
#31 (Deyonta Davis) and #35th Rade Zagorac to Memphis Grizzlies for a 2019 LAC 1st (lotto protected)

Free Agency:
Danny Ainge (GM) contract extension
Brad Stevens (Head Coach) contract extension
Al Horford 4/$113.3m (last year PO)
Tyler Zeller 2/$16m (last year ungtd)
Gerald Green 1/$1.4 m
Jaylen Brown rookie scale
Demetrius Jackson 4/$5.5m (2m gtd -- 1st year and hlf of 2nd year, last year TO)
Ben Bentil 3/$2.5m (250k gtd only)
Marcus Georges-Hunt 1year min (25k gtd only)
Jalen Jones and Damion Lee 1 year min most likely ungtd all or close

Now here on the other hand, they nailed it. Got the second best guy on the market in Horford. Extended a good coach. Green is a fine low salary pickup for the bench. Zeller's deal was cheap and has a year unguaranteed. Really there's not a thing here not done well.

Current Depth Chart: (taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Isaiah Thomas, Marcus Smart, Terry Rozier, Demetrius Jackson
SG: Avery Bradley, Gerald Green, R.J. Hunter, Marcus Georges-Hunt
SF: Jae Crowder, Jaylen Brown, James Young
PF: Amir Johnson, Jonas Jerebko, Jordan Mickey, Ben Bentil
C: Al Horford, Kelly Olynyk, Tyler Zeller

Needs:
Consolidation and probably a true star. They look solid all around, but could really use a single go to guy.

Additional Thoughts:
At this point, they had a pretty awesome offseason. Not perfect (see grade below) but darn near it. They really do need a consolidation soon though. One of the Brooklyn picks will likely be traded in my opinion this year, as they've gotta do something before everyone's contract runs up. IT/Bradley will be expirings in a year, and Smart/Olynyk due extensions. To add, Horford is 30 and not getting younger and they'll have I think 24 guys if they keep all the picks in a year. Something's gotta give, and I think Ainge is going to just finally have to pay up for someone via trade or trade away some of the vets there. At some point you can only carry so many players on a roster. However, coming into this season, they should be a solid 2-3 seed in the east and at least win a round or 2 in the playoffs.

Projected Win/Loss: 51-31

Off-Season Grade: A- (downgraded to - for the draft)


dbrandon wrote:dbrandon Review

Key Losses:
Jared Sullinger
Evan Turner

Losses:
John Holland
rights to Colton Iverson

Draft:
#3 Jaylen Brown
#16 Guerschon Yabusele (stashed)
#23 Ante Žižić (stashed)
#31 traded
#35 traded
#45 Demetrius Jackson
#51 Ben Bentil
#58 Abdel Nader (stashed)

I liked this draft, though I probably would have taken Dunn over Brown with the #3. Even if you have a bunch of guards on the roster already, feels like the Celtics could have squeezed Minny a little bit the same way Philly did with Orlando in the 2014 draft with Payton. I like Yabusele—he looks pretty decent. The other picks I can take or leave.

Trades:
#31 (Deyonta Davis) and #35th Rade Zagorac to Memphis Grizzlies for a 2019 LAC 1st (lotto protected)

I like this solely from an asset consolidation point of view. Davis is solid, but the Celtics have a pretty bad roster crunch problem right now.

Free Agency:
Danny Ainge (GM) contract extension
Brad Stevens (Head Coach) contract extension
Al Horford 4/$113.3m (last year PO)
Tyler Zeller 2/$16m (last year ungtd)
Gerald Green 1/$1.4 m
Jaylen Brown rookie scale
Demetrius Jackson 4/$5.5m (2m gtd -- 1st year and hlf of 2nd year, last year TO)
Ben Bentil 3/$2.5m (250k gtd only)
Marcus Georges-Hunt 1year min (25k gtd only)
Jalen Jones and Damion Lee 1 year min most likely ungtd all or close

Ainge and Stevens are no-brainers.

I like the Horford signing a lot. He does a lot of things at both PF and center that they could use—basically a better version of Sullinger, though off the top of my head Sully's a better rebounder.

Zeller's not great, but his contract's not too bad, and the last year being unguaranteed is nice, especially as a trade chip.

Green as bench depth is solid enough. We'll see what Stevens can get out of him. He's a bit of a gunner.

It is interesting to me that they're bringing Jackson and Bentil in on longer contracts. This is a common theme this year for 2nd-rounders.

Current Depth Chart: (taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Isaiah Thomas, Marcus Smart, Terry Rozier, Demetrius Jackson
SG: Avery Bradley, Gerald Green, R.J. Hunter, Marcus Georges-Hunt
SF: Jae Crowder, Jaylen Brown, James Young
PF: Kelly Olynyk, Jonas Jerebko, Jordan Mickey, Ben Bentil
C: Al Horford, Amir Johnson, Tyler Zeller

This is a solid team that got better this year and is still set up pretty well for the future.

One worry I'd have is ballhandling on the second unit. Unless you play Rozier/Smart/Brown/Jerebko/Johnson, which I think is probably more likely.

Turner will probably be missed.

Needs:
Consolidation. Thomas and Horford are great, but to get this team to the next level they really need one more really good player.

Smart needs to prove that he can be an efficient offensive player and not the second coming of Tony Allen. Not that there's anything wrong with Tony Allen—I love the guy—but he's not what the Celts thought they had in Smart, and for them to get better I think he has to get better.

Brown needs to be able to hit the ground running. SF isn't a great spot behind Crowder, and if he can't contribute from day 1 your 2nd unit SF is either James Young (NOT GREAT BOB) or Jerebko playing down a position, which seems like not such a good idea. Or Gerald Green, who makes Jeff Green look consistent.

It would be nice if Hunter showed some promise this year, too. Green and Smart as SGs are decent enough, but a little extra scoring wouldn't go amiss.

Additional Thoughts:
Watch the Celtics for consolidation trades. They HAVE to consolidate. There are 16 guaranteed and 4 partial or non guaranteed players on the roster right now.

In 2017 they have 2 firsts and 3 seconds. In addition, Yabusele and Zizic aren't going to want to stay stashed and could sign their tender to get out from under team control if the Celtics can't fit them on the roster, same as Zubcic and Brown did this year. That's not even counting Nader and Thornton, who also might take the same route.

Boston realistically could have two teams worth of players next year. That's untenable, and if you think agents and players are going to be OK with guys getting stashed for multiple years because there's no room on the roster, you're flat wrong. You just are.

Ainge has to do something, and it'll be very interesting to see how it plays out.

Projected Win/Loss: 50 wins

Off-Season Grade: A- I like a lot of the moves, but Zeller's contract is a little too high for his production, the roster crunch is a real issue, and I think Ainge is probably trying to drive too hard of a bargain at the moment for star players from the reports I've heard. You have the resources. Use them.


Slava wrote:Slava Review

Key Losses:
Evan Turner

Props to Turner for betting on himself and turning that into a nice long term contract with Portland. For every 5 players that tend to go that route, 4 usually come right back to signing MLE level deals if they are under 25 and vet minimum deals once the potential tag falls off.

Celtics will miss his playmaking ability in line ups without Isiah Thomas but the key here is to maintain cap flexibility and tying that into the likes of Turner is not one of their priorities going into next summer, which might be crucial to their free agency plans.

Losses:
John Holland
rights to Colton Iverson
Jared Sullinger

Sullinger has received regular criticism for his lack of conditioning and motivation to stay in shape but did nothing to alter that opinion. He is still a good man to man defender owing to his girth and lower body strength but otherwise a player who falls in love with the jumper too often while not being efficient enough with it. I think the rest of the rotation can handle this loss quite well, especially with the addition of Al Horford.

Draft:
#3 Jaylen Brown
#16 Guerschon Yabusele (stashed)
#23 Ante Žižić (stashed)
#31 traded
#35 traded
#45 Demetrius Jackson
#51 Ben Bentil
#58 Abdel Nader (stashed)

I think the Celtics reached a bit to draft Jaylen Brown as they already have excellent athleticism and perimeter defense which he can bring to the table right away and could afford to gamble on the upside of someone like Bender or take a more dynamic starting PG like Kris Dunn who can provide the tenaciousness on defense that goes with the roster while being a better shot creator than either Smart or Bradley.

Stacking up picks to use in trades has not gone according to Ainge's plan so far and as a result the over abundance of mid to late firsts and a roster number crunch meant he had to make drafting decisions based on players' interest in settling for a year or more abroad.

Yabusele is a stretch 4 with a SF's height, albeit with a much heavier frame. His situation in France is a bit interesting as his team got relegated to a lower division in the French league, which probably means he has to move to a new team to continue his development and lack of an NBA spot might mean he signs a new contract which may or may not have an NBA friendly out for the next few years. So when and how he comes to the NBA will be interesting to see and I venture to guess it might be 2-3 years before that happens.

Zizic is a highly rated center with impressive production in the Adriatic league at age 19. He has solid size, a high motor, plays with tenacity and fits the profile of a low usage modern NBA big man. He does not appear to have an NBA out in his current contract, which makes him more amenable to accept staying abroad a while longer and come in once he is a bit more polished and when the Celtics have a roster spot to spare.

Trades:
#31 (Deyonta Davis) and #35th Rade Zagorac to Memphis Grizzlies for a 2019 LAC 1st (lotto protected)

Another trade motivated by the roster crunch which turned out to be quite good for Memphis once Davis dropped that far.

