yardbarker

Tyreke Evans

Moderators: Basti, Klomp, revprodeji

ImageImageImage

Tyreke Evans

Postby Beezer on Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:33 am

I don't know if there was a post about this already. I haven't seen one in the few days that I've been on here. But if the Kings opt out of Tyreke Evans' contract after this season, which is a possibility since there's a team option, would you be willing to go after him?

Personally, even though he has struggled a bit lately, I think he has a good skill set. He doesn't have the best shot, but he can still find ways to score. I am a fan, and would like to see the Wolves go after him.
User avatar
Beezer
Ballboy
 
Posts: 43
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 7, 2012

Re: Tyreke Evans

Postby [RCG] on Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:48 am

I think it is unlikely but possible.
On the Wolves trading Kirilenko, Williams & Ridnour for Pau Gasol:
Cashin out wrote:I can't wait till Kupchak pulls off this trade with Minnesota,I will bring this thread back when Kuptchak rips Kaughn for all his assets.
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
 
Posts: 6232
And1: 44
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Tyreke Evans

Postby jade_hippo on Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:50 am

we need a shooter, and a shooter he is not. so yeah, unlikely but possible.
User avatar
jade_hippo
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1924
And1: 7
Joined: Jan 4, 2009
Location: Take off... eh!

Re: Tyreke Evans

Postby Klomp on Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:02 am

Won't have cap space. Whatever money we have will go to Pekovic and Budinger.
Image
DusterBuster wrote:Klomp is like the ultimate troll mod.
User avatar
Klomp
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 29005
And1: 176
Joined: Jul 8, 2005

Re: Tyreke Evans

Postby sisibilio on Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:09 am

And it's very unlikely that the Kings just let him go, they'd probably ask for a lottery pick at least.
If you want to try to measure the elements of basketball that are supposedly unmeasurable, spend a game just watching Marc Gasol.
@MikePradaSBN
sisibilio
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 3842
And1: 31
Joined: Nov 17, 2009

Re: Tyreke Evans

Postby southern wolf on Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:33 am

Klomp wrote:Won't have cap space. Whatever money we have will go to Pekovic and Budinger.


This.

I liked Evans in his rookie year. I thought he was going to be the next big thing after his 20/5/5 rookie season.
User avatar
southern wolf
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4823
And1: 48
Joined: Aug 2, 2008
Location: Australia

Re: Tyreke Evans

Postby Foye on Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:17 am

I'm pretty sure we are done with acquiring headcases knowing how Michael Beasley turned out.
User avatar
Foye
RealGM
 
Posts: 12885
And1: 41
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt

Re: Tyreke Evans

Postby the_bruce on Tue Dec 11, 2012 8:59 am

I like tyreke he's got a handle and can get to the rack. He's a bit out of control at times and I've always felt the problem is he's clearly a natural slashing 2 and he's mostly played pg and sf in sac. I wouldn't go after him in FA, but if he replaced one or both of ridnour or JJ I wouldn't care if the wolves traded for him. I can't think of a fair trade for him that I'd be willing to do.
the_bruce
Analyst
 
Posts: 3254
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 1, 2007

Re: Tyreke Evans

Postby tranjSAIC on Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:49 am

Worst mistake going after a guy like this for your team, would you rather have the ball in Rubio's hands or Evans? Evans NEEDs the ball to be effective, I don't think him and Rubio would mesh well. A Klay thompson type catch and shoot guy would be perfect with Rubio.
[quote:e2992abb8f="Low-Ki"]I just don't understand how Orlando fans can even think they are obviously better then the Raps or Charlotte.[/quote]
tranjSAIC
Veteran
 
Posts: 2562
And1: 8
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Location: orlando

Re: Tyreke Evans

Postby cpfsf on Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:02 pm

I've considered it in the past. Someone will overpay him though.
Image
mugzi wrote:it would actually lower my 156 iq to quote any number of the inane posts Ive seen
User avatar
cpfsf
Head Coach
 
Posts: 7107
And1: 63
Joined: Apr 9, 2008
Location: your mom

Re: Tyreke Evans

Postby SO_MONEY on Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:34 pm

Klomp wrote:Won't have cap space. Whatever money we have will go to Pekovic and Budinger.


Wrong, we will have space, cap holds will also be lower than what we will pay guys in the end, there will be some flexibility, not much, not necessarily T. Evens much, but if we are willing to go over the LUX for a year it is possible.

I wouldn't do it, as there are better options out there, but I honestly think a type of deal like this could happen (a player due an extension), or taking on a player who makes 10-13mil.
User avatar
SO_MONEY
Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1361
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 11, 2009

Re: Tyreke Evans

Postby Klomp on Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:39 pm

SO_MONEY wrote:
Klomp wrote:Won't have cap space. Whatever money we have will go to Pekovic and Budinger.


Wrong, we will have space, cap holds will also be lower than what we will pay guys in the end, there will be some flexibility, not much, not necessarily T. Evens much, but if we are willing to go over the LUX for a year it is possible.

With cap holds, we are currently at $69m for the offseason (Note: that includes Roy's salary)

Cap Holds
Pekovic - $9,190,680
Budinger - $1,681,728
Howard - $884,293
Amundson - $884,293
Image
DusterBuster wrote:Klomp is like the ultimate troll mod.
User avatar
Klomp
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 29005
And1: 176
Joined: Jul 8, 2005

Re: Tyreke Evans

Postby SO_MONEY on Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:25 pm

Klomp wrote:
SO_MONEY wrote:
Klomp wrote:Won't have cap space. Whatever money we have will go to Pekovic and Budinger.


Wrong, we will have space, cap holds will also be lower than what we will pay guys in the end, there will be some flexibility, not much, not necessarily T. Evens much, but if we are willing to go over the LUX for a year it is possible.

With cap holds, we are currently at $69m for the offseason (Note: that includes Roy's salary)

Cap Holds
Pekovic - $9,190,680
Budinger - $1,681,728
Howard - $884,293
Amundson - $884,293



Amundson and Howard don't really count as we only need 12 players, Roy will be gone. We are right around 60-62mil, right up against the cap, we would/could then have room for a minimum player or two and a MLE.

Perhaps that is more clear? A MLE is not enough in all likelihood for Evens.

EDIT: We are at about 64mil, forgot Shved.

So, we may only have the MLE. My bad.
User avatar
SO_MONEY
Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1361
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 11, 2009

Re: Tyreke Evans

Postby Klomp on Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:38 pm

SO_MONEY wrote:Amundson and Howard don't really count as we only need 12 players, Roy will be gone. We are right around 60-62mil, right up against the cap, we would/could then have room for a minimum player or two and a MLE.

Perhaps that is more clear? A MLE is not enough in all likelihood for Evens.

EDIT: We are at about 64mil, forgot Shved.

So, we may only have the MLE. My bad.

Isn't the cap 58m?
Image
DusterBuster wrote:Klomp is like the ultimate troll mod.
User avatar
Klomp
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 29005
And1: 176
Joined: Jul 8, 2005

Re: Tyreke Evans

Postby SO_MONEY on Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:46 pm

Klomp wrote:
SO_MONEY wrote:Amundson and Howard don't really count as we only need 12 players, Roy will be gone. We are right around 60-62mil, right up against the cap, we would/could then have room for a minimum player or two and a MLE.

Perhaps that is more clear? A MLE is not enough in all likelihood for Evens.

EDIT: We are at about 64mil, forgot Shved.

So, we may only have the MLE. My bad.

Isn't the cap 58m?



For one reason or another I thought it was 62mil, but 58mil might be right, I'll have to look I guess...forget things like that if you don't use them everyday.

EDIT:

I guess I am just having a bad day, month, year it is $58.044 million, has been since last year...
User avatar
SO_MONEY
Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1361
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 11, 2009

Next

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users