Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston"

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,944
And1: 3,776
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston" 

Post#41 » by BleedGreen1989 » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:20 pm

Cardinalsfan27 wrote:
BleedGreen1989 wrote:David Aldridge saying the "hold up" is CHI wants Crowder in the deal with the Brooklyn 17.


Where? There's nothing on his twitter account.


Can't copy the format on my phone for some reason.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1506931&start=1200#start_here

Page 61. At the top. About the 1:50 mark
User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,944
And1: 3,776
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Official "Butler to Boston" Thread 

Post#42 » by BleedGreen1989 » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:22 pm

buckboy wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Bradley / Brk 17 / rights to Yabusele / Minnesota 2nd 2017

Is as high as I'd go. Bulls want more id say thanks but no thanks


Pretty much what I think. Both Brooklyn picks is crazy talk in my opinion. He's not worth that.


I really strive to be as non-bias as I can be and this is pretty much where I'm at.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,569
And1: 32,154
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston" 

Post#43 » by jbk1234 » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:27 pm

BleedGreen1989 wrote:
Cardinalsfan27 wrote:
BleedGreen1989 wrote:David Aldridge saying the "hold up" is CHI wants Crowder in the deal with the Brooklyn 17.


Where? There's nothing on his twitter account.


Can't copy the format on my phone for some reason.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1506931&start=1200#start_here

Page 61. At the top. About the 1:50 mark


That strikes me as a really weird ask for the Bulls. A lot of Crowder's value comes from his contract and that contract is even more valuable to a win-now team than one entering a rebuild. So Crowder is worth much more the Celtics than he should to the Bulls, and yet the Bulls are insisting on him?
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,944
And1: 3,776
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston" 

Post#44 » by BleedGreen1989 » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:29 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
BleedGreen1989 wrote:
Cardinalsfan27 wrote:
Where? There's nothing on his twitter account.


Can't copy the format on my phone for some reason.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1506931&start=1200#start_here

Page 61. At the top. About the 1:50 mark


That strikes me as a really weird ask for the Bulls. A lot of Crowder's value comes from his contract and that contract is even more valuable to a win-now team than one entering a rebuild. So Crowder is worth much more the Celtics than he should to the Bulls, and yet the Bulls are insisting on him?


Kind of my thoughts.

Only rationale I see is if CHI doesn't want to do a full tear down and figure Crowder can give them 60% of what Jimmy does.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,569
And1: 32,154
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston" 

Post#45 » by jbk1234 » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:32 pm

BleedGreen1989 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
BleedGreen1989 wrote:
Can't copy the format on my phone for some reason.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1506931&start=1200#start_here

Page 61. At the top. About the 1:50 mark


That strikes me as a really weird ask for the Bulls. A lot of Crowder's value comes from his contract and that contract is even more valuable to a win-now team than one entering a rebuild. So Crowder is worth much more the Celtics than he should to the Bulls, and yet the Bulls are insisting on him?


Kind of my thoughts.

Only rationale I see is if CHI doesn't want to do a full tear down and figure Crowder can give them 60% of what Jimmy does.


Either that or they're trying to pry Brown lose and they're insisting on one or the other.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,944
And1: 3,776
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston" 

Post#46 » by BleedGreen1989 » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:35 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
BleedGreen1989 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
That strikes me as a really weird ask for the Bulls. A lot of Crowder's value comes from his contract and that contract is even more valuable to a win-now team than one entering a rebuild. So Crowder is worth much more the Celtics than he should to the Bulls, and yet the Bulls are insisting on him?


Kind of my thoughts.

Only rationale I see is if CHI doesn't want to do a full tear down and figure Crowder can give them 60% of what Jimmy does.


Either that or they're trying to pry Brown lose and they're insisting on one or the other.


Good point.

I'm sure if the deal was just the Brooklyn pick, it'd be done by now.
User avatar
buckboy
RealGM
Posts: 12,523
And1: 7,903
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: At the Gettin' Place
     

Re: Official "Butler to Boston" Thread 

Post#47 » by buckboy » Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:16 pm

BleedGreen1989 wrote:
buckboy wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Bradley / Brk 17 / rights to Yabusele / Minnesota 2nd 2017

Is as high as I'd go. Bulls want more id say thanks but no thanks


Pretty much what I think. Both Brooklyn picks is crazy talk in my opinion. He's not worth that.


I really strive to be as non-bias as I can be and this is pretty much where I'm at.


I'm seeing proposals with BKN 17 AND BKN 18/Brown AND Zizic. There's just no way Butler is worth that. He's an excellent player and would seem to help Boston quite a bit, but that's just excessive in my opinion.

Of course given the Plumlee and Cousins deals, who the heck knows I guess?
"This is my home, this is my city...I'm blessed to be a part of the Milwaukee Bucks for the next 5 years. Let's make these years count. The show goes on, let's get it."
OrlandoDream
General Manager
Posts: 7,524
And1: 5,940
Joined: Jul 05, 2013
Location: Altamonte Springs Fl
 

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston" 

Post#48 » by OrlandoDream » Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:20 pm

Give them Brown, 17 Brook, and Rozier. Just do it already. Everyone knows Boston is the team that has the assets to trade for him that interest Bulls the most. Ainge needs to stop being such a cheapsh*t and GarPax needs to stop overvaluing JB.
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 29,288
And1: 28,273
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: Official "Butler to Boston" Thread 

Post#49 » by mademan » Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:22 pm

buckboy wrote:
BleedGreen1989 wrote:
buckboy wrote:
Pretty much what I think. Both Brooklyn picks is crazy talk in my opinion. He's not worth that.


I really strive to be as non-bias as I can be and this is pretty much where I'm at.


I'm seeing proposals with BKN 17 AND BKN 18/Brown AND Zizic. There's just no way Butler is worth that. He's an excellent player and would seem to help Boston quite a bit, but that's just excessive in my opinion.

Of course given the Plumlee and Cousins deals, who the heck knows I guess?


Because draft picks often get overrated. You can comb through the last 10 draft, and out of 30 players in the top 3 picks, maybe 10 of them have been as good/better than Butler. Thats not a good strike rate, at all. To me, fair value is either both picks or 17pick+Butler. It's hard to get a guy as good Butler; to get a guy as good as him, as young as him, no locker room issues and signed long term....normally impossible, only made possible by the cache of assets the Celtics have
cellar-door
Starter
Posts: 2,377
And1: 1,095
Joined: Mar 08, 2012

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston" 

Post#50 » by cellar-door » Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:38 pm

I think something like this is interesting. Probably less than CHI wants, but... what you get for a star usually is:

Butler
Portis

Crowder
18 BKN
Zeller (just an expiring salary fill)
Jackson
any 2 of (rights to Yabu, 2018 BOS, 2019 MEM, 2019 LAC)

My thought process is this:
CHI supposedly wants 2017 BKN and Crowder, but BOS won't budge on that.
So CHI pushes back the Brooklyn pick, adds the rebounding bench big Boston needs, and in return they get 2 more mid-late 1sts (or Yabu who is the equivalent) and roll the dice on Jackson as a rotation PG.
Might need a little tweaking around the edges, but that to me seems like the kind of deal that is most likely to get done.

Now, maybe that means Butler goes nowhere this deadline, which I think is likely, but I just don't see Ainge based on how he's always operated giving up 2 of Brown/2017 BKN/2018 BKN.

If he was going to bite on that deal it was at the draft, now that BKN basically has locked in the best lottery odds, and Brown has progressed well (and Jimmy has less time under contract left) I don't see why he changes his mind. Especially given the dearth of other teams able to top his offer. If CHI is looking to get Crowder, I would guess it isn't just for re-trade value, it's that they see this as a quick turnaround.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,569
And1: 32,154
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston" 

Post#51 » by jbk1234 » Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:47 pm

cellar-door wrote:I think something like this is interesting. Probably less than CHI wants, but... what you get for a star usually is:

Butler
Portis

Crowder
18 BKN
Zeller (just an expiring salary fill)
Jackson
any 2 of (rights to Yabu, 2018 BOS, 2019 MEM, 2019 LAC)

My thought process is this:
CHI supposedly wants 2017 BKN and Crowder, but BOS won't budge on that.
So CHI pushes back the Brooklyn pick, adds the rebounding bench big Boston needs, and in return they get 2 more mid-late 1sts (or Yabu who is the equivalent) and roll the dice on Jackson as a rotation PG.
Might need a little tweaking around the edges, but that to me seems like the kind of deal that is most likely to get done.

Now, maybe that means Butler goes nowhere this deadline, which I think is likely, but I just don't see Ainge based on how he's always operated giving up 2 of Brown/2017 BKN/2018 BKN.

If he was going to bite on that deal it was at the draft, now that BKN basically has locked in the best lottery odds, and Brown has progressed well (and Jimmy has less time under contract left) I don't see why he changes his mind. Especially given the dearth of other teams able to top his offer. If CHI is looking to get Crowder, I would guess it isn't just for re-trade value, it's that they see this as a quick turnaround.


So long as Butler stays healthy, there's a very good chance he is more expensive on draft day and not less.

Part of the value to the Bulls in trading him now is there own pick falls into the lottery. Once the deadline passes, that's no longer an option.

On draft day, the Bulls can see where everyone is picking - including teams like the Wolves and Suns. They can see who slips. Meanwhile the Celtics are looking at drafting yet another guard which is their deepest position with a top-3 pick. How excited is Ainge going to be to do that with IT, AB, & Smart all coming into the last year of their contracts? Finally, and this is really the big risk for the Celtics IMO, GarPax could get canned and you could have a different GM making that trade.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
User avatar
BR0D1E86
RealGM
Posts: 17,759
And1: 2,292
Joined: Jul 18, 2002
       

Re: Official "Butler to Boston" Thread 

Post#52 » by BR0D1E86 » Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:59 pm

buckboy wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Bradley / Brk 17 / rights to Yabusele / Minnesota 2nd 2017

Is as high as I'd go. Bulls want more id say thanks but no thanks


Pretty much what I think. Both Brooklyn picks is crazy talk in my opinion. He's not worth that.

I think he is worth it, but I'd lose my mind as a Boston fan if they traded both. Change that Minnesota 2nd to the Memphis 1st and that's where I'd draw my line in the sand as a Bulls fan.
DowJones
RealGM
Posts: 15,112
And1: 6,732
Joined: Feb 22, 2008

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston" 

Post#53 » by DowJones » Tue Feb 21, 2017 12:03 am

Off-topic but if Butler is traded then would Chicago release Wade, assuming Wade agrees to waive his player-option for next year? I can't imagine Wade would want to play in a total re-building effort and I can't imagine Chicago would want to keep Wade and hurt their mini-tank for the rest of the year.

Wade gets released and inevitably ends up in Cleveland to help the Cavs go against the W's.
User avatar
buckboy
RealGM
Posts: 12,523
And1: 7,903
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: At the Gettin' Place
     

Re: Official "Butler to Boston" Thread 

Post#54 » by buckboy » Tue Feb 21, 2017 12:57 am

mademan wrote:
buckboy wrote:
BleedGreen1989 wrote:
I really strive to be as non-bias as I can be and this is pretty much where I'm at.


I'm seeing proposals with BKN 17 AND BKN 18/Brown AND Zizic. There's just no way Butler is worth that. He's an excellent player and would seem to help Boston quite a bit, but that's just excessive in my opinion.

Of course given the Plumlee and Cousins deals, who the heck knows I guess?


Because draft picks often get overrated. You can comb through the last 10 draft, and out of 30 players in the top 3 picks, maybe 10 of them have been as good/better than Butler. Thats not a good strike rate, at all. To me, fair value is either both picks or 17pick+Butler. It's hard to get a guy as good Butler; to get a guy as good as him, as young as him, no locker room issues and signed long term....normally impossible, only made possible by the cache of assets the Celtics have


Chicago is taking a risk though, assuming they want the Boston package. If Boston wins the lottery, I think it's going to be like 1 straight up for Butler. Maybe with Smart. If I'm Boston I'm keeping Fultz and trading my other guards.

Of course we don't know that now, so I think there needs to be assets with the 17 pick just due to the uncertainty. I just don't believe those assets are as big as 18 or Brown. If Chicago demanded Zizic I'd bite if I'm Boston but that's about all I'd add.

It should be interesting to see.
"This is my home, this is my city...I'm blessed to be a part of the Milwaukee Bucks for the next 5 years. Let's make these years count. The show goes on, let's get it."
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,569
And1: 32,154
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston" 

Post#55 » by jbk1234 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:00 am

DowJones wrote:Off-topic but if Butler is traded then would Chicago release Wade, assuming Wade agrees to waive his player-option for next year? I can't imagine Wade would want to play in a total re-building effort and I can't imagine Chicago would want to keep Wade and hurt their mini-tank for the rest of the year.

Wade gets released and inevitably ends up in Cleveland to help the Cavs go against the W's.


Wade would have to take a pretty significant discount. They're not going to pay him roughly $8 million so he can play for another team.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 63,880
And1: 62,927
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston" 

Post#56 » by Celts17Pride » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:09 am

Celtics are on pace for 53 wins, max cap space and a Top 4 pick in the draft. Celtics are not desperate to do anything. If Butler price is too high the Celtics just pass. No big deal.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 12,984
And1: 8,285
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
     

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: 

Post#57 » by brackdan70 » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:20 am

T-d0t wrote:Most of these proposals undervalluing Butler, this isn't the Kings you are dealing with. Start with Brown + BKN 2017 pick


I honestly think if it takes both it won't happen. I would consider Zeller, Brown, and 2017 Brooklyn for Butler, but I don't think Ainge will.
Sign here
DowJones
RealGM
Posts: 15,112
And1: 6,732
Joined: Feb 22, 2008

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston" 

Post#58 » by DowJones » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:45 am

jbk1234 wrote:
DowJones wrote:Off-topic but if Butler is traded then would Chicago release Wade, assuming Wade agrees to waive his player-option for next year? I can't imagine Wade would want to play in a total re-building effort and I can't imagine Chicago would want to keep Wade and hurt their mini-tank for the rest of the year.

Wade gets released and inevitably ends up in Cleveland to help the Cavs go against the W's.


Wade would have to take a pretty significant discount. They're not going to pay him roughly $8 million so he can play for another team.


Well the rub is that he opts-out of the final year. Thst is the benefit Chicago gets. If they trade Butler then they certainly wouldn't want Wade opting-in for $25 million.
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 10,822
And1: 3,360
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston" 

Post#59 » by pipfan » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:48 am

I have been saying the fair deal for weeks Butler/Taj for Zeller, Jonas, Brown, BRK 2017, Memphis 2019

Bradley becomes awesome 6th man, Taj would help a ton at the 4. Boston gets to the Finals

Bulls then deal Lopez and Wade (if possible) and pick top 4 and then 7-10. Sac is almost for sure a no go now-but who knows, maybe those guys rally and stay 11-14.
nynj2k
Sophomore
Posts: 158
And1: 49
Joined: Jan 27, 2017
     

Re: Best proposal (containment!) thread: "Butler to Boston" 

Post#60 » by nynj2k » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:04 am

CELTICS GET F Jimmy Butler & F Taj Gibson

BULLS GET F Jae Crowder, G Avery Bradley, F Amir Johnson, Nets 2017 1st Rd pick, a 2019 1st Rd pick, and multiple 2nd Rd picks.

BREAKDOWN
-Celtics: Besides getting the star they want in Butler they get an upgrade at PF with Taj Gibson. This trade should guarantee Boston the 2nd spot and be a real threat to Cleveland.
-Bulls: Get a couple of pretty good players in Crowder and Bradley, a decent player in Johnson who has an expiring contract of $12M which gives Chicago nice cap space this summer and draft picks.

Return to Trades and Transactions