GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:paul wrote:
There there rolly, we'll have a middle aged nobody for you to flip flop on again before you know it.
like bogut?
Oooooooooh it's a deep burn!
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:paul wrote:
There there rolly, we'll have a middle aged nobody for you to flip flop on again before you know it.
like bogut?
paul wrote:GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:paul wrote:
There there rolly, we'll have a middle aged nobody for you to flip flop on again before you know it.
like bogut?
Oooooooooh it's a deep burn!
MikeIsGood wrote:europa wrote:Max Green wrote:Guys supported and defended Hammond until he traded their favorite player(s).
I was critical of Hammond long before he traded Bogut, who was my favorite player on the team at the time. I don't want to speak for Paul but I know he was too. So your statement doesn't really mesh with the facts with some of us at least.
I also have never once supported Hammond ever. If anything, I've been a hater. I've barely even given him credit for what he has done right.
ETA: I pretty much gave up on him when we were stupid enough to resign Salmons. That was utterly moronic.
paulpressey25 wrote:DrugBust wrote:Be pissed that the $WAG twins are still on the team. That's what I read when I see people bitching about the current state of the team.
We absolutely screwed ourselves today by not monetizing the value of Jennings and particularly Monta. Monta's value is now zero.
europa wrote:Max Green wrote:Guys supported and defended Hammond until he traded their favorite player(s).
I was critical of Hammond long before he traded Bogut, who was my favorite player on the team at the time. I don't want to speak for Paul but I know he was too. So your statement doesn't really mesh with the facts with some of us at least.
paul wrote:GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:paul wrote:So just as a warning, there's going to be some condescending posting coming from me for a while.
consider us warned and not surprised in the least
There there rolly, we'll have a middle aged nobody for you to flip flop on again before you know it.
humanrefutation wrote:sneakerdust wrote:
And Scalabrine drives to the basket and is rejected, goes down like a sack of potatoes, Pitino on the sideline laughing his ass off olive oil flying off his head onto the floor and oooh down goes Jennings like a bucket full of Roscoe's the ball goes flying toward the sidelines and Ayon dives across the border into the expensive seats where our honored guests from the INS are tonight.
Equal opportunity racism is still racism, FYI.
paul wrote:MikeIsGood wrote:I also have never once supported Hammond ever. If anything, I've been a hater. I've barely even given him credit for what he has done right.
ETA: I pretty much gave up on him when we were stupid enough to resign Salmons. That was utterly moronic.
What's got two thumbs and we stupid enough to support that contract?
LUKE23 wrote:Umm, Alexander had shown NOTHING at the time we traded him. It's a LOT different.
El Duderino wrote:I've seen others say this and while i wanted Monta gone as much as anyone else, how much value did he really have around the league?
Nets Offered Lopez To Bucks For Ellis
Mar 16, 2012 3:41 PM EDT
Following Milwaukee's acquisition of Monta Ellis, the Nets offered a trade of Brook Lopez, according to Ric Bucher while on KNBR Radio.
The Bucks turned down that trade and decided to keep Ellis.
Ellis is known to be a player Dwight Howard wants to play with.
Via Ric Bucher/ESPN
MikeIsGood wrote:paul wrote:MikeIsGood wrote:I also have never once supported Hammond ever. If anything, I've been a hater. I've barely even given him credit for what he has done right.
ETA: I pretty much gave up on him when we were stupid enough to resign Salmons. That was utterly moronic.
What's got two thumbs and we stupid enough to support that contract?
That was when I stopped posting so much. I was all sorts of infuriated that day. I was completely beside myself. Not surprised, but still ridiculously pissed off.
LUKE23 wrote:DrugBust wrote:Question for ya'll:
What constitutes an overpay for Redick? Just looking for numbers and years.
Anything over 4/28.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:LUKE23 wrote:Umm, Alexander had shown NOTHING at the time we traded him. It's a LOT different.
thats just your perspective and a bit of semantics. both guys were in the doghouse for whatever was happening off the court and in practice. if anything the difference is between slamons and redick at the time of the trade. salmons was stinking it up and redicks been balling.
if redick makes a difference i dont have a sliver of a doubt we'll have every oppurtunity in the offseason that we had with salmons as far as a contract goes. it would be hard for redick to trump what salmons gave us but theres no question theres more expectation from him as he arrives.
LUKE23 wrote:Umm, Alexander had shown NOTHING at the time we traded him. It's a LOT different.
humanrefutation wrote:You know, I'm reading these arguments and I can't believe we're really arguing about the following:
1. Tobias has shown potential, is only 20 years old. Could he turn into a bust? Absolutely. But he's also shown some offensive ability, especially in the block, and is only in his second year.
2. JJ Redick is not going to win us a title.
3. We could have signed JJ Redick in the offseason. This trade gives us no real advantage in that department.
4. We still are stuck with Monta Ellis and did not sell on our other expendable asset, the expiring contract of Sam Dalembert.
Is there anything on that list that is debatable?