Free Agency:
Danny Ainge (GM) contract extension
Brad Stevens (Head Coach) contract extension
Al Horford 4/$113.3m (last year PO)
Tyler Zeller 2/$16m (last year ungtd)
Gerald Green 1/$1.4 m
Jaylen Brown rookie scale
Demetrius Jackson 4/$5.5m (2m gtd -- 1st year and hlf of 2nd year, last year TO)
Ben Bentil 3/$2.5m (250k gtd only)
Marcus Georges-Hunt 1year min (25k gtd only)
Jalen Jones and Damion Lee 1 year min most likely ungtd all or close

Ainge's extensions appears to be a formality and locking up Stevens is another smart move. Once Popovich retires, he figures to be in line to be the unanimous choice for best coach in the league.

Horford in a vacuum is not worth that kind of money but his smartness and versatility fits Boston's playing scheme. He's motivated to stay in shape and hasn't had any concerning long term injuries so the 3rd and 4th years won't be as dicey as it might otherwise be for a player his age. More importantly he elevates the talent level on a roster which might be ready for an East finals appearance this year so I can't be too critical of this move. This might have looked better had they succeeded in bringing in Durant as well and weirdly enough Durant not staying in OKC might have helped them bring Al to Boston.

Zeller is the only true center on the roster and while his opportunities looked limited last year, he is still a fine option to have for match up purposes and he is being brought back on a very team friendly deal, which certainly helps maintain flexibility to open up room for one or more max contracts next summer.

Current Depth Chart: (taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Isaiah Thomas, Marcus Smart, Terry Rozier, Demetrius Jackson
SG: Avery Bradley, Gerald Green, R.J. Hunter, Marcus Georges-Hunt
SF: Jae Crowder, Jaylen Brown, James Young
PF: Amir Johnson, Jonas Jerebko, Jordan Mickey, Ben Bentil
C: Al Horford, Kelly Olynyk, Tyler Zeller

This is a quality roster with good balance. They might be missing an elite offensive player to win them a tough playoff series against Lebron and IT might have to play that role until then.

Needs:
1. Consolidate the war chest into an elite star player.

Additional Thoughts:
This is a team that's got almost everything in place from a great coach to a solid roster and they are missing one final piece to make them a true contender. It might have turned into a dream offseason if they had recruited Durant successfully and completed a trade for someone like Cousins or Griffin.

The Cavs can't be more vulnerable than they are now with an incomplete roster owing to luxury tax issues and the Raptors just exhausted their avenues for improvement having bet their house on Derozan.

So without getting too much into the media leaks of trade proposals, I see a need for greater urgency to get a big trade accomplished sooner than later so that the team's window of contention starts this season.

Even if they have to pay over the odds in terms of picks, its better to do it for the right player than having to make draft decisions with a roster crunch in mind and limiting their options to picks who can be stashed abroad.

I still see them as the best team to complete a trade for either Cousins or Butler mid-season as soon as either player becomes available but I can only grade them based on what they did this summer.

Projected Win/Loss: 50-32

Off-Season Grade: B


165bows wrote:165bows Review

Key Losses:
Jared Sullinger
Evan Turner

Losses:
John Holland
rights to Colton Iverson

Draft:
#3 Jaylen Brown
#16 Guerschon Yabusele (stashed)
#23 Ante Žižić (stashed)
#31 traded
#35 traded
#45 Demetrius Jackson
#51 Ben Bentil
#58 Abdel Nader (stashed)

Trades:
#31 (Deyonta Davis) and #35th Rade Zagorac to Memphis Grizzlies for a 2019 LAC 1st (lotto protected)

Free Agency:
Danny Ainge (GM) contract extension
Brad Stevens (Head Coach) contract extension
Al Horford 4/$113.3m (last year PO)
Tyler Zeller 2/$16m (last year ungtd)
Gerald Green 1/$1.4 m
Jaylen Brown rookie scale
Demetrius Jackson 4/$5.5m (2m gtd -- 1st year and hlf of 2nd year, last year TO)
Ben Bentil 3/$2.5m (250k gtd only)
Marcus Georges-Hunt 1year min (25k gtd only)
Jalen Jones and Damion Lee 1 year min most likely ungtd all or close

Current Depth Chart: (taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Isaiah Thomas, Marcus Smart, Terry Rozier, Demetrius Jackson
SG: Avery Bradley, Gerald Green, R.J. Hunter, Marcus Georges-Hunt
SF: Jae Crowder, Jaylen Brown, James Young
PF: Amir Johnson, Jonas Jerebko, Jordan Mickey, Ben Bentil
C: Al Horford, Kelly Olynyk, Tyler Zeller

Needs:
To see what they have. The Celtics have accumulated a stash of younger players of various upsides that will again need to beat out lower-ceiling yet established vets like Amir Johnson, Jonas Jerebko, Gerald Green and Tyler Zeller. The team plans on being competitive so younger players will have to earn minutes, with newcomer Gerald Green the question mark in my mind if he gets more of the Evan Turner-level rotation minutes or if he gets last year's Tyler Zeller treatment seeing only spot minutes. If the latter, he either isn't playing well or the young guards have grabbed hold of a substantial role.

Additional Thoughts:
"Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars."

That was the theme for the off-season that saw this team pursuing targets out of their league. While they landed closer to their target than most expected, their miss was of the 'horseshoes and handgrenades' variety as they still landed Al Horford, one of the better available FAs.

FA pursuits influenced their use of their stash of lower-end draft pick/trade assets. Significant time will have to pass before we know how much that strategy hurts their results, as three first round picks in Yabusele, Zizic and a 2019 LA Clippers pick won't be seen on this year's team and perhaps several more depending.

The big picture however is still a win, as the team addressed by far its biggest need, a reliable two-way front court player, as well as a starter-level minutes eater who can perform at a level above the average on offense.

Last year's 4th ranked defensive team should improve incrementally on that end, and the 10th ranked offense should be substantially better with offensive upgrades to Sullinger and to a lesser extent Turner.

Projected Win/Loss: 56-26

Off-Season Grade:A- :
SMTBSI
RealGM
Posts: 15,920
And1: 25,281
Joined: Jun 27, 2014
 

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#2 » by SMTBSI » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:31 am

Voted B+. The offseason to me basically just felt exactly like what a B+ on an exam felt like in grade school. It's a decent grade about which you can't really complain, but you're always shooting for an A, and any time you miss one it niggles just a little.

I was out in the wilderness, out of internet contact for about three weeks across the draft and start of free agency. It's funny, but when I first got back to a town and got myself up to date, my immediate gut reaction seems to have been exactly the opposite of everyone else's:

-- I like Horford and absolutely believe he's a substantial upgrade over Sullinger, and will make us a meaningfully better team, but I didn't really want him at that money.
-- On the other hand, I was perfectly fine with the draft. I always figured we were going to lose value somewhere along the line, since everyone knew we were getting roster crunched. So that's either overpaying for a consolidation trade, or getting creative. Yabusele, for example, was definitely a reach at #16, but, in stashing him for a year, you're recouping some of that value by effectively getting five years of development time instead of four (just wish he hadn't gone to China in the end). It's still a net loss of value, but maybe a little less so than it appears on the surface. At least that's the way I look at it...

Maybe it's a personality failing on my part, but I'll take how things went over getting abused in a trade and having to pretend to like it. If it was inevitable that we were going to lose value, which I think it was, at least we did it on our own terms, making our own decisions about where and how to compromise.



For the upcoming season, I'm assuming for the time being that the minutes will be something like this:

2600 - Thomas
2500 - Bradley
2500 - Crowder
2400 - Horford
2000 - Smart
-------
5000 - Johnson, Jerebko, Olynyk, Zeller, Mickey
2700 - Green, Brown, Rozier, Hunter, Jackson

-- IT, Bradley, Crowder, and Horford accounted for just over 10k minutes last year, so I'm crossing my fingers for general health and putting them right there again. Horford was a little higher (2631), and Crowder lower (2308), but I'm flattening their contributions out a bit, rather than trying to predict who misses games and how many.

-- Smart has played ~27mpg each of his first two seasons, but has missed games, as a result logging ~1800min his rookie year and ~1667 his sophomore. I'm giving him 27mpg again, and 73 games, for ~2000 minutes.

-- According to both nyloncalculus and BBref, Crowder played about 22% of his minutes at PF last season. I'm giving him 20% there for now. (Pending contributions elsewhere on the roster, that number could go up, but I'm playing it conservative for now. See below for my reasoning.)

That leaves about 5k minutes for our bigs, and 2700 for the rest. If you move any more of Crowder's minutes up or down, or have Jerebko spend any time at SF, you can tweak the ratio a little bit. The way I see it, our bigs have more certainty, but less upside, while the other group has the upside but lacks the certainty.

In other words, even assuming nobody really steps up, we'll at least be able to get by across those 5k minutes with the veteran likes of Amir Johnson, Jerebko, Zeller, Olynyk (with Mickey stealing minutes from that group if and only if he's earned them). They may not earn us a ton of wins in and of themselves, but they shouldn't be horribly abused most of the time either. On the other hand, I'm not sure we can really say that for the other group - I can very easily see Rozier, Hunter, and Brown not being ready for prime-time, and Green not performing any better than he did in Miami. So, you have the upside there, of Rozier or Brown breaking out, or Green getting back to his 40%-from-three ways, or Hunter showing he can get and hit shots at this level, but also a very real chance that too many of those 2700 minutes get filled with some pretty poor performances.

This is where I see the risk really lying for us this season. Right now, we pretty much need Rozier to be able to soak up some minutes - unless Jackson somehow shows readiness, then we're really only rolling with two ball-handlers ahead of him. Any game IT or Smart misses, and he's got to be ready to go.

-- A conservative profile might have him seeing about 6 to 700 minutes this season, up from 311 last season. After that, you have Green, RJ, and Brown fighting for the last ~2k minutes. Ideally, Brown and RJ steal most of them from Green, but in any case you probably need two out of three of them to be playable.
-- Another profile has Rozier pulling most of the backup PG minutes, moving Smart mostly to SG. In that case, you only need one of Green or Brown to be playable to get by most of the time.
-- If Rozier is really not ready to go at all, and you're patching most of the backup PG minutes with Smart and a little AB (I suppose), now you need even more out of the GG/JB/RJ trio.
-- If Smart regresses or has another year missing a lot of games, things get even more uncertain.
-- If we get generally positive contributions from this group, it begins to free you up to move even more of Crowder's minutes to PF.

I suppose the summary of all this is that there could very well be a minute crunch if everyone is contributing. But, are you comfortable counting on that? As it is, there seems to me to be a pretty high likelihood that we'll actually need at least one of the Rozier/Brown/Hunter trio to contribute meaningfully. If none of them do, our margin for error gets pretty small in some ways. So, maybe it's not practical that all three of them log major minutes, but, at least you have three swings at the bat to find a contributor.




...Forgot my prediction.

53-29.
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 40,980
And1: 27,845
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#3 » by Fencer reregistered » Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:16 am

Some comments on the above:

-- Brown was a consensus top-3 projection a year ago. He shows ever sign of being a good kid. If you're ever going to gamble on somebody's 1 year of college production being misleading, he was a good candidate for the gamble.

-- Brown is actually at the most open position on the team. First, Crowder didn't really have an appropriately-sized backup, although Smart can fake it pretty well. Second, Crowder's positional versatility means he can free up as many SF minutes as Brown is able to take.

-- The Cs don't actually have an extra 2017 first round pick. The Nets pick is a swap, no doubt for reasons of the Stepien Rule. What's more, the Nets get the Cs' 2nd rounder as well.

-- Yes, the Cs are wasting some of their lesser assets due to roster crunch.

-- Too bad the Cs couldn't or couldn't see a reason to outbid the Suns for the #8 pick. That would have been exactly the sort of consolidation move we were hoping for.

-- Rarely have I seen a pick as late as Zizic be viewed, both before and after the draft, as a consensus right move.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,521
And1: 6,859
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#4 » by Andre Roberstan » Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:20 am

As Homerclease pointed out to me, I double counted the pick swap for 2017. I flip-flopped the swap year and the trade year for the BRK picks in my mind :-/
Image
patman52
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,712
And1: 848
Joined: Jan 03, 2016
 

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#5 » by patman52 » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:50 am

I agree with Hartford Whalers on Zizic and Korkmaz as stashes. Bradley will be paid in two years and by then Korkmaz will have filled out on couscous. I do like that Yabu was stashed in China-not Europe and available after the deadline if the celts do consolidation trade at the deadline.

I wanted Bender, I was in the minority in that I was willing to take the Philly package for the 3 draft night as I like hometown kids. But seeing Brown this summer gives me a little more faith in Ainge. I also see him getting SG min in the future when Bradley leaves. Loved the Green and Horford signing. Wished they kept sully instead of Zeller, I think we will miss his board work.

Jackson falling in out laps at the mid 2nd is a gift.

The celts ability to get past the cavs in the next two years (+ raptors!) is linked to thier ability to get another Horford level player as a FA or in a trade. 53-29, a 10% improvement in wins.
winter_mute_13
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,996
And1: 1,482
Joined: Oct 08, 2003
 

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#6 » by winter_mute_13 » Thu Sep 22, 2016 8:30 am

I'm not really sure how to evaluate Boston's offseason. On the one hand, they signed arguably the 2nd best FA on the market. On the other hand, I don't feel that Horford's addition pushes them to an entire new tier. He's an evolutionary upgrade, not a game changer for Boston IMO. It's like they went from 3 very good but not great players to 4. So an improvement, but not a massive one.

This is kind of illustrated by the win predictions - nearly every (non-Boston) reviewer predicts 50 wins for Boston, after they won 48 last year. It just doesn't feel like a massive upgrade.

It's true though that Boston still has a massive war-chest of assets. They remain well-positioned to trade for someone if and when a superstar comes on the market. The problem for them is that superstar availability is a factor they don't control.

Not a big fan of Boston's draft either, but I also think it's a fairly weak draft year, so I'm not sure how much better they could have done.

I'd call their offseason a B+, I think. Good but not great. Which is a perfectly apt description for the Celtics, possibly.
Writebloc
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,075
And1: 5,615
Joined: May 20, 2015
         

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#7 » by Writebloc » Thu Sep 22, 2016 9:49 am

Strange reading all the discourse on Brown. In a league starved for stretchy athletic wings/swings Boston drafts one with a healthy desire to want to be a star and people are calling it a reach? Over who, a questionable Euro big who doesn't really have a position nor after repeated scouting the potential to be a star or a 22 year old PG who has already reached his upside, can't shoot, with documented injury history, and who also refused to work out for any team? If your scouting information is based on mocks I understand, but at the end of the day I give Ainge and Stevens the benefit of the doubt.
Drax
Analyst
Posts: 3,461
And1: 3,106
Joined: Nov 28, 2012
Location: Germany
   

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#8 » by Drax » Thu Sep 22, 2016 10:13 am

As a Celtics fan i'm on board with the common opinion this was a 'b-ish' offseason that pushed the Celtics in the tier of fringe contenders that is good but not quiet good enough to compete with the very best of the NBA. Combining the reviews you can actually get a pretty good idea what is up with the team.

