jakecronus8 wrote:Vaughn didn't make sense to me at the time, and now that it looks like we may strike out on big men, it really looks stupid with Portis sitting there.
And how does it look now?
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
jakecronus8 wrote:Vaughn didn't make sense to me at the time, and now that it looks like we may strike out on big men, it really looks stupid with Portis sitting there.
WimpyDeer wrote:And how does it look now?
Chuck Diesel wrote:I think Vaughn will be a consistent 8-10 point scorer by January.
Chuck Diesel wrote:Yeah, I half jokingly wondered if we drafted Deron Lamb after the first summer league game but definitely changed my tune after seeing him twice live in Vegas.
RRyder823 wrote:Worst and probably best case for Vaughn this year is a guy when we need extra spacing in our 2nd unit can come in and we can just park him in the corner.
jakecronus8 wrote:Dekker looks like a better pick at the moment, but Shad's got some time to prove me wrong.
Bernman wrote:crkone wrote:It's extremely likely Vaughn will learn and play the way Kidd likes it. I'd you don't think Jabari or Giannis adapted to Kidd's style I'll just stop right her. I really have nothing else to say.
We're not talking about adapting to styles, we're talking about ability/team impact. Giannis and Jabari were great prospects before they entered Kidd's office. Forget what I even consider him, the average opinion of Vaughn before the Bucks drafted him 17th was low 1st, high 2nd. So that's where we're at right now. Not Giannis being considered possibly the best prospect in his (albeit weak) class and Jabari #2 in his strong one, before Kidd started working with them.
Bernman wrote:WimpyDeer wrote:And how does it look now?
Not him, but passing on Grant for Vaughn looks even stupider to me now that we got Monroe. We need shooting from the 1 spot, not 2, and Vaughn was an immature frosh while Grant a mature senior whose game had already rounded out. I don't think Vaughn will ever be as good as Grant, and he's far less useful now.
Also, until further events maybe, stupider passing on Dekker now that we got Monroe and are rid of Dudley. Having that quality, mature 3/4 prospect would feel pretty darn good right now. What daddy wanted is irrelevant. Dekker would have gotten a chance for pt immediately, is a Bucks' fan, and a nice guy. He'd have gotten over it real quick.
chonestown wrote:jakecronus8 wrote:Dekker looks like a better pick at the moment, but Shad's got some time to prove me wrong.
He didn't play. He must have wowed you with his headshot.