ImageImageImage

Leafs Offseason Discussion

Moderator: Crowned

ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 13,984
And1: 2,831
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#141 » by ATLTimekeeper » Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:01 pm

_venom_ wrote:
YogiStewart wrote:the Kuleiman deal is really a headshaker.
if i were the GM, i wouldn't even bring him back. 7 goals. ugg.
but...he got a RAISE compared to his 1st contract. why??

when you're the 5th worst team in the NHL, you need to make changes. bringing back a 7 goal 2-way player is not the way to make change.

this also means that guys like Colborne, Kadri, Frattin, D'Amigo are not making the team. which roster spot(s) are available?


He is one year removed from scoring 30 goals and arguably being our best forward. He had a bad year yes but he was still great defensively, he hits and he's discipline. Letting Kulemin go for nothing would have been an absolutely (Please Use More Appropriate Word) move. Kulemin will have a bounce back season and put up 20+ goals and that deal will be a bargain. Kulemin is not the forward we should be shedding to make room for the young guys, it should be Connolly/Lombardi/Steckel....


Bingo. He's had more 15+ goal seasons than he has 7. Good signing.
User avatar
Morris_Shatford
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 15,366
And1: 1,288
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Location: Section 118
       

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#142 » by Morris_Shatford » Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:03 pm

While its sorta off topic;

The Leafs could have outbid the Rangers in what they ultimately paid to land Nash,
Given the low cost and Burkes need to make some degree of deal to impact the roster, what gives?
Image
Thanks to Turbozone for the Sig!
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 13,984
And1: 2,831
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#143 » by ATLTimekeeper » Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:44 pm

Morris_Shatford wrote:While its sorta off topic;

The Leafs could have outbid the Rangers in what they ultimately paid to land Nash,
Given the low cost and Burkes need to make some degree of deal to impact the roster, what gives?


No clue, especially considering we had interest in him. Kind of surprised there isn't more outrage.
_venom_
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,953
And1: 99
Joined: Oct 25, 2007
       

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#144 » by _venom_ » Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:27 pm

The Leafs were not on Nash's list of teams he'd be willing to go to.
Crowned
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 4,362
And1: 10
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Toronto

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#145 » by Crowned » Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:57 am

^This.

We weren't on his list, there were very few that were. If we were, he'd be a Leaf...almost guaranteed.
User avatar
Relentless88
RealGM
Posts: 11,739
And1: 80
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
       

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#146 » by Relentless88 » Wed Aug 15, 2012 6:57 pm

The NHLPA submitted their latest proposal yesterday. Less revenue for players and expanded revenue sharing program. It seems as though the players have diverted this from owners vs. players to big market owners vs. small market owners?

Anyways, what are the implications of this for the Leafs (they are a big market..), and how likely is it that we avoid a lockout? I can't even imagine what another lockout would do to the league...
User avatar
Secueritae
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,508
And1: 1,583
Joined: Apr 23, 2009
   

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#147 » by Secueritae » Thu Aug 16, 2012 5:06 pm

How is TSN going to cope if there's a lockout??
Seems they show 20 minutes worth of highlights like 2 mins a game with a seperate screen to show the final score and top 5 players on each team, not to mention have those analysts on each Canadian team game. In contrast they show 1-2 buckets (20 seconds) per NBA game and have that small box underneath with the final score and 1 top player.
How will they cope having to cover NBA games more and only show 5-10 mins worth of lockout progress?
User avatar
whysoserious
RealGM
Posts: 20,299
And1: 2,028
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
       

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#148 » by whysoserious » Fri Aug 17, 2012 7:43 pm

I am fairly certain they will just fill that time covering the lockout itself with hockey specials and what not. It's a joke trying to watch a sports news cast and to have to wait 20 minutes to get 10 minutes of all the other sports only to reset and start all over again.
Image
User avatar
Morris_Shatford
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 15,366
And1: 1,288
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Location: Section 118
       

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#149 » by Morris_Shatford » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:06 pm

Crowned wrote:
We weren't on his list, there were very few that were. If we were, he'd be a Leaf...almost guaranteed.


Based on Burke's almost flawless record of getting big deals done?
Image
Thanks to Turbozone for the Sig!
User avatar
Adrian_05
RealGM
Posts: 15,846
And1: 1,895
Joined: Aug 22, 2012
     

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#150 » by Adrian_05 » Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:10 pm

Morris_Shatford wrote:
Crowned wrote:
We weren't on his list, there were very few that were. If we were, he'd be a Leaf...almost guaranteed.


Based on Burke's almost flawless record of getting big deals done?

I guess the fact that the Leafs could have put together a better package than the rangers did.
Crowned
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 4,362
And1: 10
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Toronto

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#151 » by Crowned » Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:33 pm

Morris_Shatford wrote:
Crowned wrote:
We weren't on his list, there were very few that were. If we were, he'd be a Leaf...almost guaranteed.


Based on Burke's almost flawless record of getting big deals done?


Based on the fact that he could've offered a more attractive package than what they ended up with. He could've thrown Kadri, Schenn, Colborne and a pick at Columbus, and it would've been a better deal.
User avatar
whysoserious
RealGM
Posts: 20,299
And1: 2,028
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
       

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#152 » by whysoserious » Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:31 pm

So Allaire is out as Goaltending Coach. I wasn't a fan of his work overall with the guys on the big club but this shows again the problems with this organization where too many people interject and try to assert themselves in areas they should back off. I don't see things getting better with Rogers/Bell on board.

It's so sad to watch this **** constantly for so long with Toronto sports franchises.
Image
User avatar
sanity
RealGM
Posts: 17,551
And1: 1,804
Joined: Jul 08, 2009

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#153 » by sanity » Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:26 am

Was it Allaire who attempted to turn Gustavsson into a butterfly goalie? If so he pretty much ruined his 2011-2012 year
User avatar
Bankai
RealGM
Posts: 21,996
And1: 8,796
Joined: Oct 16, 2006
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#154 » by Bankai » Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:49 am

I hear that the Leafs were interested in going for Roberto Luongo. I think its a good idea. They need that bonifide starting goalie. Ive seen Roberto give up poor goals in the past, but when he is on, he is ON! And as we have seen with Halak and Quick, you just need your Goalie to get hot in the playoffs and your team could ride him all the way to the Stanley Cup Final.
User avatar
GREY 1769
Head Coach
Posts: 7,245
And1: 4,291
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: White and Red Blue and White
   

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#155 » by GREY 1769 » Sat Nov 17, 2012 3:31 am

Not sure where to post this, but while we wait for the lockout to end, there's some Leafs related news in that Burke is doing some great charity work. He's the co-chair of Sleep Out: Executive Edition for Covenant House, an organization that helps homeless youth.

http://covhou.convio.net/site/TR/SleepOut/National?sid=1100&type=fr_informational&pg=informational&fr_id=1080

Yahoo article:

http://ca.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/downtown-toronto-maple-leafs-gm-brian-burke-slept-212424275--nhl.html

Say what you will about the product he puts together on the ice, but off the ice he gets top marks for his involvement in bringing attention to and actively supporting important causes. :clap:
ImageImage
User avatar
Adrian_05
RealGM
Posts: 15,846
And1: 1,895
Joined: Aug 22, 2012
     

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#156 » by Adrian_05 » Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:27 pm

Good on BB for doing that. :clap:
User avatar
Brew666
Junior
Posts: 421
And1: 16
Joined: Apr 13, 2010

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#157 » by Brew666 » Mon Jan 7, 2013 10:04 pm

Ok, there''s not much left but what do people think will be BB plans for the rest of the offseason?

We have 2 amnesty clauses and Franson is still a RFA. I'm hoping one amnesty is spent on Komi and then we hold on to the other one (no idea when it would expire). Then with the money saved, we resign Franson (not a huge a fan of him but we shouldn't let him walk). I don't really see a point in amnestying Connolly or Lombardi b/c they're off the books by next year anyhow. If we have a significant piece we can add, sure, but I don't expect that.

Other than that I'd hold steady b/c I don't know how to gauge this team. It feels like we see 2 different teams play every year; whether it's the team that comes out like hot stink and drops a record number games in a row or vice-versa. Though it' s a shortened season, I think mgmt has to decide this year whether to continue the current path or blow it up (again). If we're out of the playoff race, then it's time to have a fire sale with whatever assets we have and start all over again. If we're in the running, then continue with what we have.
"I'm just happy to say on behalf of all the hoodie-wearers everywhere that MLB is back in line with a subculture that I can really, truly identify with."
- Joe Maddon
User avatar
whysoserious
RealGM
Posts: 20,299
And1: 2,028
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
       

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#158 » by whysoserious » Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:51 pm

If the Leafs are smart, there is no better year to tank for them than now. A shortened season, no high end talent available right at the moment. This year should be about leaving guys like Kadri up and playing them heavy and teaching them. They've got capspace coming on the horizaon whereas many teams are capped out.

Don't make the move for Luongo, stay the course for one more shortened season. Making a quick push to the playoffs this year would be about the worse thing they could do right now.
Image
User avatar
whysoserious
RealGM
Posts: 20,299
And1: 2,028
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
       

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#159 » by whysoserious » Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:21 pm

Leafs put Connoly on waivers for a potential buyout. The cap hit still counts, this one makes no sense. he expires after this season anyway. That's a total waste of a compliance buyout IMO.
Image
User avatar
Homer Jay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,494
And1: 672
Joined: Nov 30, 2003

Re: Leafs Offseason Discussion 

Post#160 » by Homer Jay » Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:01 pm

whysoserious wrote:Leafs put Connoly on waivers for a potential buyout. The cap hit still counts, this one makes no sense. he expires after this season anyway. That's a total waste of a compliance buyout IMO.


Want to open up a roster spot maybe?

Down the centre this year looks like Bozak, JVR, Steckel, and McClement. Grabo can play C in a pinch and they probably want to bring up Colborne at some point this year as well. Leo Komarov will probably given a looksy as well.

Just no room for Conolly.

I think this strongly indicates that they intend to keep Bozak and the deal for Luongo as rumoured could be dead.
Image

Return to Toronto Maple Leafs