You've made a big thing out of logic here and tried to ridicule Paul, but where's the logic to what you said?
Well anytime someone says tells someone to leave logic out of an argument, I find that easy to ridicule. Of course I was having fun with it. And I would hope Paul didn't mean logic shouldn't be brought into this argument, because that's ridiculous.
For instance, when Twirl first quoted Paul he left out the rest of Paul's comment which made his own reply redundant. Twirl missed Paul's point, then set up a straw man to knock over, and you called it logic.
I agree with Paul that Kaman probably should be a little higher on that list. But I think Bynum will be a better player then Kaman next year.
And because the list was compiled based on projections, you think logic tells us that Bynum will be getting more minutes, more touches, more points, more rebounds, blocks etc. It might be a reasonable expectation, but I'm not sure how you can make a conclusion now and call it logical as though there are no other alternatives.
Do you mind telling me your perceived definition of logic? I think you are arguing that it's not a fact Bynum will or will not improve. I'm not saying it's a guarantee or fact that Bynum will in FACT do these things. But based on reading that Bynum is a huge part of LA's plan next year, the rapid rate he improved last year, and watching him play, he's an absolute beast with loads of talent.
Right now you have no idea of how Bynum will co-exist with Gasol. And last season he was out for longer than expected with his knee injury, so how can you be so sure that he will play more minutes? That's about as logical as calling another poster's comments "null and void" when others agree with him that the list is flawed
No, I don't, but logic tells me a huge hole in that team in the playoffs last year was a lack of a big man who could defend, rebound and finish around the rim. If you want to argue an extremely small possibility that Andrew Bynums knee somehow gets injured again, that's not very logical. Here is a link about Bynums current health and his knee http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-lak ... ?track=rss .... Now if I read anything different before the season starts, I will change my tune. You can sit there and speculate with what if's all you want. But to sum up my logic for Bynum having a very good season next year
Logical Reason's..
1.) The link I provided up above. Andrew Bynum is now healthy again.
2.) Look at Bynum's pattern of improvement from year 1 to 3. http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/s ... yerId=2748 Every year he's gotten more minutes, more touches, he has improved drastically improved. Therefore what logical indication do we have that he will suddenly take a step back and regress?
3.) Watching Andrew Bynum, how much he has matured at the young age of 20. The power he has, his touch around the rim, his ability to rebound and defend, he will most likely improve. Is it a forgone conclusion he will become even better, of course not. But logic tells me by watching him on the court, watching how much he's improved, knowing he's healthy. I feel Andrew Bynum will be even better next year. If you disagree, I need more then "Well you dont know!" And what if's.
.
gloves = off