ImageImageImage

MIN/DAL

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

BG3eb
Sophomore
Posts: 117
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2008

MIN/DAL 

Post#1 » by BG3eb » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:29 pm

Would there be a lot of interest in the contract of Stackhouse, It provide immediate salary relief.

Two options:
Stack and Shawne Williams (09 roughly 2.5 million and a QO of 3.4 or so for the following year) for Miller

Or...
Stack, Carroll and Williams for Miller and Cardinal?
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: MIN/DAL 

Post#2 » by Esohny » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:40 pm

Cardinal and Miller are both expirings. And Miller can play.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
BG3eb
Sophomore
Posts: 117
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2008

Re: MIN/DAL 

Post#3 » by BG3eb » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:42 pm

Yeah, but I didn't know if you'd need roster space based on the fact you've got 3 first rounders and I didn't know the exact layout of the lineup for if you have space for all of them.
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: MIN/DAL 

Post#4 » by john2jer » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:52 pm

No thanks on Matt Carroll.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 31,919
And1: 5,943
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: MIN/DAL 

Post#5 » by Devilzsidewalk » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:53 pm

BG3eb wrote:Yeah, but I didn't know if you'd need roster space based on the fact you've got 3 first rounders and I didn't know the exact layout of the lineup for if you have space for all of them.


I don't get it, you're giving us more players than you're taking back
Image
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,324
And1: 24,145
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: MIN/DAL 

Post#6 » by GopherIt! » Wed Jun 17, 2009 6:42 pm

how about Madsen for the #21 (#22?)? if you ever win it all you need someone who can dance at the parade. I think he can two step.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 55,281
And1: 14,684
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN/DAL 

Post#7 » by shrink » Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:17 pm

BG3eb wrote:Would there be a lot of interest in the contract of Stackhouse, It provide immediate salary relief.

Two options:
Stack and Shawne Williams (09 roughly 2.5 million and a QO of 3.4 or so for the following year) for Miller

Or...
Stack, Carroll and Williams for Miller and Cardinal?


I'm a big fan of this trade. It wouldn't be bad for us to get the expiring (and be able to beat the MLE in a 2009 free agent signing, but more likely dealing Stackhouse to a third team for non-productive expirings and a pick or young talent. MIL and WAS are two places that could use Stackhouse even more than us.

No interest in Carroll. His contract isn't excessive, but he'd cost us 2010 space under our cap.
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

Re: MIN/DAL 

Post#8 » by 4ho5ive » Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:19 pm

He speaks!
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 24,831
And1: 3,458
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: MIN/DAL 

Post#9 » by Foye » Wed Jun 17, 2009 8:10 pm

I would guess we can get better offers for Miller which include at least a pick or a young talent so I'll have to say no to this one.
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: MIN/DAL 

Post#10 » by skorff26 » Wed Jun 17, 2009 8:48 pm

The Stack trade wouldn't be bad since Stackhouse has a ton of value because of his partially guaranteed contract... But a definite NO to Carroll unless we get some major compensation.
BG3eb
Sophomore
Posts: 117
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2008

Re: MIN/DAL 

Post#11 » by BG3eb » Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:35 pm

You'd basically be able to cut stack right away and get savings. Williams can be cut at a cheap price too...so it can free up roster space.
younggunsmn
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,288
And1: 1,388
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: MIN/DAL 

Post#12 » by younggunsmn » Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:09 am

we can do much better than this for miller. stack is only valuable until july 30 when he needs to be cut to realize the cap savings. I only see this working if we get something outstanding for stackhouse from a 3rd team.
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: MIN/DAL 

Post#13 » by skorff26 » Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:50 am

We could immediately move Stack somewhere else (I believe you can trade a player by themselves even if they were recently acquired). And we could get a high pick or something in a deal for stack (stack for elson, Ridnour, #10) or something like that. So then we are getting a high pick for miller.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 55,281
And1: 14,684
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN/DAL 

Post#14 » by shrink » Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:26 am

skorff26 wrote:We could immediately move Stack somewhere else (I believe you can trade a player by themselves even if they were recently acquired). And we could get a high pick or something in a deal for stack (stack for elson, Ridnour, #10) or something like that. So then we are getting a high pick for miller.


That's the way I see it too.

Mike Miller is more valuable on DAL than Stackhouse
Stackhouse is more valuable on (say) MIL than other cap space and a pick
Other cap space and a pick is more valuable on MIN than Mike Miller

Everybody gets what they need.
BG3eb
Sophomore
Posts: 117
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2008

Re: MIN/DAL 

Post#15 » by BG3eb » Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:35 am

just to clarify, I believe August 9th is the dead day for Stack's deal.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves