The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
- Matches Malone
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,664
- And1: 20,680
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
[tweet]https://twitter.com/GeryWoelfel/status/653657325430022144[/tweet]
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
- BobbyLight
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,027
- And1: 1,546
- Joined: Jul 29, 2004
- Location: Milwaukee, WI
- Contact:
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
"Internal talks" and talking to Larry Sanders are two very different things. I'd probably internally speak to myself about Larry Sanders if we had no center, as well.
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,200
- And1: 1,748
- Joined: Jun 17, 2009
- Location: Out in the Driftless Area
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
Matches Malone wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/GeryWoelfel/status/653657325430022144[/tweet]
Good luck to any team that signs him.... The risk of Larry changing his mind and going AWOL again has to scare the bejeebers out of any GM, regardless of his on court capabilities. I wonder how much sandbagging of the contract with team-protective measures would be allowed under the CBA?
*******************************************************
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
- Sauce Boss
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,963
- And1: 851
- Joined: Nov 25, 2008
- Location: Madison, WI
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
BobbyLight wrote:"Internal talks" and talking to Larry Sanders are two very different things. I'd probably internally speak to myself about Larry Sanders if we had no center, as well.
BobbyLight wrote:I'd probably internally speak to myself about Larry Sanders if we had no center, as well.
BobbyLight wrote:I'd probably internally speak to myself
BobbyLight wrote:I speak to myself
Stephen Jackson wrote:"I got a video off the French Montana beat that I shot in the condo. The condo was laid, man. I had a gate with a key...Yeah, Milwaukee is a nice place but the team sucked."
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
- BobbyLight
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,027
- And1: 1,546
- Joined: Jul 29, 2004
- Location: Milwaukee, WI
- Contact:
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
Like you've never spoken to yourself. About Larry Sanders.
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks
- Posts: 60,960
- And1: 26,074
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
Yeah, you guys are right. I'm sure Cuban has made the call. Dallas is the logical choice to want to take a flyer on Sanders.
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
- Baddy Chuck
- RealGM
- Posts: 49,681
- And1: 22,817
- Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
Honestly wouldn't surprise me if it was the Lakers.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,712
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
Larry Sanders going to be a prime example for the owners in the next CBA negotiations.
If things were structured right, any team that wants him should have to trade the Bucks for him and the $5M salary he's costing us. It will be interesting to see if he comes back to the NBA. Definitely will anger me a bit to see him come back soon if he does.
But, Gery saying a western conference team is having internal discussions and Larry Sanders actually having interest and ability to return are two very different things.
If things were structured right, any team that wants him should have to trade the Bucks for him and the $5M salary he's costing us. It will be interesting to see if he comes back to the NBA. Definitely will anger me a bit to see him come back soon if he does.
But, Gery saying a western conference team is having internal discussions and Larry Sanders actually having interest and ability to return are two very different things.
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
-
- Junior
- Posts: 312
- And1: 177
- Joined: Apr 29, 2010
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
Not sure if this means anything, but just throwing this in here:
[tweet]https://twitter.com/LarrySanders/status/653702606196371456[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/LarrySanders/status/653702606196371456[/tweet]
Nappy Gilmore ™Verified account
@LarrySanders
Just landed in Texas...
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,712
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
Looks like Gery might be on to something here.
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
- Wisky4life
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,958
- And1: 1,073
- Joined: Feb 05, 2014
- Contact:
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
Could it be the Rockets?
“We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees.” –Jason Kidd
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
- VooDoo7
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,168
- And1: 20,847
- Joined: Jan 14, 2012
- Location: WI
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
^Not sure if Larry Sanders or Wesley Snipes.
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
- Aaron It Out
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,805
- And1: 3,101
- Joined: Jun 27, 2008
- Location: Black Mercedes
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
Was about to say I think its Houston before I saw that pic.
EastSideBucksFan wrote:At some point this board is going to have to drop their stupid bullsht agendas and just enjoy the team for once.
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,327
- And1: 2,750
- Joined: Mar 08, 2010
- Contact:
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
Larry's Instagram has stepped up the crazy lately I'll say that.
I honestly would be happy to see him back in the league and healthy. Only thing I would like is the money we owe him being waived. He chose to walk away from a contract and it cost us, if he decides to return so quickly it seems bull that we have to keep paying while he signs somewhere else.
Anyway as ESBF posted it could be a catalyst for change next time well.
I honestly would be happy to see him back in the league and healthy. Only thing I would like is the money we owe him being waived. He chose to walk away from a contract and it cost us, if he decides to return so quickly it seems bull that we have to keep paying while he signs somewhere else.
Anyway as ESBF posted it could be a catalyst for change next time well.
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,915
- And1: 1,467
- Joined: Dec 13, 2011
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
VooDoo7 wrote:^Not sure if Larry Sanders or Wesley Snipes.
Well they're both crazy.
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
- Zeezprah
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,539
- And1: 1,569
- Joined: Apr 16, 2014
- Location: How can the Bucks be real if our eyes aren't real?
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
Prince12 wrote:Larry's Instagram has stepped up the crazy lately I'll say that.
I honestly would be happy to see him back in the league and healthy. Only thing I would like is the money we owe him being waived. He chose to walk away from a contract and it cost us, if he decides to return so quickly it seems bull that we have to keep paying while he signs somewhere else.
Anyway as ESBF posted it could be a catalyst for change next time well.
you'd think our owners would've made him sign something that if he came back into the league in the next 5 years (or whatever) the settlement would be ripped up or something.
because that would be major bs.
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,915
- And1: 1,467
- Joined: Dec 13, 2011
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
EastSideBucksFan wrote:Larry Sanders going to be a prime example for the owners in the next CBA negotiations.
If things were structured right, any team that wants him should have to trade the Bucks for him and the $5M salary he's costing us. It will be interesting to see if he comes back to the NBA. Definitely will anger me a bit to see him come back soon if he does.
But, Gery saying a western conference team is having internal discussions and Larry Sanders actually having interest and ability to return are two very different things.
I still do not understand how a player can just decide not to show up to work anymore, and get paid to go away.
Why wouldn't every player who wants out of a contract somewhere just do what Larry did?
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
- worthlessBucks
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,451
- And1: 4,826
- Joined: Jan 26, 2005
- Location: Bucks Logo
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
Sherman Douglas wrote:I still do not understand how a player can just decide not to show up to work anymore, and get paid to go away.
Why wouldn't every player who wants out of a contract somewhere just do what Larry did?
Get PR to play on the sympathies of mental health. A done deal.
Disregard Larry, but I've always had a real problem with the guaranteed deals for those babies who pout their way to new teams.
Go Bucks!
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
- Turk Nowitzki
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,651
- And1: 9,936
- Joined: Feb 26, 2010
- Location: on the Hellmouth
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
It's going to be so gross when a team signs Larry to a cheap one year deal.
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,255
- And1: 356
- Joined: Nov 16, 2009
Re: The Larry Sanders conundrum (ESPN story pg 174)
Treebeard wrote:Matches Malone wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/GeryWoelfel/status/653657325430022144[/tweet]
Good luck to any team that signs him.... The risk of Larry changing his mind and going AWOL again has to scare the bejeebers out of any GM, regardless of his on court capabilities. I wonder how much sandbagging of the contract with team-protective measures would be allowed under the CBA?
if you get him for the minimum its super low-risk/high reward