I'm on board that the Celtics really want/need a go-to-star player, who doesn't really, it's a no brainer. But that is quite often not in your own hands, other teams have make such a player available and i'm not sure there will be a market for that type of player anytime soon. But what the Celtics really needed for this team next season didn't really come up in the reviews and could change some grades in my opinion. Three point shooting, the Celtics need a sharpshooter and didn't bother getting one. That is potentially a really huge concern going forward. All of the guards/wings are at best average shooters but the system installed by Stevens relys on shooting quite a bit. I've a soft spot for Green but was there no better alternative out there, even if it meant spending a bit more (MLE money) for a veteran shooter.

I'm also on board with dbrandon's POV on Smart, i belive a lot of moves/non-moves will depend on his development on offense. This year is huge for Smart, he will have more responsibility as the 'leader' of the second unit. Personally that's the most intersting thing with this years Celtics, how will Smart and to a lesser degree the other young guys respond to the tasks at hand. If they (Smart, Rozier, Brown, maybe Hunter and Mickey) show they are capable NBA rotation players that could open a huge window of opportunity for trades. I can't wait for this season to start ...
The 2024 NBA Champions Boston Celtics depth chart:

Guards: Holiday, White, Pritchard
Wings: Tatum, Brown, Hauser
Bigs: Porzingis, Horford, Kornet
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,906
And1: 14,705
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#9 » by 165bows » Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:54 am

winter_mute_13 wrote:I'm not really sure how to evaluate Boston's offseason. On the one hand, they signed arguably the 2nd best FA on the market. On the other hand, I don't feel that Horford's addition pushes them to an entire new tier. He's an evolutionary upgrade, not a game changer for Boston IMO. It's like they went from 3 very good but not great players to 4. So an improvement, but not a massive one.

This is kind of illustrated by the win predictions - nearly every (non-Boston) reviewer predicts 50 wins for Boston, after they won 48 last year. It just doesn't feel like a massive upgrade.

It's true though that Boston still has a massive war-chest of assets. They remain well-positioned to trade for someone if and when a superstar comes on the market. The problem for them is that superstar availability is a factor they don't control.

Not a big fan of Boston's draft either, but I also think it's a fairly weak draft year, so I'm not sure how much better they could have done.

I'd call their offseason a B+, I think. Good but not great. Which is a perfectly apt description for the Celtics, possibly.

Just for some context on the win prediction, the Celtics were only 22-19 at the half way point last season, contrasted with a total of 51-31 combining the two second halves of the last two seasons (essentially the start of the Thomas/Crowder era for the team).

The first half of last year was not IMO a great indication of the team strength, as they were overloaded with mediocre big men they were trying to find time for (they started David Lee, who was cut, and Tyler Zeller, who ended the season on the bench, as their starting front court for reference). Once they benched and cut Lee and played more to their strengths (ie, small ball), that is the current baseline of the team I'm projecting improvements from.

So the replacement of Sullinger (and David Lee's minutes) with Horford for me moves them up *from* a level of a 51-win team, rather than to that level. Admittedly 56 is an aggressive win total for the team, and there are umpteen reasons why it may not happen. There are good reasons however to project this team as a mid-50s win team that may not be obvious at first glance. Some background clarification on that part of my prediction.
SMTBSI
RealGM
Posts: 15,920
And1: 25,281
Joined: Jun 27, 2014
 

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#10 » by SMTBSI » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:47 pm

165bows wrote:
winter_mute_13 wrote:This is kind of illustrated by the win predictions - nearly every (non-Boston) reviewer predicts 50 wins for Boston, after they won 48 last year. It just doesn't feel like a massive upgrade.

Just for some context on the win prediction, the Celtics were only 22-19 at the half way point last season, contrasted with a total of 51-31 combining the two second halves of the last two seasons (essentially the start of the Thomas/Crowder era for the team).

The first half of last year was not IMO a great indication of the team strength, as they were overloaded with mediocre big men they were trying to find time for (they started David Lee, who was cut, and Tyler Zeller, who ended the season on the bench, as their starting front court for reference). Once they benched and cut Lee and played more to their strengths (ie, small ball), that is the current baseline of the team I'm projecting improvements from.

So the replacement of Sullinger (and David Lee's minutes) with Horford for me moves them up *from* a level of a 51-win team, rather than to that level.

That's a good way to put it.

Now, we can argue about whether we're a "regular season team", who wins maybe more games than we should off of hustle and stubbornness, but doesn't look as good in the playoffs when teams clamp down. But, it's regular season results that we're prognosticating here anyway.

So, you've got moderately good evidence we're capable of sustaining a 50-win pace, and now you've replaced Sully and Lee with Horford.

I guess we're about to learn just how much Evan Turner really mattered after all...
SMTBSI
RealGM
Posts: 15,920
And1: 25,281
Joined: Jun 27, 2014
 

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#11 » by SMTBSI » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:58 pm

Drax wrote:But what the Celtics really needed for this team next season didn't really come up in the reviews and could change some grades in my opinion. Three point shooting, the Celtics need a sharpshooter and didn't bother getting one. That is potentially a really huge concern going forward. All of the guards/wings are at best average shooters but the system installed by Stevens relys on shooting quite a bit. I've a soft spot for Green but was there no better alternative out there, even if it meant spending a bit more (MLE money) for a veteran shooter.

I'm also on board with dbrandon's POV on Smart, i belive a lot of moves/non-moves will depend on his development on offense. This year is huge for Smart, he will have more responsibility as the 'leader' of the second unit. Personally that's the most intersting thing with this years Celtics, how will Smart and to a lesser degree the other young guys respond to the tasks at hand. If they (Smart, Rozier, Brown, maybe Hunter and Mickey) show they are capable NBA rotation players that could open a huge window of opportunity for trades.

Agreed on both points. As much as I'm pulling for both Smart and Rozier, I don't think you can have IT/AB/Smart/Rozier pulling most of your minutes at PG/SG long term. I just can't see that group giving you enough shooting, even if Bradley does get back to flirting with 40%. Adding consideration of Crowder and Brown doesn't improve matters.

So, you either need Smart to show he can be effective backing up IT full-time, and then go find yourself an upgrade for Green, or you need Rozier to take a strangehold of the backup job, and think hard about moving on from Smart. Hopefully Hunter has something to say about all of this, but, either way, it's hard to see both Smart and Rozier as top-9 minutes guys moving forward.

The best possible outcome would probably be something like Smart establishing himself as a new-and-improved Turner, bringing everything but outside shooting from the PG spot, and Rozier playing well enough this season in the minutes he does get to become a useful trade chip for acquiring that shooter. (Worst is neither one of them showing enough aptitude to be a longterm solution at backup PG, and then where are you?)


Drax wrote:I can't wait for this season to start ...

Tell me about it...
cammac
General Manager
Posts: 8,757
And1: 6,216
Joined: Aug 02, 2013
Location: Niagara Peninsula
         

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#12 » by cammac » Thu Sep 22, 2016 1:26 pm

Overall I think the off season should be a major disappointment for the Celtics in that they choose the consensus #8 pick Brown at #3 and the rest of the draft was very chaotic with likely Zizic the best other player drafted. Horford was a nice free agent but still a risk with his injury history and age and he is still playing C where he would be more effective at PF. I think many are underestimating the loss of Turner and Sullinger who likely are the equivalent to the pick-up of Horford.

This is a season of what they did versus what they should have done basically a punt B- 50 wins plus or minus 1.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 17,749
And1: 12,469
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#13 » by brackdan70 » Thu Sep 22, 2016 1:28 pm

I love d the Jaylen Brown pick and the guy grows on me everything i hear about him. before the Draft I had little differentiation between 3-7, but really glad the Cs drafted Brown.

For the rest of the Draft the Cs needed stash guys to keep space open for big free agent runs at Horford and Durrant. Maybe Durrant was a fools errand but it was pretty exciting effort. I am happy with Zizic, looks like a very solid pick. Yabasule is a stretch but I am not concerned about it. he is very intriguing and its not like they passed over anyone that is going to get minutes this year by picking him at 16.

Obviously signing Horford was great. I loved Turner but moving on from him is a good thing. Sully had his moments, but the Cs will also be better with out him.

the Cs were unable thus far to pull off a consolidation trade, but I am glad Ainge is not trading just to trade. Those Brooklyn picks will have a really good chance to add another star quality player whether in a trade or drafting.

A-

55 wins, lose to Lebron in the ECF :(
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
rzzzzz
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,680
And1: 1,758
Joined: Feb 21, 2015
 

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#14 » by rzzzzz » Thu Sep 22, 2016 2:24 pm

is Boston trying to contend or are they rebuilding? both at the time, thanks to Billy King, but this is a hard needle to thread. to contend, they need to hold onto their starters and best contributors instead of trading for major talent to build around. a serious rebuild means they have to hold onto their draft picks, which,again, they then can't spend on serious talent to plug into an intact line-up. so they are hoping to lure their top echelon all star in free agency. until that happens, players grow older and contracts come due.

Jaylen Brown is a healthy swing for the fences. there are more Tom Robinsons than Russ Westbrooks, but it's all or nothing instead of incremental. incremental ain't going to get it done. but Brown is raw, its going to take serious time even if he does eventually blow up to lead this team. that's the other issue, not only drafting the right prospects but then having to wait on them, if free agency doesn't already have your team contending for the title.

it's an interesting strategy built on a great opportunity. we'll see how it works out.
nowyouknow
Junior
Posts: 341
And1: 88
Joined: Aug 27, 2016

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#15 » by nowyouknow » Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:00 pm

How many teams had better offseasons?

If you sign a top 2 free agent it's sort of hard to give that offseason grade anything less than an A-.

The draft is always tough to judge this soon, but it certainly seems that people are making a snap judgement on Brown, Yabusele based on mock drafts.

For those that watched the Summer League Brown was pretty impressive. He basically displayed his unreal level of athleticism, defensive versatility, and slashing ability. He defended everyone from Kay Felder to Ben Simmons and showed remarkable footspeed and strength.

He rebounded the ball very well and basically lived at the free throw line.

Way too early to call that a reach. Yabusele and Zizic are stashes that fit the mold of what Ainge and Stevens want to do up front with skilled size.

Gerald Green looks like another reclamation project along the lines of Jordan Crawford or Evan Turner.

Overall, I think the off-season fell short of A+ material but it's hard to go with anything short of an A-.
User avatar
jmr07019
General Manager
Posts: 8,396
And1: 8,201
Joined: Oct 29, 2009
       

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#16 » by jmr07019 » Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:45 pm

I feel as though the Celtics draft is graded too harshly by most. If you told Celtic's fans before the draft that picks 16, 23, 31 and 35 would be used to acquire 2 of Ainge's top stash choices and a future 1st most would have jumped for joy. But when a guy projected to go high in mocks falls and we pass on him all of a sudden it's a catastrophe. Brown vs the field at 3? Time will tell. Judging now is necessary for a thread like this but it's mostly a waste of time.
Show Love Spread Love
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,316
And1: 20,910
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#17 » by HartfordWhalers » Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:54 pm

The idea that a guy cannot be called a reach at the time of the draft is just an absurd one, without any logical foundation.

If a guy is widely projected to be drafted at one slot, and instead gets picked at a slot half the number, that in general is likely to be a big discrepancy. Same on the flip side if a guy is projected to get picked at a slot in the other direction and slides to a slot twice as far down.

Now some reaches turn out to be brilliant picks, and some turn out to be guys where the consensus was right and one GM just overvalued them way too much. Broadly speaking about the past half dozen drafts, the data looks to me to support the notion that most reaches turn out to examples of GM hubris -- with guys taken earlier than expected performing closer to their expected draft spot than their actual draft spot. Which fits with the whole idea of the wisdom of crowds; the best individual draft models tend to lag the average of several models even when inferior models are introduced.

However, this isn't the only possible result. Rozier never passed 29th in a DX mock, and we will see this upcoming season if he was instead a smart against the grain pick by Ainge and clearly a lotto talent that others just overlooked. That we won't know definitively how the individual prospects work out in the long run would seem such an obvious comment that it need not be caveated. Instead there are posters using that to declare that we cannot make any judgments now -- and then immediately judging other picks as good right now for maximum irony. That sort of straw man has no place in any real discussion.

All that said, I'm more than happy to discuss what the general consensus was of where the prospects might fall pre-draft if that really is in question, or the merits of any individual draft pick that might have been ignored/underrated by the consensus.
nowyouknow
Junior
Posts: 341
And1: 88
Joined: Aug 27, 2016

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#18 » by nowyouknow » Thu Sep 22, 2016 4:04 pm

I disagree and the foundation of the argument is that the words of mock draft internet scouts is suspect at best.

Brown was widely projected as being in play from 3-8 (where there was plenty of debate about who BPA was in that range).

He was also a top 5 recruit coming out of high school.

There is nothing definitive about mock draft projections.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,590
And1: 7,643
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#19 » by jayjaysee » Thu Sep 22, 2016 4:21 pm

nowyouknow wrote:How many teams had better offseasons?


That's not what this is about though. IMO the Celtics had maybe the 2nd best offseason? Not sure who could argue higher than them/KD. Not going to waste time thinking about it. But this is more about how they did compared to how they could have done, without factoring that in of course they had an A+ offseason

I'm with most here, I didn't like the draft. I'd love to see them somehow get in on the Phoenix trade. That seems like it would have matched the win now-and-later. I understand Boston not "pushing all in" but a outbidding Phoenix in consolidation draft trade, using assets that you can't maximize as is, would have worked..

And I'm with the mob that doesn't like Brown and will have to eat crow over it if necessary. I'd rather have Dunn or Bender. Or maybe even Murray. But for the Celtics specifically, I would have traded. And in your opinion, those that didn't watch much college ball but form their opinions off of highlights-scoutingvideos/DX are more suspect than you referencing high school and summer league?

I also am not sure how Evan Turner was a reclamation project but I guess that's just perspective.
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,521
And1: 6,859
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Boston early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/165bows) 

Post#20 » by Andre Roberstan » Thu Sep 22, 2016 4:33 pm

The definition of a reach is literally a guy drafted several spots higher than he was projected. Whether you think his talent merits the draft spot is irrelevant to that definition.
Image

Return to Trades and Transactions