ATL - PG13 to Thunder

Baddy Chuck · Post #1 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:15 am

Read on Twitter

Trust the process.

blazza18 · Post #2 » by **blazza18** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:20 am

blazza18 wrote:Sixers are going to get Fultz because Jason Kidd thought MCW was our point guard of the future.

Baddy Chuck · Post #3 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:22 am

blazza18 wrote:
blazza18 wrote:Sixers are going to get Fultz because Jason Kidd thought MCW was our point guard of the future.

"And they said we couldn't build a contender."

MrHoneycutt · Post #4 » by **MrHoneycutt** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:32 am

birlik54 · Post #5 » by **birlik54** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:38 am

blazza18 wrote:
blazza18 wrote:Sixers are going to get Fultz because Jason Kidd thought MCW was our point guard of the future.

And now Kidd probably has more influence in the front office than he's ever had....

Sent from my LGLS991 using RealGM mobile app

ackypoo · Post #6 » by **ackypoo** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:53 am

moosecock to boston.

i hope this totally screws up their future.

not that im cheering for philly...

Baddy Chuck · Post #7 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:56 am

ackypoo wrote:moosecock to boston.

#3, a Lakers 1st and a Kings 1st. Yeah, I'm not sure we're talking moosecock here.

Sky Bucks · Post #8 » by **Sky Bucks** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:57 am

Have no fear, Horst will lead us to the promised land...

worthlessBucks · Post #9 » by **worthlessBucks** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:06 am

That is an absolute ton. Unbelievable for Ainge. Believable for Colangelo. 2 spots where the differences are kind of negligible and beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

emunney · Post #10 » by **emunney** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:10 am

What's the protection on these picks? I'm guessing nothing crazy. This is very bad news for the Eastern conference.

FlagsFlyForever · Post #11 » by **FlagsFlyForever** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:11 am

This seems like a great deal for Boston but what are the protections? Both of these teams are on the right track. In a couple years, the East will be like the 80's all over again with Boston, Philly, and Milwaukee on top.

ackypoo · Post #12 » by **ackypoo** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:12 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
ackypoo wrote:moosecock to boston.

#3, a Lakers 1st and a Kings 1st. Yeah, I'm not sure we're talking moosecock here.

im not suggesting that boston is receiving moosecock. im wishing them moosecock.

BroncoBuck · Post #13 » by **BroncoBuck** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:40 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
ackypoo wrote:moosecock to boston.

#3, a Lakers 1st and a Kings 1st. Yeah, I'm not sure we're talking moosecock here.

It's actually only #3 and one of those other picks. Lakers if it falls between 2-5, Kings if the Lakers pick falls outside of that. No clue what Danny was thinking with this trade.

RRyder823 · Post #14 » by **RRyder823** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:41 am

Looks like a great deal for both teams. If Boston truly wasn't sold on Fultz this pretty much guarantees 2 top 6 picks next season with an additional future pick from Philly. Kinda of a no brainer if they didn't really want Fultz

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using RealGM mobile app

trwi7 · Post #15 » by **trwi7** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 4:05 am

SAS criticizing Hinkie for having the Sixers throw away seasons while not acknowledging how the Sixers had enough assets to trade up to #1. :lol:

trwi7 · Post #16 » by **trwi7** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 4:07 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
blazza18 wrote:
blazza18 wrote:Sixers are going to get Fultz because Jason Kidd thought MCW was our point guard of the future.

"And they said we couldn't build a contender."

For real, this post better get 50 And 1s at minimum. Hilarious.

BroncoBuck · Post #17 » by **BroncoBuck** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 4:09 am

Boston really outsmarted themselves with this one. You have the #1 pick in the draft, take the BPA. IT, Bradley, Smart and Rozier aren't guys who are going to stop me from taking a guard if he is the best player in the draft. It looked like a decent haul at first glance when it was reported to include the Lakers and Sac picks no protections, but now that it most likely is just the 19 Kings pick (odds of Lakers being 2-5 is ridiculous) and #3 I really have no clue what Ainge was thinking. Kings are trending upward and have two high picks this year. Terrible haul to give up the #1 pick for.

Post #18 » by **paulpressey25** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 4:20 am

First we have Ibaka and Norm Powell flush us out of the playoffs.

Now the Lakers pick gets flipped to get #1 overall.

I'm sure Horst will fix all this.

Nowak008 · Post #19 » by **Nowak008** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 4:22 am

In Woj's article it says the Lakers pick is protected 2-5... I thought the pick was unprotected? He says if it doesn't convey it becomes the 2019 Kings pick.

Baddy Chuck · Post #20 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sun Jun 18, 2017 4:24 am

Nowak008 wrote:In Woj's article it says the Lakers pick is protected 2-5... I thought the pick was unprotected? He says if it doesn't convey it becomes the 2019 Kings pick.

You can adjust protection in the new CBA.