Arounde Ye Olde League 11/29

Jez2983 · Post #16 » by **Jez2983** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:46 am

paulpressey25 wrote:Bogut for Cousins, Dalembert and Landry.

Cousins and Jennings on the same team?

You must love fun!

AussieBuck · Post #17 » by **AussieBuck** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:48 am

paulpressey25 wrote:Bogut for Cousins, Dalembert and Landry.

You want to be 25th in offense and 20th in D?

Post #18 » by **blkout** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:49 am

The Milwaukee Kings, combining for 20 wins

Post #19 » by **paulpressey25** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:49 am

Skiles can tame him.

Dalembert and Landry can provide about what Bogut will this year, maybe more.

This is the type of trade a team like the Bucks need to pull off to take a leap up. Might not work but could a home run.

AussieBuck · Post #20 » by **AussieBuck** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:51 am

How is it a home run swapping the second best defender in the league for a good post defender and 2 of the bottom 10 big men defenders in the league? You couldn't possibly play Landry and Cousins together.

paul · Post #21 » by **paul** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:52 am

I've been sitting here for 2 minutes trying to figure out how to respond.

Post #22 » by **paulpressey25** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:54 am

paul wrote:I've been sitting here for 2 minutes trying to figure out how to respond.

You guys would love it. The West Coast games would start two hours later in the day. 8-)

Seriously, Cousins may bust but he is the type of talent you take a run on if you have the opportunity.

Landry looked fine to me in Houston when in a good system.

Put the trade idea up on the Kings board. See what they say.

Jez2983 · Post #23 » by **Jez2983** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:56 am

I would think getting rid of Salmons and Gooden would be JH's most important task.

Turk Nowitzki · Post #24 » by **Turk Nowitzki** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:56 am

Nobody will trade for Bogut while he is broken and if he's healthy he's too good to trade. Tough spot.

paul · Post #25 » by **paul** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:57 am

paulpressey25 wrote:
paul wrote:I've been sitting here for 2 minutes trying to figure out how to respond.

You guys would love it. The West Coast games would start two hours later in the day.

Seriously, Cousins may bust but he is the type of talent you take a run on if you have the opportunity.

Landry looked fine to me in Houston when in a good system.

Put the trade idea up on the Kings board. See what they say.

Landry and Dalembert are expiring contracts. What you are proposing is Cousins for Bogut straight up with salary filler. Seriously.

And no I won't be putting a trade I think is an epic fail up on another teams board, if you want to, you do it.

Post #26 » by **paulpressey25** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:58 am

Jez2983 wrote:I would think getting rid of Salmons and Gooden would be JH's most important task.

I agree. The problem is there is no way out there IMO. I'm not sure we could even get Nocioni or Francisco Garcia for those guys at the moment.

paul · Post #27 » by **paul** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:00 am

Turk Nowitzki wrote:Nobody will trade for Bogut while he is broken and if he's healthy he's too good to trade. Tough spot.

The Kings would blow you under the table during the dinner they are paying for to do that deal today. They know they've got a MASSIVE headache in Cousins just like they know neither Daly or Landry are staying after they expire.

Rest assured, they do it instantly.

PackerBacker89 · Post #28 » by **PackerBacker89** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:00 am

paul wrote:
paulpressey25 wrote:
paul wrote:I've been sitting here for 2 minutes trying to figure out how to respond.

You guys would love it. The West Coast games would start two hours later in the day.

Seriously, Cousins may bust but he is the type of talent you take a run on if you have the opportunity.

Landry looked fine to me in Houston when in a good system.

Put the trade idea up on the Kings board. See what they say.

Landry and Dalembert are expiring contracts. What you are proposing is Cousins for Bogut straight up with salary filler. Seriously.

And no I won't be putting a trade I think is an epic fail up on another teams board, if you want to, you do it.

I just threw up in my mouth a little.

Post #29 » by **paulpressey25** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:03 am

Landry and Dalembert are expiring contracts. What you are proposing is Cousins for Bogut straight up with salary filler. Seriously.

And no I won't be putting a trade I think is an epic fail up on another teams board, if you want to, you do it.

Herb and John will have no problem spending the Redd money to re up at least one of those guys.

My thought on putting it up on the Sacto board is the fact they would likely turn it down. I.e. Perceptions of the value of Bogut differ greatly on this board versus league wide. The injury, offensive fail and now back spasms would scare a lot of teams off from offering any type of good asset for him.

DH34Phan · Post #30 » by **DH34Phan** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:03 am

paul wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:Nobody will trade for Bogut while he is broken and if he's healthy he's too good to trade. Tough spot.

Rest assured, they do it instantly.

Cuz Bogut is just so awesome.

It wouldn't be a no brainer. Cousins can easily be better than Bogut, and Landry is a very solid PF.

randy84 · Post #31 » by **randy84** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:04 am

I would love this trade just to see Skiles mess with Cousin's head.

paul · Post #32 » by **paul** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:06 am

DH34Phan wrote:
paul wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:Nobody will trade for Bogut while he is broken and if he's healthy he's too good to trade. Tough spot.

Rest assured, they do it instantly.

Cuz Bogut is just so awesome.

It wouldn't be a no brainer. Cousins can easily be better than Bogut, and Landry is a very solid PF.

No, because Bogut is significantly better than Cousins and isn't a complete nutjob like they already no Cousins is, I believe he's now been fined twice and booted from practice a month into his rookie season. He's got (offensive) talent but they'll cut bait with this kid within a season, if they can get an allstar level big out of him they'll take it and never look back. Landry is fine, but he's an expiring contract for the sake of this deal.

It would be the very definition of a no brainer. Unless someone was insane enough to offer more I suppose.

AussieBuck · Post #33 » by **AussieBuck** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:06 am

Harden, Ibaka and a 1st >>>this idea.

Post #34 » by **blkout** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:07 am

Landry's numbers this season aren't much better than Gooden's and his rebounding is around the same level as Marcus Thornton's.

paul · Post #35 » by **paul** » Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:08 am

paulpressey25 wrote:

Landry and Dalembert are expiring contracts. What you are proposing is Cousins for Bogut straight up with salary filler. Seriously.

And no I won't be putting a trade I think is an epic fail up on another teams board, if you want to, you do it.

Herb and John will have no problem spending the Redd money to re up at least one of those guys.

My thought on putting it up on the Sacto board is the fact they would likely turn it down. I.e. Perceptions of the value of Bogut differ greatly on this board versus league wide. The injury, offensive fail and now back spasms would scare a lot of teams off from offering any type of good asset for him.

You always do that, why do I care what some ignorant Kings fans think of Bogut Press? Isn't it GM's who make trades?