ImageImageImage

Nikola Pekovic

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,748
And1: 18,194
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#46 » by Klomp » Tue Jan 22, 2013 5:42 am

[RCG] wrote:Overall deal. I'm thinking 4/48-ish. The vibe I get is that Pekovic is happy here and will take a deal if he thinks it is fair.

Something to keep in mind: Pekovic shares the same agent as Al Jefferson, who reportedly took less when he signed his Minnesota extension for 4/50.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#47 » by [RCG] » Tue Jan 22, 2013 5:49 am

Klomp wrote:
[RCG] wrote:Pekovic can't re-sign with the Wolves for some odd reason I forget.


We just can't sign him to an extension before July 1, which is when ANY team can offer him a contract.


But what was the reason we couldn't renegotiate before?

Klomp wrote:
[RCG] wrote:Overall deal. I'm thinking 4/48-ish. The vibe I get is that Pekovic is happy here and will take a deal if he thinks it is fair.

Something to keep in mind: Pekovic shares the same agent as Al Jefferson, who reportedly took less when he signed his Minnesota extension for 4/50.


I think that bodes well, no?
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,748
And1: 18,194
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#48 » by Klomp » Tue Jan 22, 2013 5:53 am

[RCG] wrote:But what was the reason we couldn't renegotiate before?


Something to do with the fact that it was a three-year deal (so we may be in similar situation with Shved down the road)

[RCG] wrote:I think that bodes well, no?


I think it does.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 48,620
And1: 14,664
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#49 » by Calinks » Tue Jan 22, 2013 7:29 am

Hate to say it but I don't think I am willing to pay Pek a lot of money. He is a beast but I'm really starting to think he is injury prone. If we can only get him for 65 games a year and for ten of them he is battling some injury, I don't know how much money I am willing to give him. Durability is huge.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,748
And1: 18,194
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#50 » by Klomp » Tue Jan 22, 2013 8:07 am

Calinks wrote:Hate to say it but I don't think I am willing to pay Pek a lot of money. He is a beast but I'm really starting to think he is injury prone. If we can only get him for 65 games a year and for ten of them he is battling some injury, I don't know how much money I am willing to give him. Durability is huge.

Honestly, I wonder if he plays too much. I think he'd be best in a 20 mpg role off the bench. His physical style seems to do him more harm than good.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
FinnTheHuman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,550
And1: 3,716
Joined: Nov 22, 2012
   

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#51 » by FinnTheHuman » Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:06 pm

Klomp wrote:
Calinks wrote:Hate to say it but I don't think I am willing to pay Pek a lot of money. He is a beast but I'm really starting to think he is injury prone. If we can only get him for 65 games a year and for ten of them he is battling some injury, I don't know how much money I am willing to give him. Durability is huge.

Honestly, I wonder if he plays too much. I think he'd be best in a 20 mpg role off the bench. His physical style seems to do him more harm than good.


Wow, that's a huge understatement, considering he's proven himself as our best offensive option this season, and being decent on D. His physical style is just fine, it's just not so great for his health when he has to put in so much extra effort because of the injuries and general lack of offensive options.

And, it's not like all of his injuries were because of his too big effort, there was that one with stepping on Carter's foot.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 55,511
And1: 15,052
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#52 » by shrink » Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:40 pm

I believe we couldn't give him an extension a year before because we got he was not a first round pick - we signed him to a straight three-year deal, and the new CBA addressed the issue of him even becoming an RFA.

The reason you may expect a max offer is for the reasons listed, but also because the NBA is changing. As the true superstars gather in fewer cities, the remaining teams are left with more cap space, new team salary minimums, and no true superstars to spend it on. Last year we saw a max deal to Roy Hibbert, and we're very aware that we offered Nic Batum more than he was worth, and it was still matched.
cupcakesnake wrote:I know a lot of people haven't seen him play, but no one is forcing you to make up an opinion and post it.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,787
And1: 1,021
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#53 » by Dewey » Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:57 pm

shrink wrote:I believe we couldn't give him an extension a year before because we got he was not a first round pick - we signed him to a straight three-year deal, and the new CBA addressed the issue of him even becoming an RFA.

The reason you may expect a max offer is for the reasons listed, but also because the NBA is changing. As the true superstars gather in fewer cities, the remaining teams are left with more cap space, new team salary minimums, and no true superstars to spend it on. Last year we saw a max deal to Roy Hibbert, and we're very aware that we offered Nic Batum more than he was worth, and it was still matched.


no doubt he will be overpaid and I can live with that - as long as all other opportunities have been givin the proper attention.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,811
And1: 8,832
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#54 » by C.lupus » Tue Jan 22, 2013 3:16 pm

FinnTheHuman wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Calinks wrote:Hate to say it but I don't think I am willing to pay Pek a lot of money. He is a beast but I'm really starting to think he is injury prone. If we can only get him for 65 games a year and for ten of them he is battling some injury, I don't know how much money I am willing to give him. Durability is huge.

Honestly, I wonder if he plays too much. I think he'd be best in a 20 mpg role off the bench. His physical style seems to do him more harm than good.


Wow, that's a huge understatement, considering he's proven himself as our best offensive option this season, and being decent on D. His physical style is just fine, it's just not so great for his health when he has to put in so much extra effort because of the injuries and general lack of offensive options.

And, it's not like all of his injuries were because of his too big effort, there was that one with stepping on Carter's foot.

I think he is always going to be prone to nagging injuries like ankle sprains and such just because he carries so much weight and bangs for a living. He's played in 78% of the teams games in his career here to date. It's probably safe to pencil him in for missing 10-15 games per season. Should that reduce his value? Yes. Will it? Probably not. Big men always get overpaid in the NBA.

It would be nice to have a competent backup that could fill in 20 mpg to reduce the workload and provide a little insurance.
ACST
Ballboy
Posts: 5
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 23, 2012

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#55 » by ACST » Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:51 am

I think pek is better here than he would be anywhere else. He is a fan favorite, and I'm sure he likes that. If he went somewhere else, I don't think he would get the same fan love he gets here and his play would suffer. I hope he stays.
Murphs56
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,696
And1: 1,247
Joined: Nov 13, 2012
       

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#56 » by Murphs56 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:43 am

Money talks people. He's going to sign that offer sheet where he gets paid the most like every other player does
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,748
And1: 18,194
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#57 » by Klomp » Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:13 am

Murphs56 wrote:Money talks people. He's going to sign that offer sheet where he gets paid the most like every other player does

There are factors other than money. Money isn't the most important thing in everybody's life.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Murphs56
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,696
And1: 1,247
Joined: Nov 13, 2012
       

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#58 » by Murphs56 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:35 am

Klomp wrote:
Murphs56 wrote:Money talks people. He's going to sign that offer sheet where he gets paid the most like every other player does

There are factors other than money. Money isn't the most important thing in everybody's life.


Sure. Well if the Wolves act quick and give him something comparable to the open market, he might sign. But if his agent tells him to wait to see what's out there, then he'll wait. Even if he wants to come back, his agent will make sure he finds out what he's worth on the open market. And if that takes signing an offer sheet to make the Wolves act, well then that is what's going to happen
User avatar
southern wolf
General Manager
Posts: 9,854
And1: 2,163
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Australia
   

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#59 » by southern wolf » Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:19 am

Murphs56 wrote:Money talks people. He's going to sign that offer sheet where he gets paid the most like every other player does


I don't know, I think Pek likes it in Minny. I could definitely see him staying for less there, like I've said before. It's ice cold and he's surrounded by Europeans, it's the closest lifestyle to home he could possibly get in America!
User avatar
LedeniZZZ
Senior
Posts: 586
And1: 172
Joined: Aug 30, 2012

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#60 » by LedeniZZZ » Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:27 pm

If it's close and Minny offer less... he is going to stay in Min. But if it's bigger diffrence in salary then he is going to take better offer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JKfZA-kMjo
call for unattainable beauty
FinnTheHuman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,550
And1: 3,716
Joined: Nov 22, 2012
   

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#61 » by FinnTheHuman » Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:35 pm

LedeniZZZ wrote:If it's close and Minny offer less... he is going to stay in Min. But if it's bigger diffrence in salary then he is going to take better offer.


He's a RFA, Minny will have to match every offer he gets, so it's not about Pek deciding, it's all on our management.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,748
And1: 18,194
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#62 » by Klomp » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:47 pm

FinnTheHuman wrote:
LedeniZZZ wrote:If it's close and Minny offer less... he is going to stay in Min. But if it's bigger diffrence in salary then he is going to take better offer.


He's a RFA, Minny will have to match every offer he gets, so it's not about Pek deciding, it's all on our management.

Right, but Minnesota will likely offer a deal of their own. So don't think that Pek won't have any decision to make.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
sisibilio
Head Coach
Posts: 6,873
And1: 1,086
Joined: Nov 18, 2009

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#63 » by sisibilio » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:50 pm

FinnTheHuman wrote:He's a RFA, Minny will have to match every offer he gets, so it's not about Pek deciding

Yes it is. Being a RFA doesn't mean the player is forced to accept the highest bidder.
If you want to try to measure the elements of basketball that are supposedly unmeasurable, spend a game just watching Marc Gasol.
@MikePradaSBN

Wembanyama was created to end all LeBron vs Jordan debates
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#64 » by [RCG] » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:54 pm

sisibilio wrote:
FinnTheHuman wrote:He's a RFA, Minny will have to match every offer he gets, so it's not about Pek deciding

Yes it is. Being a RFA doesn't mean the player is forced to accept the highest bidder.


Being a UFA doesn't mean the player is forced to accept the highest bidder either.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
User avatar
LedeniZZZ
Senior
Posts: 586
And1: 172
Joined: Aug 30, 2012

Re: Nikola Pekovic 

Post#65 » by LedeniZZZ » Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:17 pm

FinnTheHuman wrote:
LedeniZZZ wrote:If it's close and Minny offer less... he is going to stay in Min. But if it's bigger diffrence in salary then he is going to take better offer.


He's a RFA, Minny will have to match every offer he gets, so it's not about Pek deciding, it's all on our management.


It's under assumtion that Min management will make an offer to him which is less that max contract (and they will not offer more than that) and that he get an offer from another team witch is bigger than that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JKfZA-kMjo
call for unattainable beauty

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves