LUKE23 wrote:I think it's probably because we're a better team without Ellis on the floor. Just because a player plays, it doesn't matter if he's actually hurting you instead of helping. It's like arguing that Gooden being healthy is a positive and not a negative. Udoh is a definite positive from the deal, but he's not getting enough minutes to counteract Monta's negative impact right now.
Now, if we turn Monta into value the trade gets a whole lot better. I'm just not sure we can or will do that.
How come I always hear that trading for Ellis was a win now move, while at the same time him not playing at all would help the team win more games? How does GSW get credit for tanking while trading Ellis? If this theory were true the Bucks would have lost more games after the Ellis trade and GSW would have won more. You can't have it both ways.