suns and knicks
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
suns and knicks
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,409
- And1: 85
- Joined: Nov 20, 2001
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
suns and knicks
phx trades: knight, tucker
ny trades: rose, ndour
suns clear their logjam of pgs and save some $, knicks move the unhappy rose and get younger
ny trades: rose, ndour
suns clear their logjam of pgs and save some $, knicks move the unhappy rose and get younger
Re: suns and knicks
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,589
- And1: 32,178
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: suns and knicks
Suns should do this.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: suns and knicks
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,797
- And1: 2,158
- Joined: Mar 19, 2016
Re: suns and knicks
The Knicks shouldn't unless they offset some of Knights salary.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential and still be treated as if you were reasonable.
Re: suns and knicks
-
- Junior
- Posts: 325
- And1: 65
- Joined: Nov 28, 2016
Re: suns and knicks
shagadelic45 wrote:phx trades: knight, tucker
ny trades: rose, ndour
suns clear their logjam of pgs and save some $, knicks move the unhappy rose and get younger
While trading away Knight and Tucker is good for us and cap space is always good, we don't need to make any moves ASAP so we should wait for the right one. We don't need the cap space now but I would definitely do it if we got another good young player out of the deal. Maybe O'Quinn? I'll admit I don't know the Knick's roster too well though.
Re: suns and knicks
- NashtyNas
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,259
- And1: 1,887
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Re: suns and knicks
Why not make it a bit bigger since Melo isn't leaving?
Knight, Chandler, Tucker for Noah, Rose, Ndour, Hernangomez
Actually I already like it less for the Suns now that I think about it..
Knight, Chandler, Tucker for Noah, Rose, Ndour, Hernangomez
Actually I already like it less for the Suns now that I think about it..
The underappreciated greats:
Some seek fame cause they need validation, some say hating is confused admiration - Nasty, nasty Nas
Re: suns and knicks
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,690
- And1: 660
- Joined: Aug 20, 2007
Re: suns and knicks
incredible as it may sound, Knight has already proven to be a 20PPG scorer on a losing team when given the ball, which is more than Rose is able to pump out right now and on slightly better efficiency as a starter. Knight is also good for more assists, rebounds and steals as a starter for Jeff Hornacek. Knight even with all of his on-court troubles has been very professional about his benching. Rose has some decent off-court troubles in addition to his declining production. Rose is also expiring, which is good in one way, but not in another. I don't think Knight is a PJ Tuckers away in value from Knight at this point. Rose is just not a good fit also. It's a no all around.
Re: suns and knicks
- NashtyNas
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,259
- And1: 1,887
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Re: suns and knicks
SideSwipe wrote:incredible as it may sound, Knight has already proven to be a 20PPG scorer on a losing team when given the ball, which is more than Rose is able to pump out right now and on slightly better efficiency as a starter. Knight is also good for more assists, rebounds and steals as a starter for Jeff Hornacek. Knight even with all of his on-court troubles has been very professional about his benching. Rose has some decent off-court troubles in addition to his declining production. Rose is also expiring, which is good in one way, but not in another. I don't think Knight is a PJ Tuckers away in value from Knight at this point. Rose is just not a good fit also. It's a no all around.
The idea is to dump salary - I doubt we'd ever keep Rose going forward.
I don't mind it, but I'm not sure there isn't something better out there.
Knight could go on a tear the rest of the season like he's done in the past and maybe play himself into a better value so that we get something we like in return. Unlikely, could happen.
We're in no rush and have no need for cap space this off season... so I can see the argument against the trade. That's for sure.
But it's not as bad as you make it sound.
The underappreciated greats:
Some seek fame cause they need validation, some say hating is confused admiration - Nasty, nasty Nas
Re: suns and knicks
-
- Suns Forum College Scout
- Posts: 16,664
- And1: 6,311
- Joined: Jun 25, 2009
- Location: the Arizona desert
Re: suns and knicks
Makes sense for those with a realistic viewpoint of Knight's value. Looking for his 4th different team.
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
Re: suns and knicks
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,690
- And1: 660
- Joined: Aug 20, 2007
Re: suns and knicks
DirtyDez wrote:Makes sense for those with a realistic viewpoint of Knight's value. Looking for his 4th different team.
If that's his value, the deal doesn't get done. McD will not make this trade. You are basically using Tucker then to salary dump Knight. Not going to happen under McD, I don't think. Regardless of whether there are other teams value his as highly, McD does value him, and will just keep him on the bench if there is not good value to be had.
Re: suns and knicks
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,690
- And1: 660
- Joined: Aug 20, 2007
Re: suns and knicks
I_Socrates wrote:SideSwipe wrote:incredible as it may sound, Knight has already proven to be a 20PPG scorer on a losing team when given the ball, which is more than Rose is able to pump out right now and on slightly better efficiency as a starter. Knight is also good for more assists, rebounds and steals as a starter for Jeff Hornacek. Knight even with all of his on-court troubles has been very professional about his benching. Rose has some decent off-court troubles in addition to his declining production. Rose is also expiring, which is good in one way, but not in another. I don't think Knight is a PJ Tuckers away in value from Knight at this point. Rose is just not a good fit also. It's a no all around.
The idea is to dump salary - I doubt we'd ever keep Rose going forward.
I don't mind it, but I'm not sure there isn't something better out there.
Knight could go on a tear the rest of the season like he's done in the past and maybe play himself into a better value so that we get something we like in return. Unlikely, could happen.
We're in no rush and have no need for cap space this off season... so I can see the argument against the trade. That's for sure.
But it's not as bad as you make it sound.
In your scenario we use Tucker to salary dump Knight. Does that sound like a McD move? Not going to happen. We won't keep Rose. If that is your goal, this type of deal won't happen during the season, it is more likely in the offseason with another team. There are certainly other competing teams that will pony up for Tucker and not see his as filler in a salary dump. Knight is as good or close to as good as Rose is now, makes less money and is locked up for three more years- is far younger and still has upside. Sorry, but I just can't get there at all.
Re: suns and knicks
-
- Suns Forum College Scout
- Posts: 16,664
- And1: 6,311
- Joined: Jun 25, 2009
- Location: the Arizona desert
Re: suns and knicks
SideSwipe wrote:DirtyDez wrote:Makes sense for those with a realistic viewpoint of Knight's value. Looking for his 4th different team.
If that's his value, the deal doesn't get done. McD will not make this trade. You are basically using Tucker then to salary dump Knight. Not going to happen under McD, I don't think. Regardless of whether there are other teams value his as highly, McD does value him, and will just keep him on the bench if there is not good value to be had.
I agree. McD values him differently which we found out two years ago.
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
Re: suns and knicks
- NashtyNas
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,259
- And1: 1,887
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Re: suns and knicks
SideSwipe wrote:
In your scenario we use Tucker to salary dump Knight. Does that sound like a McD move? Not going to happen. We won't keep Rose. If that is your goal, this type of deal won't happen during the season, it is more likely in the offseason with another team. There are certainly other competing teams that will pony up for Tucker and not see his as filler in a salary dump. Knight is as good or close to as good as Rose is now, makes less money and is locked up for three more years- is far younger and still has upside. Sorry, but I just can't get there at all.
If you're saying McD values Knight too highly and wouldn't do this, I don't disagree with you.
If you're saying it's a bad move because McD thinks it's a bad move, I do disagree with you.
I would trade Knight+Tucker for Rose + W.Hernangomez or some minor asset very quickly and get a do-over on that Knight contract/trade that's been nothing but horrible thus far. I agree McD won't, but that doesn't make him right.
The underappreciated greats:
Some seek fame cause they need validation, some say hating is confused admiration - Nasty, nasty Nas
Re: suns and knicks
- Jellybeans
- Starter
- Posts: 2,058
- And1: 2,346
- Joined: Feb 13, 2016
Re: suns and knicks
I_Socrates wrote:Why not make it a bit bigger since Melo isn't leaving?
Knight, Chandler, Tucker for Noah, Rose, Ndour, Hernangomez
Actually I already like it less for the Suns now that I think about it..
Hernangomez wont be traded!KP's BFF and damn rook
Re: suns and knicks
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,690
- And1: 660
- Joined: Aug 20, 2007
Re: suns and knicks
I_Socrates wrote:SideSwipe wrote:
In your scenario we use Tucker to salary dump Knight. Does that sound like a McD move? Not going to happen. We won't keep Rose. If that is your goal, this type of deal won't happen during the season, it is more likely in the offseason with another team. There are certainly other competing teams that will pony up for Tucker and not see his as filler in a salary dump. Knight is as good or close to as good as Rose is now, makes less money and is locked up for three more years- is far younger and still has upside. Sorry, but I just can't get there at all.
If you're saying McD values Knight too highly and wouldn't do this, I don't disagree with you.
If you're saying it's a bad move because McD thinks it's a bad move, I do disagree with you.
I would trade Knight+Tucker for Rose + W.Hernangomez or some minor asset very quickly and get a do-over on that Knight contract/trade that's been nothing but horrible thus far. I agree McD won't, but that doesn't make him right.
On this point we will disagree, because I think McD is right to wait.
Re: suns and knicks
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,409
- And1: 85
- Joined: Nov 20, 2001
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
Re: suns and knicks
rose for knight, straight up, works also.....maybe simpler and better
Re: suns and knicks
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,797
- And1: 2,158
- Joined: Mar 19, 2016
Re: suns and knicks
I_Socrates wrote:Why not make it a bit bigger since Melo isn't leaving?
Knight, Chandler, Tucker for Noah, Rose, Ndour, Hernangomez
Actually I already like it less for the Suns now that I think about it..
Edit. I got Tucker mixed up with Dudley. I still don't like including Hernangomez.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential and still be treated as if you were reasonable.
Return to Trades and Transactions