ImageImageImage

Rubio Thread Seis (VI)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Feilong
Veteran
Posts: 2,872
And1: 1,029
Joined: Jan 26, 2014

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1641 » by Feilong » Fri Aug 29, 2014 7:40 am

Comparing to Curry's contract is completely wrong.
Curry is a max contract player, above max actually. He signed when he wasn't as good as today and there were serious concerns about his health (ankles).
Ricky is below max player, at the moment.
Ricky will be paid higher than he actually performs because a) he is the face of the franchise b) public magnet c) he makes teammates better.
So how much more will Taylor pay him, it depends. Let's just hope Ricky doesn't walk away because Taylor made one more wrong evaluation.
User avatar
lobishome
Analyst
Posts: 3,695
And1: 632
Joined: Sep 01, 2009
Location: Overseas

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1642 » by lobishome » Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:01 am

I think Ricky is asking the max because he prefers talk about his contract next year. He knows perfectly the Wolves aren't going to give him it.

It's only a opinion :dontknow:
YaleS
Sophomore
Posts: 213
And1: 63
Joined: Aug 22, 2014

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1643 » by YaleS » Fri Aug 29, 2014 10:22 am

lobishome wrote:I think Ricky is asking the max because he prefers talk about his contract next year. He knows perfectly the Wolves aren't going to give him it.

It's only a opinion :dontknow:


Yeah, but I dont see any other team is offering him near the max, so if he doesn`t wanna do "fair" deal earlier, we can just match. Who are we really betting againt in this scenario (I don`t want to prove my point, just to start discussion who are we betting againts):

Bos (Rondo (prob. re-signes), Smart) - doubt it, + we are better team, so doubt it
Nets (Deron, Jack) - nop
Knicks (Jose on 7 mil) - maybe
Phi - no way
Toronto - (Lowry) - no way
Chi - no way if Rose is healthy
Cle - no way
Det - Jennings is at least gonna play 2015/16 , so doubt it
Ind - maybe
MJ team - no way
Dallas - maybe
Denver (Ty)- nop
GSW - .... yeah, no
Hou - no cap
Clips - no
Lal - pretty sure they re-sign Lin, they need famous players
Mem - no
Maimi - maybe
Mil - don`t think they want to do that atm, so doubt it
Pelicans (Jrue) - maybe, dunno
OKC - no
Orl - no
Suns - def. no
Port- def. no
Sacr- yep
Spurs - no
Wash - def no
Utah - nah

So I got Knicks, Ind, Dallas, Miami, Sacr.
I can see Knicks giving huge offer
Ind - think Roy and West opting in, if they do so they stand at 70 mil. Offer from here depends on that i guess
Dallas - i see them offering much, but think they are way worse team
Miami - probably they`ll not have any space
Sacr - They have Gay to re-sign, maybe still can put decent offer.
User avatar
Takingbaconback
Head Coach
Posts: 6,942
And1: 2,582
Joined: Jun 22, 2013
       

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1644 » by Takingbaconback » Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:11 am

Feilong wrote:Comparing to Curry's contract is completely wrong.
Curry is a max contract player, above max actually. He signed when he wasn't as good as today and there were serious concerns about his health (ankles).
Ricky is below max player, at the moment.
Ricky will be paid higher than he actually performs because a) he is the face of the franchise b) public magnet c) he makes teammates better.
So how much more will Taylor pay him, it depends. Let's just hope Ricky doesn't walk away because Taylor made one more wrong evaluation.


Curry signed that contract and regardless of whether he's worth more or not us irrelevant. Players use overpaid contracts all the time to gain leverage, it goes both ways. Rubio should be grateful flip got such great pieces around him and should reward the organization like curry did to ease the cap for better players.

Anyways Rubio is on notice. If he doesnt improve his shot and demands a max contract, flip may let him walk and draft a PG. Frees up the money we thought would prevent wolves from signing a very good PF like millsap especially if thad opt out too. Im sure flip wouldnt lose any sleep with mudiay(tyus)/lavine/wiggins/millsap/pek lineup.
Flip could also slide lavine to pg, wiggins to sg, and draft a SG/SF if a prospect jumps out at him.
Feilong
Veteran
Posts: 2,872
And1: 1,029
Joined: Jan 26, 2014

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1645 » by Feilong » Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:26 am

^
Every sentence you wrote is wrong.
I hope you simply didn't pay attention writing it so please edit your post before i answer it. I don't want to quote every sentence.
User avatar
lobishome
Analyst
Posts: 3,695
And1: 632
Joined: Sep 01, 2009
Location: Overseas

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1646 » by lobishome » Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:57 am

Yep, Lavine is a PG .... as Shved.

YaleS wrote:
Yeah, but I dont see any other team is offering him near the max, so if he doesn`t wanna do "fair" deal earlier, we can just match. Who are we really betting againt in this scenario (I don`t want to prove my point, just to start discussion who are we betting againts):

Bos (Rondo (prob. re-signes), Smart) - doubt it, + we are better team, so doubt it
Nets (Deron, Jack) - nop
Knicks (Jose on 7 mil) - maybe
Phi - no way
Toronto - (Lowry) - no way
Chi - no way if Rose is healthy
Cle - no way
Det - Jennings is at least gonna play 2015/16 , so doubt it
Ind - maybe
MJ team - no way
Dallas - maybe
Denver (Ty)- nop
GSW - .... yeah, no
Hou - no cap
Clips - no
Lal - pretty sure they re-sign Lin, they need famous players
Mem - no
Maimi - maybe
Mil - don`t think they want to do that atm, so doubt it
Pelicans (Jrue) - maybe, dunno
OKC - no
Orl - no
Suns - def. no
Port- def. no
Sacr- yep
Spurs - no
Wash - def no
Utah - nah

So I got Knicks, Ind, Dallas, Miami, Sacr.
I can see Knicks giving huge offer
Ind - think Roy and West opting in, if they do so they stand at 70 mil. Offer from here depends on that i guess
Dallas - i see them offering much, but think they are way worse team
Miami - probably they`ll not have any space
Sacr - They have Gay to re-sign, maybe still can put decent offer.


I'm so disagreed with you that I don't know where to begin.
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1647 » by NewWolvesOrder » Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:41 pm

Takingbaconback wrote:
Feilong wrote:Comparing to Curry's contract is completely wrong.
Curry is a max contract player, above max actually. He signed when he wasn't as good as today and there were serious concerns about his health (ankles).
Ricky is below max player, at the moment.
Ricky will be paid higher than he actually performs because a) he is the face of the franchise b) public magnet c) he makes teammates better.
So how much more will Taylor pay him, it depends. Let's just hope Ricky doesn't walk away because Taylor made one more wrong evaluation.


Curry signed that contract and regardless of whether he's worth more or not us irrelevant. Players use overpaid contracts all the time to gain leverage, it goes both ways. Rubio should be grateful flip got such great pieces around him and should reward the organization like curry did to ease the cap for better players.

Anyways Rubio is on notice. If he doesnt improve his shot and demands a max contract, flip may let him walk and draft a PG. Frees up the money we thought would prevent wolves from signing a very good PF like millsap especially if thad opt out too. Im sure flip wouldnt lose any sleep with mudiay(tyus)/lavine/wiggins/millsap/pek lineup.
Flip could also slide lavine to pg, wiggins to sg, and draft a SG/SF if a prospect jumps out at him.



I think you're are losing the argument here.
Merc_Porto
General Manager
Posts: 9,936
And1: 3,529
Joined: Nov 21, 2013
   

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1648 » by Merc_Porto » Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:51 pm

YaleS wrote:
lobishome wrote:I think Ricky is asking the max because he prefers talk about his contract next year. He knows perfectly the Wolves aren't going to give him it.

It's only a opinion :dontknow:


Yeah, but I dont see any other team is offering him near the max, so if he doesn`t wanna do "fair" deal earlier, we can just match. Who are we really betting againt in this scenario (I don`t want to prove my point, just to start discussion who are we betting againts):

Bos (Rondo (prob. re-signes), Smart) - doubt it, + we are better team, so doubt it
Nets (Deron, Jack) - nop
Knicks (Jose on 7 mil) - maybe
Phi - no way
Toronto - (Lowry) - no way
Chi - no way if Rose is healthy
Cle - no way
Det - Jennings is at least gonna play 2015/16 , so doubt it
Ind - maybe
MJ team - no way
Dallas - maybe
Denver (Ty)- nop
GSW - .... yeah, no
Hou - no cap
Clips - no
Lal - pretty sure they re-sign Lin, they need famous players
Mem - no
Maimi - maybe
Mil - don`t think they want to do that atm, so doubt it
Pelicans (Jrue) - maybe, dunno
OKC - no
Orl - no
Suns - def. no
Port- def. no
Sacr- yep
Spurs - no
Wash - def no
Utah - nah

So I got Knicks, Ind, Dallas, Miami, Sacr.
I can see Knicks giving huge offer
Ind - think Roy and West opting in, if they do so they stand at 70 mil. Offer from here depends on that i guess
Dallas - i see them offering much, but think they are way worse team
Miami - probably they`ll not have any space
Sacr - They have Gay to re-sign, maybe still can put decent offer.


This list is so wrong on so many levels. Wow
User avatar
lobishome
Analyst
Posts: 3,695
And1: 632
Joined: Sep 01, 2009
Location: Overseas

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1649 » by lobishome » Fri Aug 29, 2014 1:59 pm

Takingbaconback wrote:(...)Flip could also slide lavine to pg, wiggins to sg, and draft a SG/SF if a prospect jumps out at him.


OMG :( , this is worse than the Shved discussion : he still isn't proved if he is a good SG and we already want to put him at the PG ... even we must move one or two first picks to another position. Yep, we are the timbertrolls

:crazy:
YaleS
Sophomore
Posts: 213
And1: 63
Joined: Aug 22, 2014

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1650 » by YaleS » Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:53 pm

mercgold3 wrote:
YaleS wrote:
lobishome wrote:I think Ricky is asking the max because he prefers talk about his contract next year. He knows perfectly the Wolves aren't going to give him it.

It's only a opinion :dontknow:


Yeah, but I dont see any other team is offering him near the max, so if he doesn`t wanna do "fair" deal earlier, we can just match. Who are we really betting againt in this scenario (I don`t want to prove my point, just to start discussion who are we betting againts):

Bos (Rondo (prob. re-signes), Smart) - doubt it, + we are better team, so doubt it
Nets (Deron, Jack) - nop
Knicks (Jose on 7 mil) - maybe
Phi - no way
Toronto - (Lowry) - no way
Chi - no way if Rose is healthy
Cle - no way
Det - Jennings is at least gonna play 2015/16 , so doubt it
Ind - maybe
MJ team - no way
Dallas - maybe
Denver (Ty)- nop
GSW - .... yeah, no
Hou - no cap
Clips - no
Lal - pretty sure they re-sign Lin, they need famous players
Mem - no
Maimi - maybe
Mil - don`t think they want to do that atm, so doubt it
Pelicans (Jrue) - maybe, dunno
OKC - no
Orl - no
Suns - def. no
Port- def. no
Sacr- yep
Spurs - no
Wash - def no
Utah - nah

So I got Knicks, Ind, Dallas, Miami, Sacr.
I can see Knicks giving huge offer
Ind - think Roy and West opting in, if they do so they stand at 70 mil. Offer from here depends on that i guess
Dallas - i see them offering much, but think they are way worse team
Miami - probably they`ll not have any space
Sacr - They have Gay to re-sign, maybe still can put decent offer.


This list is so wrong on so many levels. Wow


Care to explain or just ? And who you think is gonna offer rubio max?
User avatar
urinesane
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,012
And1: 2,882
Joined: May 10, 2010
 

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1651 » by urinesane » Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:04 pm

Feilong wrote:Comparing to Curry's contract is completely wrong.
Curry is a max contract player, above max actually. He signed when he wasn't as good as today and there were serious concerns about his health (ankles).
Ricky is below max player, at the moment.
Ricky will be paid higher than he actually performs because a) he is the face of the franchise b) public magnet c) he makes teammates better.
So how much more will Taylor pay him, it depends. Let's just hope Ricky doesn't walk away because Taylor made one more wrong evaluation.


What kind of PPG and FG% would justify a max contract with Rubio (based on production)?
Feilong
Veteran
Posts: 2,872
And1: 1,029
Joined: Jan 26, 2014

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1652 » by Feilong » Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:18 pm

urinesane wrote:What kind of PPG and FG% would justify a max contract with Rubio (based on production)?


Tough question because you have to count in the other factors. Face of franchise, making teammates better, public magnet etc.
If he was a 14ppg/9ast, 44%FG , 38%3P i would easily give him the max. So for me he is not far of.

Btw what do you think about this guy? Looks good?
[instagram]http://instagram.com/p/sSl3mSyBIb/[/instagram]
User avatar
wildvikeswolves
Starter
Posts: 2,025
And1: 577
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
       

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1653 » by wildvikeswolves » Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:12 pm

Feilong wrote:
urinesane wrote:What kind of PPG and FG% would justify a max contract with Rubio (based on production)?


Tough question because you have to count in the other factors. Face of franchise, making teammates better, public magnet etc.
If he was a 14ppg/9ast, 44%FG , 38%3P i would easily give him the max. So for me he is not far of.

Btw what do you think about this guy? Looks good?
[instagram]http://instagram.com/p/sSl3mSyBIb/[/instagram]


Bazzy the beast! I wonder how much hes lost since the summer league
User avatar
Saltine
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,336
And1: 912
Joined: Jul 20, 2003
Location: Land o' Lakes
     

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1654 » by Saltine » Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:50 pm

Ricky Rubio’s Top 10 plays of 2013-14
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGs33p23PaQ
User avatar
mandurugo
Starter
Posts: 2,120
And1: 231
Joined: Aug 14, 2002

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1655 » by mandurugo » Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:53 am

Saltine wrote:Ricky Rubio’s Top 10 plays of 2013-14
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGs33p23PaQ


Awesome. I don't understand fans of the NBA who aren't fans of Rubio.
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,470
And1: 3,678
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1656 » by Basti » Sat Aug 30, 2014 11:08 am

What exactly are the rules when it comes to the deadline to sign an extension coming off a rookie deal? Wasn't it sometime in January/February before the rookie contract expires? That's about the time Love signed his deal, right?

Assuming that's the deadline for Ricky, I think it's enough time to see if he will be capable of assuming his new role. If he can show enough improvement, he should be getting around 11 to 12 million annually. If he still won't show enough improvement I hope it'll be below 10 million annually.
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,470
And1: 3,678
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1657 » by Basti » Sat Aug 30, 2014 11:10 am

octt wrote:[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ywi6wDjJjo[/youtube]
Rubioop
At least we can expect that.
Rubio shot 3/3 on long two,but I can't find highlight.


I can see Ricky and Gorgui doing that every now and then. Not that Gorgui is as mobile and agile as Serge but I think he can still pull that off.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,532
And1: 17,943
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1658 » by Klomp » Sat Aug 30, 2014 11:29 am

Basti wrote:What exactly are the rules when it comes to the deadline to sign an extension coming off a rookie deal? Wasn't it sometime in January/February before the rookie contract expires? That's about the time Love signed his deal, right?

I wish

From the day following the July moratorium to the October 31 preceding the player's last option season


Meaning, we'll be able to see him in two regular season games.

Kevin Love's situation was an outlier because it was the lockout-shortened season.

For 2011-12 the window is open from December 9, 2011 to January 25, 2012
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
octt
Ballboy
Posts: 26
And1: 9
Joined: May 19, 2014

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1659 » by octt » Sat Aug 30, 2014 11:36 am

Basti wrote:What exactly are the rules when it comes to the deadline to sign an extension coming off a rookie deal? Wasn't it sometime in January/February before the rookie contract expires? That's about the time Love signed his deal, right?

Assuming that's the deadline for Ricky, I think it's enough time to see if he will be capable of assuming his new role. If he can show enough improvement, he should be getting around 11 to 12 million annually. If he still won't show enough improvement I hope it'll be below 10 million annually.

The deadline is 10/31.Love singed extention in Jan because of lockout
According to Wolfson's interview,wolf's FO is willing to offerr Rubio like 4y/44M contract.But Rubio's agent "balked" this idea.
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,470
And1: 3,678
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

Re: Rubio Thread Seis (VI) 

Post#1660 » by Basti » Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:07 pm

Ah, that makes sense. Thanks for the information.

What a bummer, though.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves