GSW/MIL - NOT a Redd trade

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

EastSideBucksFan
RealGM
Posts: 18,712
And1: 4,490
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Contact:
 

GSW/MIL - NOT a Redd trade 

Post#1 » by EastSideBucksFan » Sat Jan 5, 2008 7:17 pm

Here's something I was pondering, it doesn't involved huge names but it fills needs.


GSW are said to be looking for a point guard and it's also no secret that they only have ONE center who actually play minutes. This trade gives them depth for the playoffs and gives them defense in both the backcourt and the frontcourt.

Obviously the sticking points are the contracts that the Bucks are looking to unload, but Bell's deal isn't crazy. He's only making 3.5M per year and Gadz is making $6M which if you look at salaries is not that bloated when you see what some other centers make.

GSW also does this because they don't give up any pieces that are useful to them right now.


Successful Trade Scenario
Congratulations on a successful trade.
There were BYC players involved in this trade, so this trade is subject to the BYC provisions of the CBA. Due to Milwaukee and Golden State being over the cap, the 25% trade rule is invoked. Milwaukee and Golden State had to be no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out unless trade exceptions were used for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
Trade ID
Trade ID #4389071
Every trade made by fans is allocated a unique Trade ID which you can share with friends and fellow basketball fans to allow them to see your trade scenario.



Try Another Trade or visit our Trade Forum.
Milwaukee Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: +3.8 ppg, +1.6 rpg, and -2.0 apg.
Incoming Players

DJ Mbenga
7-0 C from Congo (Foreign)
1.2 ppg, 1.9 rpg, 0.3 apg in 8.1 minutes

Austin Croshere
6-9 PF from Providence
3.7 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 0.4 apg in 8.8 minutes

Mickael Pietrus
6-6 SG / SF from France (Foreign)
6.0 ppg, 2.9 rpg, 0.7 apg in 17.6 minutes


Outgoing Players

Charlie Bell
6-3 PG from Michigan State
4.1 ppg, 2.4 rpg, 3.1 apg in 20.3 minutes

Dan Gadzuric
6-11 C from UCLA
3.0 ppg, 2.8 rpg, 0.3 apg in 10.2 minutes
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 49,832
And1: 23,143
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

 

Post#2 » by Baddy Chuck » Sat Jan 5, 2008 7:19 pm

Gadz could thrive in their system. Bell could turn around his shooting % and become a good player in the system also. Thats the IFS though, I dont think Golden State is willing to "risk" 10+ million.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,901
And1: 26,426
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#3 » by trwi7 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 7:21 pm

GSW won't do it.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
EastSideBucksFan
RealGM
Posts: 18,712
And1: 4,490
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Contact:
 

 

Post#4 » by EastSideBucksFan » Sat Jan 5, 2008 7:22 pm

RingtheBell wrote:Gadz could thrive in their system. Bell could turn around his shooting % and become a good player in the system also. Thats the IFS though, I dont think Golden State is willing to "risk" 10+ million.



Mullin is a pretty decent GM and I'll be honest I don't know their cap situation.


But their depth is horrible. Depending on their mindset I would think they would be looking to acquire players who can help them in the playoffs.

This sends three castaways off their team and gives them two players who can step into their rotation. Bell can give minutes at the one and two and Gadzuric can run in this offense all day long.

Not to mention Biedrins is playing with no contract. Should he not return, Gadz could potentially give them 75% of what Biedrins is.
User avatar
Simulack
RealGM
Posts: 11,300
And1: 4
Joined: Jan 03, 2002

 

Post#5 » by Simulack » Sat Jan 5, 2008 7:23 pm

Really bad deal for the Warriors.
dom80e
Analyst
Posts: 3,195
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 14, 2004

 

Post#6 » by dom80e » Sat Jan 5, 2008 7:48 pm

GS needs money to resign Ellis and Biedrins. Plus Barnes, Azubuike and Pietrus are all FA's as well.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,047
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#7 » by loserX » Sat Jan 5, 2008 8:00 pm

You might be able to convince the Warriors to take Bell for expirings...but not Gadzuric. His contract is just too ugly.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,901
And1: 26,426
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#8 » by trwi7 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 8:04 pm

loserX wrote:His contract is just too ugly.


Oh yeah well, you're ugly. :wink:
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,047
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#9 » by loserX » Sat Jan 5, 2008 8:06 pm

trwi7 wrote:Oh yeah well, you're ugly. :wink:


Nevertheless, my comment stands ;)
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,901
And1: 26,426
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#10 » by trwi7 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 8:08 pm

loserX wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Nevertheless, my comment stands ;)


As does mine and since you didn't deny it I can only believe that my comment is correct. 8)
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,047
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#11 » by loserX » Sat Jan 5, 2008 8:14 pm

trwi7 wrote:As does mine and since you didn't deny it I can only believe that my comment is correct. 8)


That was my point as well...being ugly doesn't make me wrong :D
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,266
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#12 » by skones » Sat Jan 5, 2008 11:15 pm

I'd be all over it, but it's awful for Golden State.
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

 

Post#13 » by old rem » Sun Jan 6, 2008 1:19 am

[quote="EastSideBucksFan"][/quote]

The Warriors depth is good....we just have a coach who'd rather run our regulars to death than PLAY the 3 rd 1 picks on the bench. We sure don't want to pay Gadzuric.

Barnes averages about 9 a game over this year and last. Pietrus was over 11 a game last year,Azubuike is over 11 a game this year Each of those has had plenty of 20+ scoring games,has had some 10 + rebound games has started.

B Wright was the #9 pick this draft,Bellinelli was #18.

The Warriors got burned with overpaid contracts and have gone extreme in avoiding getting any more.

Bell? might be interested. Gadz? No chance.
CENSORED... No comment.
User avatar
crzy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,224
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 10, 2006
Location: San Francisco

 

Post#14 » by crzy » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:03 am

We're not taking on Gadz or Bell's contract. Milwaukee is like the 2005 Warriors, just littered with dreadful contracts.
Image
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,408
And1: 3,801
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

 

Post#15 » by gswhoops » Sun Jan 6, 2008 12:41 pm

crzyyafrican wrote:We're not taking on Gadz or Bell's contract.

Pretty much. Mullin has jumped off the bad contract bandwagon and we have 3 major resignings this offseason (Baron/Biedrins/Ellis) as well as some smaller rotation players needing new deals (Azubuike, Barnes, Pietrus, O'Bryant).

The only way the W's take on a contract that has more than one year (i.e. not an expiring) would be if the player we're getting is a legit stud in a deal that would be impossible to turn down, or if they have a contract that is very small (no more than $3-4M a year). Bell and Gadz qualify under neither condition.
turk3d
RealGM
Posts: 36,652
And1: 1,277
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Location: Javale McGee, Dubs X Factor

 

Post#16 » by turk3d » Sun Jan 6, 2008 2:34 pm

gswhoops wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Pretty much. Mullin has jumped off the bad contract bandwagon and we have 3 major resignings this offseason (Baron/Biedrins/Ellis) as well as some smaller rotation players needing new deals (Azubuike, Barnes, Pietrus, O'Bryant).

The only way the W's take on a contract that has more than one year (i.e. not an expiring) would be if the player we're getting is a legit stud in a deal that would be impossible to turn down, or if they have a contract that is very small (no more than $3-4M a year). Bell and Gadz qualify under neither condition.


+1
Draymond Green: Exemplifies Warrior Leadership, Hustle, Desire, Versatility, Toughness, fearlessness, Grit, Heart,Team Spirit, Sacrifice
Image
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 93,350
And1: 24,580
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#17 » by hermes » Sun Jan 6, 2008 3:57 pm

Simulack wrote:Really bad deal for the Warriors.

Return to Trades and Transactions