kamaze wrote:enetric wrote:Paradise wrote:That has not nothing to do with his own actions. What he did was a disgrace to the league.
He wanted the Nets job. He knew what he was getting himself into.
You know several things occurred to me after this game. While I still feel disrespected at how he can so easily disregard his connection to the Nets brand...it's fans his accomplishments here and what that era meant to us, I just don't know what to objectively make of his departure.
First off we have rumors and not much more to go on with regard to his departure. I wish he would have been candid about his side of the story. The part that sucks most is to see that running the worst team in the league in one of its smallest markets with the least upside for the foreseeable future was more appealing than being with our team. All that history the big market and the big pile of cash behind the scenes was not enough. So what was so bad Milwaukee was more appealing?
As easy as it is to dump on him he had this team over achieving last season after Lopez went down. And he has the Bucks winning games. A roster worse that Philly and he is playing .500 ball bearing both NY teams back to back on the road??? Results wise his coaching career has to be considered successful so far.
I don't know if I will ever get over his disregard for his place in our history but I think this current chapter is lacking information. I hope at some point we get to hear both sides of the story.
There's been a disconnect between GM and the coaches they've had Kidd asking for more power would have brought more stability to the front office since he was supposedly to be the coach. The moves Billy King made and continues to make would have got him fired by now. Look at the roster last year compared to this.
It's also become clear the front office doesn't understand how things are run in the NBA. This team is a mess.
Sorry but no. Just because the Bucks look competitive doesn't mean Kidd is a GM or a President. We would be destroying management if Kidd took over and made horrible moves or made questionable decisions. Last time I checked, Kidd randomly benched Kirilenko in the first round. His media response after beat writers asked him about it was ignorant. So, his way of handling Kirilenko wasn't any better. Andrei's wife went off on him via Instagram which was the only reason why he played him throughout round 2.
The reality is Kidd made a demand that was out of his jurisdiction after a medicre start and his point of view was making trades while the fact hearing King tell him "no" probably was the tipping point. Plus, King never wanted to hire him. It was all Prokhrov.
The problem with management is they felt they could get by without draft picks as a Plan B in case of mediority or injuries and they are finding out the hard way this is a draft-first league. They were so insecure about fan fare and being #1 in NY, they didn't want to be patient. Now, we're in a predicament where we can't tank or trade any of these guys for picks. Yes, we have a nice following in Brooklyn and built a popular brand but at what cost?
I see both sides of why they were careless and why diehards fans are angry but I don't think there is more in the Kidd situation that correlates to management being unprofessional or shady with Kidd. I understand everyone is upset with the season and the way things are being handled with An but at the end of the day, Jason Kidd was always a snake. The stupidity of King, Rasumov and Proky doesn't change that Kidd is an opportunistic con man.
The NBPA plans to open an investigation on Kidd's agent, Jeff Schwartz. Which says a lot if they feel his agent was operating illegally during the process. Kidd shouldn't have been hired but I don't blame them at all for letting him go.