2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,546
- And1: 17,964
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
[tweet]https://twitter.com/draftexpress/status/340679985100627968[/tweet]
I bet KCP is a major riser.
I bet KCP is a major riser.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,919
- And1: 5,943
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
so at what point in the draft do you have to take Shabazz? we could probably get him in the teens at this point. You could take Caldwell Pope @ 9 and trade Williams to get Muhammed too - could be a good gamble w/ minimal investment.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,919
- And1: 5,943
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
I like Erik Murphy in the 2nd - being compared to Bonner and would be a nice pick n pop option w/ Rubio
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
- [RCG]
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,047
- And1: 135
- Joined: May 24, 2010
- Location: Saint Paul
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
Sounds like Zeller continues to impress with his athleticism and shooting. He'll likely be a top-8 pick.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,919
- And1: 5,943
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
[RCG] wrote:Sounds like Zeller continues to impress with his athleticism and shooting. He'll likely be a top-8 pick.
I sure hope so, that'd help us a lot
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
- NikolaPekovic
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,117
- And1: 344
- Joined: Jun 27, 2012
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
In those flip interviews he keeps emphasizing size in the backcourt. Unless McCollum looks like the next stephen curry in workouts then i dont see us pick him. Shabazz might be higher on our big board than he is.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,455
- And1: 2,013
- Joined: May 20, 2009
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
Size in the backcourt will definitely help us out a lot. Ricky is big, but lacks strength so we can't be sending out Ridnour at SG again.
I've said this over and over...but I hope we could get Travis Releford with one of our 2nds. Idk why he isn't rated higher, great defender, he can handle a bit, good shooter and he played for a big time program. I'd also be interested in Reggie Bullock.
I've said this over and over...but I hope we could get Travis Releford with one of our 2nds. Idk why he isn't rated higher, great defender, he can handle a bit, good shooter and he played for a big time program. I'd also be interested in Reggie Bullock.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
- [RCG]
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,047
- And1: 135
- Joined: May 24, 2010
- Location: Saint Paul
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
moss_is_1 wrote:Size in the backcourt will definitely help us out a lot. Ricky is big, but lacks strength so we can't be sending out Ridnour at SG again.
I've said this over and over...but I hope we could get Travis Releford with one of our 2nds. Idk why he isn't rated higher, great defender, he can handle a bit, good shooter and he played for a big time program. I'd also be interested in Reggie Bullock.
Well he might be flying under the radar on purpose, GMs don't want to tip their hand. But he would be a solid 2nd round option.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,550
- And1: 3,716
- Joined: Nov 22, 2012
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
As I mentioned before, I hope Flip considers Bogdan Bogdanovic in the 2nd round, he's a 6'6.35'' and 6'11'' wingspan(??!!), playing at SG. He's from the same club where Pek got known playing for, Partizan Belgrade.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,724
- And1: 1,428
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Blazer fan from Toronto
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
theGreatRC wrote:Im not understanding the KCP love. Can someone help me see the light?
I think he is similar to Terrence Ross, three pointer gunner, streaky, with athleticism, can't create, and has a tough time getting to the basket due to bad ball handling skills, his defense first year should be on par wit any rookie. I would be wary making him a starter though, but his second year he could be.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,919
- And1: 5,943
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
FinnTheHuman wrote:As I mentioned before, I hope Flip considers Bogdan Bogdanovic in the 2nd round, he's a 6'6.35'' and 6'11'' wingspan(??!!), playing at SG. He's from the same club where Pek got known playing for, Partizan Belgrade.
sounds good - we don't have the roster spots anyways... I'm assuming he's under the typical european 19 year 2 million dollar contract that he signed when he was 16 with a few random NBA opt outs so we can stash him?
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,550
- And1: 3,716
- Joined: Nov 22, 2012
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
Devilzsidewalk wrote:sounds good - we don't have the roster spots anyways... I'm assuming he's under the typical european 19 year 2 million dollar contract that he signed when he was 16 with a few random NBA opt outs so we can stash him?
He signed a multi-year contract in 2010, but any other details are not known. I think he definitely has a typical contract with few NBA opt outs, imo he wouldn't enter the draft if he didn't.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,546
- And1: 17,964
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
DX has posted its new mock, and had this teaser tweet yesterday.
[Twitter]https://twitter.com/DraftExpress/status/340679985100627968[/Twitter]
Most expected KCP to be one of those changes, but he hasn't moved from 19
http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-mock-draft/2013/
[Twitter]https://twitter.com/DraftExpress/status/340679985100627968[/Twitter]
Most expected KCP to be one of those changes, but he hasn't moved from 19
http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-mock-draft/2013/
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,546
- And1: 17,964
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
DX has posted its new mock, and had this teaser tweet yesterday.
[tweet]http://twitter.com/DraftExpress/status/340679985100627968[/tweet]
Most expected KCP to be one of those changes, but he hasn't moved from 19
http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-mock-draft/2013/
[tweet]http://twitter.com/DraftExpress/status/340679985100627968[/tweet]
Most expected KCP to be one of those changes, but he hasn't moved from 19
http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-mock-draft/2013/
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
It would be sweet if there were explanations. I'd be interested to read why they have the Wolves making a terrible pick at #9.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,546
- And1: 17,964
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
Here are some of the bigger changes I noticed (sorry for long delay between posts, someone stopped by to chat):
-Len jumped from 6 to 4. Bennett dropped from 4 to 6.
-Adams jumped from 16 to 10. Gobert dropped from 10 to 16.
-Karasev dropped from 15 to 26.
-Snell jumped from 35 to 30.
-Pierre Jackson jumped from 42 to 32.
-Glen Rice dropped from 26 to 34.
-Goodwin dropped from 30 to 39.
-Erik Murphy jumped from 54 to 43.
-Len jumped from 6 to 4. Bennett dropped from 4 to 6.
-Adams jumped from 16 to 10. Gobert dropped from 10 to 16.
-Karasev dropped from 15 to 26.
-Snell jumped from 35 to 30.
-Pierre Jackson jumped from 42 to 32.
-Glen Rice dropped from 26 to 34.
-Goodwin dropped from 30 to 39.
-Erik Murphy jumped from 54 to 43.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
- big3_8_19_21
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,113
- And1: 421
- Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
Crabbe, Bullock and Hardaway Jr. all went up a few spots as well.
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
- NikolaPekovic
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,117
- And1: 344
- Joined: Jun 27, 2012
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
I doubt kcp drops that far and that bennet gets drafted by the pelicans.
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,919
- And1: 5,943
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
that'd be weird to see the Pelicans take Bennett
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,546
- And1: 17,964
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: 2013 Draft Targets (#9, #26, #52, #59)
Devilzsidewalk wrote:that'd be weird to see the Pelicans take Bennett
Kinda like how it'd be weird for us to take Williams when we have Love
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves