MrDollarBills wrote:Here's the problem. you assume that we have a chance to land Durant and Lebron regardless of us being a lottery team. That in itself has been historically proven to be highly unlikely.
im fine with highly unlikely. if we were able to pull it off it would change the landscape of the NBA and make us an elite franchise for several years. for me, it is well worth not bringing back a role player in thad young in order to gaurantee having the space to offer them both the max.
It's not about Thad, or the extra max slot. You assume that we have a chance to pair up two of the world's top 3 players on a team that is lottery bound w/o a pick in next year's draft, while luring them away from winning situations that will only get better with the coming cap increases...
lebron left a team that had made 4 straight finals and won 2 straight titles to go to a lottery team and play with kevin love, someone nowhere near durants level.
what leads you to remotely believe that
a)they want to play together?
teaming up is their best chance to win
b)they would want to take the risk of playing for a team that is by far viewed to be in one of the worst possible situations basketball wise?
no team they go to together would be in one of the worst possible situations
c)would want to play with Lopez/Bojan/RHJ as opposed to Westbrook/Ibaka or Irving/Love?
durant is better then love/irving. lebron is better then westbrook/ibaka. they cant team up on cleveland or OKC. those teams dont have the capspace for both
d)would want to take less money to do so? OKC and CLE can pay them the most and also offer better situations
not better situations. lebron + durant is better then cleveland if lebron stayed or okc if durant stayed.
You can't call out Net Sentence and others for being homers and having higher hopes about this roster's playoff chances this season and in the same breath complain about retaining Thad because it ruins a .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% chance of convincing Lebron James and Kevin Durant to leave great basketball situations to come to a losing team. Thinking that the Nets are some kind of special destination because we'd have two max slots if we had let Thad walk is homering.
i never denied it was more then a 1% or less chance. my point is why throw away event that small chance for thad young. thad young is a nobody. you dont throw away even a small chance at something that huge for thad young
You have killed Brook on here (as have I, and for good reason), yet you think he's some kind of selling point as opposed to playing with an A Tier baller like Westbrook???
again, OKC cant afford lebron and durant. the draw here would be they could team up.
Lebron would want to skip out on being the league's highest paid player (we cannot offer that to him no matter how much you complain about Thad), playing with two A Tier ballers in Irving and Love to come to play with Brook and the possibility of Kevin Durant...thats as if Durant wants to play here, and with him in the first place? Your argument has been flawed from the start because both players would have to take less money to play here. The max slots are irrelevant because we cannot offer the money that OKC and CLE can.
again, okc and cle cant team them up. and the extra money isnt all that relevant in this era, where stars are opting for shorter contracts, so that last year and higher raise is less relevant and recent msot stars have chose 3-4 years deals anyhow. and if they want the money over winning, then its moot.
Please take a step back, look at what you've been arguing about...its honestly not even remotely in the depths of reality. And frankly, irrational.
irrational is thinking that thad young is worth throwing away a .000001% chance at durant/lebron.
i will never understand why anyone would think having thad young in a throw away season is so important that you would throw away cap money