Milwaukee-Portland

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

Village Idiot
General Manager
Posts: 9,249
And1: 2,001
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: location, location
     

Milwaukee-Portland 

Post#1 » by Village Idiot » Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:44 pm

With Redd out for the year it's pretty clear that Bucks won't make the playoffs this year despite a promising start.

This isn't the first time I've posted this deal but now it seems like an obviously good deal for both teams.

Milwaukee trades:

Richard Jefferson
Salary: $13,200,000 Years Remaining: 3
PTS: 17.3 REB: 4.8 AST: 2.2 PER: 14.08

Francisco Elson
Salary: $1,700,000 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 2.6 REB: 2.4 AST: 0.5 PER: 8.80

Portland trades:

Travis Outlaw
Salary: $4,000,000 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 11.5 REB: 4.0 AST: 1.0 PER: 14.39

Raef LaFrentz
Salary: $12,722,500 Years Remaining: 1

2009 1st- top 3 protected

Richard Jefferson would be an ideal SF for the Blazers. His scoring ability, leadership and playoff experience is just what the Blazers need.

The Bucks get a decent replacement for RJ in Outlaw and save a ton of money both this year and the next two.
"There are no right answers to wrong questions." - Ursula K. Le Guin
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 35,489
And1: 7,328
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Milwaukee-Portland 

Post#2 » by Wizenheimer » Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:52 pm

as a blazer fan, I'd reject that deal.

It's overpaying for someone like RJ who has such an enormous contract that runs past the 2010 off-season. And by overpaying I mean you're giving up essentially 2 expiring contracts for a major salary impact contract like RJ's. And adding the draft pick is unnecessary IMO.

the most I'd offer would be Martell Webster, Lafrentz & the 2010 1st for RJ. Elson isn't nedded in that trade for salary purposes and it's just dumb for portland roster-wise to give up their backup PF for yet another SF when webster would still be on the roster

so no deal on the original trade
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,876
And1: 26,395
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Milwaukee-Portland 

Post#3 » by trwi7 » Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:58 pm

Deal. No take backs.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 49,657
And1: 22,790
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Milwaukee-Portland 

Post#4 » by Baddy Chuck » Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:29 pm

To get Outlaw and a first I'd make the filler CV who would help fill some of Outlaws scoring off the bench. Doubt Portland does it still though.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 55,260
And1: 14,651
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Milwaukee-Portland 

Post#5 » by shrink » Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:33 pm

I think Jefferson's $15 mil player option for the valueable 2010-11 season would mean that POR would not give Outlaw and a 1st. Maybe Webster with Raef.
BigSkyBlazerFan
Sophomore
Posts: 229
And1: 2
Joined: May 21, 2008
Location: Montana

Re: Milwaukee-Portland 

Post#6 » by BigSkyBlazerFan » Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:15 am

shrink wrote:I think Jefferson's $15 mil player option for the valueable 2010-11 season would mean that POR would not give Outlaw and a 1st. Maybe Webster with Raef.


Webster and Raef are more attractive trade pieces to me.
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,523
And1: 2,083
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: Milwaukee-Portland 

Post#7 » by DaVoiceMaster » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:29 am

It'd have to be Webster cuz Portland has no one to backup Aldridge at PF... no one that is any good anyways. If Outlaw were to go, perhaps the Bucks don't pick up the option this summer and Outlaw can resign with the Blazers? hahahahaha
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
User avatar
why22
Analyst
Posts: 3,530
And1: 16
Joined: Nov 26, 2008
Location: T Dot

Re: Milwaukee-Portland 

Post#8 » by why22 » Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:05 pm

na portland overpays, i say lafrentz, webster and pick
Basketball_Jones wrote:BC holding Casey accountable would go like this:

BC: so I see you played Andrea quite a bit there when he was struggling
Casey: yeah I know, we needed spacing
BC: play him more (walks away)
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,579
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Milwaukee-Portland 

Post#9 » by Ruzious » Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:32 pm

why22 wrote:na portland overpays, i say lafrentz, webster and pick

I think Bucks would actually do this - because there's not much else they can do to be able to afford to re-sign Villa and perhaps Sessions.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Takuya Kimura
Junior
Posts: 454
And1: 12
Joined: Oct 05, 2008

Re: Milwaukee-Portland 

Post#10 » by Takuya Kimura » Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:53 pm

how bout RJ/Charlie V for Raef/Frye ?
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,579
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Milwaukee-Portland 

Post#11 » by Ruzious » Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:14 pm

Takuya Kimura wrote:how bout RJ/Charlie V for Raef/Frye ?

Senator Kohl would not get re-elected. :lol:
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Spykes
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,738
And1: 16
Joined: Mar 15, 2004
Location: Paddy's Pub

Re: Milwaukee-Portland 

Post#12 » by Spykes » Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:27 pm

RingtheBell wrote:To get Outlaw and a first I'd make the filler CV who would help fill some of Outlaws scoring off the bench. Doubt Portland does it still though.


That's a pretty competitive offer imo. CV probably wouldn't have any problem filling Outlaw's spot at the backup forward position.

Portland would still be left with a pretty big logjam at SF with Jefferson, Batum and Webster though. Then Portland has to resign CV, which makes this idea less attractive.

Personally, I'd rather just make the deal as simple as possible which means I still like the Raef + Webster + Pick for RJ deal the best, but the CV for Outlaw version is interesting.

Return to Trades and Transactions