Chicago and Indiana are better
Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, mpharris36, GONYK, HerSports85
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
- PicheDreams
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,040
- And1: 113
- Joined: Feb 18, 2012
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Boozer Nate robinson and Richard Hamilton are better?..
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
- 23-7
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,806
- And1: 466
- Joined: Apr 04, 2007
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
- Nuntius
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 20,302
- And1: 17,358
- Joined: Feb 28, 2012
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Thugger HBC wrote:If those teams were better, they'd have the better record.
You are what your record says you are.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Do you still hold that point of view?
"No wolf shall keep his secrets, no bird shall dance the skyline
And I am left with nothing but an oath that gleams like a sword
To bathe in the blood of man
Mankind..."
She Painted Fire Across the Skyline, Part 3
- Agalloch
And I am left with nothing but an oath that gleams like a sword
To bathe in the blood of man
Mankind..."
She Painted Fire Across the Skyline, Part 3
- Agalloch
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 49,679
- And1: 18,760
- Joined: Jan 14, 2011
- Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Nuntius wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:If those teams were better, they'd have the better record.
You are what your record says you are.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Do you still hold that point of view?
why wouldn't I? do they both have a better record?
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20
Gone, but will never be forgotten
Gone, but will never be forgotten
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
- Nuntius
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 20,302
- And1: 17,358
- Joined: Feb 28, 2012
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Thugger HBC wrote:Nuntius wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:If those teams were better, they'd have the better record.
You are what your record says you are.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Do you still hold that point of view?
why wouldn't I? do they both have a better record?
The Pacers do.
"No wolf shall keep his secrets, no bird shall dance the skyline
And I am left with nothing but an oath that gleams like a sword
To bathe in the blood of man
Mankind..."
She Painted Fire Across the Skyline, Part 3
- Agalloch
And I am left with nothing but an oath that gleams like a sword
To bathe in the blood of man
Mankind..."
She Painted Fire Across the Skyline, Part 3
- Agalloch
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 49,679
- And1: 18,760
- Joined: Jan 14, 2011
- Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Played more games too, that's why they have more losses.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20
Gone, but will never be forgotten
Gone, but will never be forgotten
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
- Nuntius
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 20,302
- And1: 17,358
- Joined: Feb 28, 2012
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Thugger HBC wrote:Played more games too, that's why they have more losses.
So, that means that they will have more rest towards the end of the season
It doesn't change the fact that the Pacers are 13 games over .500 while the Knicks are 12 games over .500
"No wolf shall keep his secrets, no bird shall dance the skyline
And I am left with nothing but an oath that gleams like a sword
To bathe in the blood of man
Mankind..."
She Painted Fire Across the Skyline, Part 3
- Agalloch
And I am left with nothing but an oath that gleams like a sword
To bathe in the blood of man
Mankind..."
She Painted Fire Across the Skyline, Part 3
- Agalloch
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 49,679
- And1: 18,760
- Joined: Jan 14, 2011
- Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Fair point, i expect this to contnue all year.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20
Gone, but will never be forgotten
Gone, but will never be forgotten
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,859
- And1: 349
- Joined: Dec 19, 2008
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Records tend to fluctuate. However trends can be telling, Indy started rough, largely because they didn't expect Granger to be out at all, let alone for more than half the season and it took time to adjust, after their 4-7 start they've been elite though. Over the last 44:
SAS 34-10
OKC 32-12
Miami 32-12
LAC 31-13
Indiana 30-14
DEN 29-15
MEM 27-17
NYK- 23-21
Curiously Indy has the 5th best record in the NBA over this period, consistent with their 5th best finish last season. Granger is the X-Factor though, as they had him last year and he hasn't played yet this year.
SAS 34-10
OKC 32-12
Miami 32-12
LAC 31-13
Indiana 30-14
DEN 29-15
MEM 27-17
NYK- 23-21
Curiously Indy has the 5th best record in the NBA over this period, consistent with their 5th best finish last season. Granger is the X-Factor though, as they had him last year and he hasn't played yet this year.
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,148
- And1: 134
- Joined: Jul 09, 2012
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Bump.....just to remind some guys....this "playoff run" and it's ending vs. Indy was very easy to predict if you aren't still brainwashed by that small ball bull.
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,238
- And1: 468
- Joined: Jun 24, 2011
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
pacers are better without granger. he's an addition by subtraction type player.
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
- HarthorneWingo
- RealGM
- Posts: 90,887
- And1: 55,694
- Joined: May 16, 2005
- Location: In Your Head, USA
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Nuntius wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:Played more games too, that's why they have more losses.
So, that means that they will have more rest towards the end of the season
It doesn't change the fact that the Pacers are 13 games over .500 while the Knicks are 12 games over .500
Please stop twisting yourself into a pretzel to rationalize in your own mind that the Knicks are better - or just as good as Indiana. We are not.
Free Palestine
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,889
- And1: 4,552
- Joined: Dec 31, 2005
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Benedict Cumberbatch (Star Trek) to play both Chicago and Indiana quoting, "I am better...at every thing."
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
- Nuntius
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 20,302
- And1: 17,358
- Joined: Feb 28, 2012
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
HawthorneWingo wrote:Please stop twisting yourself into a pretzel to rationalize in your own mind that the Knicks are better - or just as good as Indiana. We are not.
Woot?
I'm a Pacers fan, my friend.
"No wolf shall keep his secrets, no bird shall dance the skyline
And I am left with nothing but an oath that gleams like a sword
To bathe in the blood of man
Mankind..."
She Painted Fire Across the Skyline, Part 3
- Agalloch
And I am left with nothing but an oath that gleams like a sword
To bathe in the blood of man
Mankind..."
She Painted Fire Across the Skyline, Part 3
- Agalloch
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
- StephNYKurry
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,669
- And1: 2,198
- Joined: May 11, 2011
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Leaguepass wrote:Bump.....just to remind some guys....this "playoff run" and it's ending vs. Indy was very easy to predict if you aren't still brainwashed by that small ball bull.
Kenny Smith said it last night.
The playoffs, often times, is not about who's "better". It's about matchups and who plays the best in the 7 game series.
It's not entirely about being "better".
Fact of the matter is that the Heat smash EVERYONE with a healthy Wade and the Knicks are still the 2nd best team in the East they play to their potential, but that's a sketchy proposition when one of your primary weapons is a hot/cold guy.
What do I care...it's rigged anyway
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,148
- And1: 134
- Joined: Jul 09, 2012
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
StephNYKurry wrote:Leaguepass wrote:Bump.....just to remind some guys....this "playoff run" and it's ending vs. Indy was very easy to predict if you aren't still brainwashed by that small ball bull.
Kenny Smith said it last night.
The playoffs, often times, is not about who's "better". It's about matchups and who plays the best in the 7 game series.
It's not entirely about being "better".
Fact of the matter is that the Heat smash EVERYONE with a healthy Wade and the Knicks are still the 2nd best team in the East they play to their potential, but that's a sketchy proposition when one of your primary weapons is a hot/cold guy.
95% of the time playing defense,controlling the boards,scoring in the paint,not settling for jumpers,getting to the FT line is gonna win the playoffs. Woodson tried to disprove that through his small ball bull philosophy and got completely destroyed by Vogel and his right approach. If anyone thinks this is just some sort of weird coincidence he needs his head checked because playing iso 90% of the time, while giving up a double digit margin on the boards and shooting half the FTs that your opposition shoots is gonna make you lose a series. If the Knicks' coaches and FO truly think the same way some fans think then we're gonna be in for another dissapointing playoffs next season.
If our current Knick team plays 10 playoff series vs. the current Pacers (meaning we play our small ball crap)---the Pacers will remain victorious 9 out of 10 times.
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 49,679
- And1: 18,760
- Joined: Jan 14, 2011
- Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
The scary part about the Pacers is they really dont have a bench.
They could roll Granger out as a sixth man or trade his expirer for depth.
That's pretty scary, not even to mention how young they are.
They could roll Granger out as a sixth man or trade his expirer for depth.
That's pretty scary, not even to mention how young they are.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20
Gone, but will never be forgotten
Gone, but will never be forgotten
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 56,667
- And1: 19,009
- Joined: Oct 05, 2002
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Thugger HBC wrote:The scary part about the Pacers is they really dont have a bench.
They could roll Granger out as a sixth man or trade his expirer for depth.
That's pretty scary, not even to mention how young they are.
a lot of things can happen over the course of a summer and the season
NY just needs to focus on themselves and not worry about other teams, we know the east will be good next year
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 49,679
- And1: 18,760
- Joined: Jan 14, 2011
- Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Pharmcat wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:The scary part about the Pacers is they really dont have a bench.
They could roll Granger out as a sixth man or trade his expirer for depth.
That's pretty scary, not even to mention how young they are.
a lot of things can happen over the course of a summer and the season
NY just needs to focus on themselves and not worry about other teams, we know the east will be good next year
Makes sense, but not realistic....teams base their rosters according to the landscape.
Knicks were built for one team, but were vulnerable to one in the path.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20
Gone, but will never be forgotten
Gone, but will never be forgotten
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 56,667
- And1: 19,009
- Joined: Oct 05, 2002
Re: Chicago and Indiana are better
Thugger HBC wrote:Pharmcat wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:The scary part about the Pacers is they really dont have a bench.
They could roll Granger out as a sixth man or trade his expirer for depth.
That's pretty scary, not even to mention how young they are.
a lot of things can happen over the course of a summer and the season
NY just needs to focus on themselves and not worry about other teams, we know the east will be good next year
Makes sense, but not realistic....teams base their rosters according to the landscape.
Knicks were built for one team, but were vulnerable to one in the path.
what if West leaves IND?
I just dont see how a team can plan for all of the east PO teams