Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,768
- And1: 403
- Joined: Jan 11, 2012
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
Three words: ping pong balls.
Good game boys---arrrooooo!
Good game boys---arrrooooo!
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
- Mattya
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,605
- And1: 6,314
- Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
Free Throws and rebounding. I can live with that shot from Zach. He was on fire and has hit those shots in the clutch before.
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,533
- And1: 17,948
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
Reddy83 wrote:I'd like a good C that can run the floor, play good D and rebound.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 48,478
- And1: 14,350
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
I certainly feel like our biggest hole is shooting. I'd address that first. The rebounding and such can be improved to a degree internally. It will cost us some games but not nearly as much as our inability to space the floor and hit threes. If we had reliable shooting we could be flirting with the 8th seed right now.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
- southern wolf
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,854
- And1: 2,163
- Joined: Aug 02, 2008
- Location: Australia
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
Where's this been all season, Lavine?!
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,943
- And1: 1,262
- Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
Reddy83 wrote:I'd like a good C that can run the floor, play good D and rebound. A lot of our defense issues are experience based (team defense), size/strength (youth) and unity (coaching)...some will improve over time, but getting a big that does those things would make us a playoff team next year.
What? Towns does those things already. Weird priority.
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,533
- And1: 17,948
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
Calinks wrote:I certainly feel like our biggest hole is shooting. I'd address that first. The rebounding and such can be improved to a degree internally.
I'm actually thinking the other way around.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
- m2002brian
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,983
- And1: 1,115
- Joined: May 29, 2009
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
NewWolvesOrder wrote:10 missed free throws came back to bite us in the ass.
BLUEGREENRED
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
- southern wolf
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,854
- And1: 2,163
- Joined: Aug 02, 2008
- Location: Australia
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
My biggest gripe with Mitch right now is his stubborn determination to start Prince all season long. For the love of god just start Lavine or Shabazz already.
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,533
- And1: 17,948
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
southern wolf wrote:My biggest gripe with Mitch right now is his stubborn determination to start Prince all season long. For the love of god just start Lavine or Shabazz already.
I understand his reasoning, but I'm starting to think it's time for a switch as well. Personally, I'd start Muhammad.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,936
- And1: 3,529
- Joined: Nov 21, 2013
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
Well, was a close game against a team on a back-to-back.
That last night won in OT against the powerful team called the Knicks without the role player Carmelo, but with the veteran player Porzingis and the superstar Derrick Williams.
That last night won in OT against the powerful team called the Knicks without the role player Carmelo, but with the veteran player Porzingis and the superstar Derrick Williams.
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,533
- And1: 17,948
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
mercgold3 wrote:Well, was a close game against a team on a back-to-back.
That last night won in OT against the powerful team called the Knicks without the role player Carmelo, but with the veteran player Porzingis and the superstar Derrick Williams.
Solid attempt. 7/10.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
- Mattya
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,605
- And1: 6,314
- Joined: Aug 08, 2008
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
I wonder if people seeing the growth from the young players? Or are they going to keep saying that there hasn't been any development.
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,350
- And1: 1,530
- Joined: Feb 25, 2014
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
I'll bet my first born that Zach starts soon that with that Sam Mitchell favoritism.
frankenwolf wrote:I hope you eat every one of these words next year when the Timberwolves are world champions
[*]-Mar 2023 in reference to the Gobert trade.
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,350
- And1: 1,530
- Joined: Feb 25, 2014
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
Klomp wrote:mercgold3 wrote:Well, was a close game against a team on a back-to-back.
That last night won in OT against the powerful team called the Knicks without the role player Carmelo, but with the veteran player Porzingis and the superstar Derrick Williams.
Solid attempt. 7/10.
5/7*
frankenwolf wrote:I hope you eat every one of these words next year when the Timberwolves are world champions
[*]-Mar 2023 in reference to the Gobert trade.
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,570
- And1: 6,397
- Joined: Nov 24, 2003
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
Klomp wrote:southern wolf wrote:My biggest gripe with Mitch right now is his stubborn determination to start Prince all season long. For the love of god just start Lavine or Shabazz already.
I understand his reasoning, but I'm starting to think it's time for a switch as well. Personally, I'd start Muhammad.
I agree. Prince is a good team defender, but he doesnt rebound at all. And with wiggs not rebounding at a good rate, kat needs help.
Kat and wiggs have been great moving the ball this past month, i think giving them an outlet is a good idea. Bazzy doesnt need to dominate the ball, he is active and knows where to spot up. He isnt an average defender, but hid rebounding should help team defense.
Lavine as great as he shot tonight is just more comfortable getting his own points. Instead of trying to change zach, id just let him be himself; a comboguard gunner.
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,533
- And1: 17,948
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
Note30 wrote:I'll bet my first born that Zach starts soon that with that Sam Mitchell favoritism.
Over Rubio? Don't see it.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: RE: Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,936
- And1: 3,529
- Joined: Nov 21, 2013
Re: RE: Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
Mattya wrote:I wonder if people seeing the growth from the young players? Or are they going to keep saying that there hasn't been any development.
Like who ? Lavine ?
You have your chance tonight.
(But don't talk about the last 10 games of Lavine. Shhhhhhhhh)
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,768
- And1: 403
- Joined: Jan 11, 2012
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Reddy83 wrote:I'd like a good C that can run the floor, play good D and rebound. A lot of our defense issues are experience based (team defense), size/strength (youth) and unity (coaching)...some will improve over time, but getting a big that does those things would make us a playoff team next year.
What? Towns does those things already. Weird priority.
I understand that point, and agree that Towns does those things, but would I see him as a 4. He shouldn't have to grind games at C.
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,768
- And1: 403
- Joined: Jan 11, 2012
Re: Thunder vs Wolves (1/27)
Klomp wrote:Reddy83 wrote:I'd like a good C that can run the floor, play good D and rebound.
Do you want Towns at center?
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves