ImageImageImageImageImage

Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi

User avatar
JYD31
Ballboy
Posts: 22
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#1 » by JYD31 » Mon Jul 15, 2013 6:51 pm

Just a simple question -- why have the Knicks completely ignored the trade they made for Andrea Bargnani? You can have an opinion on whether he's a good player/fit for this team, but regardless of that I have never seen a trade where we acquired a player of this magnitude (or comparable) go unmentioned by the team.

I am aware that Grunwald held a short phone conference to announce the deal, but no live presser/photo-op/Q&A -- not even any mention on the team's official website! He is listed on the active roster, but there is not even a link to an article or anything. It's really not anything necessary I suppose, but it just struck me as very strange how under-the-radar this deal went.

Thoughts?
"Exceptional." - Phil Jackson
"Phenomonal." - A'mare Stoudemire
"Shrewd. Clever. Slick." - Walt Frazier
"Dope." - J.R. Smith
User avatar
Tron Carter
RealGM
Posts: 17,534
And1: 20,138
Joined: Jul 20, 2012
Location: NBA Purgatory

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#2 » by Tron Carter » Mon Jul 15, 2013 6:53 pm

because we cant have nice things.
Image
R.I.P Black Mamba
User avatar
AmazingJason
RealGM
Posts: 15,179
And1: 6,142
Joined: Aug 07, 2006
Location: NYC
   

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#3 » by AmazingJason » Mon Jul 15, 2013 6:55 pm

I have no idea. Personally, I think Bargnani should have a huge role here, but I have a feeling he may end up being a backup like Cope. In some ways, it comes down to Bargnani vs. JR. We need a PG out there to run the show, Shump to play D, Melo to score, Tyson to guard the interior. Is Woodson really going to cut down JR's minutes to play Bargnani?
BAT 18.0 - MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES

El Poochio - POBO
Amazing Jason - Assistant to the VPOBO

PG: Lonzo Ball/Dennis Smith Jr.
SG: Donovan Mitchell/R. McGruder
SF: Jaylen Brown/Josh Jackson
PF: Jayson Tatum/T. Booker
C: Joel Embiid/McGee
suicidedeuce
And1: 0

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#4 » by suicidedeuce » Mon Jul 15, 2013 6:58 pm

Its called managing expectations.

Its is very common for entities such as sports teams or movie studios to attempt to manage expectations.

Like when Man of Steel came out - the studio (in this case, Warners Bros.) will always leak to the press a low-ball prediction for the opening weekend box office. They want to be able to say if the numbers come back lower than what the press and box officer trackers are predicting that they're happy with the results and the movie is a success.

I'll give you another example.

Stoudemire being on a 20 mpg limit and may not play the back-to-backs.

This is CLASSIC managing expectations. They are trying to lower the bar in the eyes of fans and the media so if Stat is able to go out there and play 25+ mins a night and play some back-to-backs, it looks like he exceeded expectations.

There is NO way the KNicks REALLY believe he'll be on those restrictions and are sharing it with the public NOW. They're trying to lower the bar.

I suspect they don't want to try to set bargnani up as the big new addition that will come and take the team to a new level. I suspect they want him going into the year free of the expectations that plagued him in Toronto and are simply going low profile to help that along.
User avatar
Thorn
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,093
And1: 2,162
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: New York
Contact:
       

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#5 » by Thorn » Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:01 pm

suicidedeuce wrote:Its called managing expectations.

Its is very common for entities such as sports teams or movie studios to attempt to manage expectations.

Like when Man of Steel came out - the studio (in this case, Warners Bros.) will always leak to the press a low-ball prediction for the opening weekend box office. They want to be able to say if the numbers come back lower than what the press and box officer trackers are predicting that they're happy with the results and the movie is a success.

I'll give you another example.

Stoudemire being on a 20 mpg limit and may not play the back-to-backs.

This is CLASSIC managing expectations. They are trying to lower the bar in the eyes of fans and the media so if Stat is able to go out there and play 25+ mins a night and play some back-to-backs, it looks like he exceeded expectations.

There is NO way the KNicks REALLY believe he'll be on those restrictions and are sharing it with the public NOW. They're trying to lower the bar.

I suspect they don't want to try to set bargnani up as the big new addition that will come and take the team to a new level. I suspect they want him going into the year free of the expectations that plagued him in Toronto and are simply going low profile to help that along.



Words of wisdom.
Image
User avatar
Fat
RealGM
Posts: 33,470
And1: 25,601
Joined: Jan 12, 2013
Location: Queens, NY

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#6 » by Fat » Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:01 pm

Bargnani's to sexy for the Camera
Baf: Heat Culture
Cap Space $500+
Deaaron Fox $350/1
Jabari smith jr $70/1
Anthony Black $43/2
Ochai Agbaji $46/4
Trayce Jackson Davis $16/2
Caleb Martin $15/4
Jaylen Wells $13/2
Portland 2026 1st not available
H20FAN
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,433
And1: 389
Joined: Dec 10, 2011
Location: Flushing, NY
     

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#7 » by H20FAN » Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:04 pm

Maybe there is a second deal in place and Knicks are waiting to do the pressor when both deals are done. C'MON LET IT BE RONDO!!!
They call me hadoken because i'm down right fierce
User avatar
Wildcat
RealGM
Posts: 14,601
And1: 4,434
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Astoria, NY
 

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#8 » by Wildcat » Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:04 pm

I assume a press conference will be held later in the off-season when all the pieces fall. If that's not the case, like someone said, maybe we're cribbing expectations. Doesn't matter to me, though.
BowlRips
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,682
And1: 2,930
Joined: Jul 16, 2009
     

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#9 » by BowlRips » Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:04 pm

dont want to put that my pressure on him
Brickz7
Senior
Posts: 519
And1: 19
Joined: Aug 03, 2012

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#10 » by Brickz7 » Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:12 pm

because its bargnani ..lmao
Knicks_Fan2
RealGM
Posts: 20,348
And1: 4,675
Joined: May 14, 2010

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#11 » by Knicks_Fan2 » Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:15 pm

suicidedeuce wrote:Its called managing expectations.

Its is very common for entities such as sports teams or movie studios to attempt to manage expectations.

Like when Man of Steel came out - the studio (in this case, Warners Bros.) will always leak to the press a low-ball prediction for the opening weekend box office. They want to be able to say if the numbers come back lower than what the press and box officer trackers are predicting that they're happy with the results and the movie is a success.

I'll give you another example.

Stoudemire being on a 20 mpg limit and may not play the back-to-backs.

This is CLASSIC managing expectations. They are trying to lower the bar in the eyes of fans and the media so if Stat is able to go out there and play 25+ mins a night and play some back-to-backs, it looks like he exceeded expectations.

There is NO way the KNicks REALLY believe he'll be on those restrictions and are sharing it with the public NOW. They're trying to lower the bar.

I suspect they don't want to try to set bargnani up as the big new addition that will come and take the team to a new level. I suspect they want him going into the year free of the expectations that plagued him in Toronto and are simply going low profile to help that along.


Excellent post.
User avatar
j4remi
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 38,163
And1: 20,048
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
         

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#12 » by j4remi » Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:18 pm

I just saw something about Woody saying Bargs might move into the starting line-up...I think it was on ESPN New York.
C- Turner | Wiseman
PF- Hunter |Clowney | Fleming
SF- Bridges| George
SG- Dick | Bogdanovic
PG- Haliburton | Sasser
Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#13 » by Cliff Levingston » Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:18 pm

Does anyone know how they plan to use Bargnani? Not to be an **** but he was pretty terrible on the Raptors, and just about all he has going for him is that he's paid $10+ mil per year and was once a 1st overall pick. But, we've seen plenty of 1st overall picks bust out and bust out hard, like Kwame Brown who settled into a role as a decent back-up center for a little while. Raptors fans seem to think Bargnani was getting as much PT as he was because Colangelo was trying to justify him as the pick, then later, to try to show him off for a trade.

So, do they see him as a starting 4 playing 25-30+ minutes per game, or just a situational player who can pose some match up problems with his shooting ability? Considering the Knicks led the league in 3 point attempts, it seems they could use some more rebounding or a post player more than a big man who's proven he can do little else than shoot the 3 during his disappointing career.
goldenbrandon
Senior
Posts: 734
And1: 106
Joined: Feb 13, 2012

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#14 » by goldenbrandon » Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:23 pm

Cliff Levingston wrote:Does anyone know how they plan to use Bargnani? Not to be an **** but he was pretty terrible on the Raptors, and just about all he has going for him is that he's paid $10+ mil per year and was once a 1st overall pick. But, we've seen plenty of 1st overall picks bust out and bust out hard, like Kwame Brown who settled into a role as a decent back-up center for a little while. Raptors fans seem to think Bargnani was getting as much PT as he was because Colangelo was trying to justify him as the pick, then later, to try to show him off for a trade.

So, do they see him as a starting 4 playing 25-30+ minutes per game, or just a situational player who can pose some match up problems with his shooting ability? Considering the Knicks led the league in 3 point attempts, it seems they could use some more rebounding or a post player more than a big man who's proven he can do little else than shoot the 3 during his disappointing career.


Well he won't be first option here so he'll do better. As the number one option he was bad but as 3rd option he's just what the doctor ordered
User avatar
TwentyOne920
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,679
And1: 129
Joined: Jun 29, 2012

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#15 » by TwentyOne920 » Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:24 pm

Cause the Knicks don't wanna admit they got fleeced by Ujiri AGAIN?
bertrob wrote:Any casual fan saying anything about Tim Duncan is usually wrong


bobly wrote:Kobe locked up his All Defensive Team this year after he blocked Lebron in the all-star game.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 80,853
And1: 94,237
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#16 » by thebuzzardman » Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:27 pm

So a ballboy could start a useless thread.
Image
cgmw
RealGM
Posts: 22,521
And1: 10,419
Joined: Jul 23, 2003
Location: Winning now since 1973
Contact:
 

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#17 » by cgmw » Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:38 pm

suicidedeuce wrote:Its called managing expectations.

Its is very common for entities such as sports teams or movie studios to attempt to manage expectations.

Like when Man of Steel came out - the studio (in this case, Warners Bros.) will always leak to the press a low-ball prediction for the opening weekend box office. They want to be able to say if the numbers come back lower than what the press and box officer trackers are predicting that they're happy with the results and the movie is a success.

I'll give you another example.

Stoudemire being on a 20 mpg limit and may not play the back-to-backs.

This is CLASSIC managing expectations. They are trying to lower the bar in the eyes of fans and the media so if Stat is able to go out there and play 25+ mins a night and play some back-to-backs, it looks like he exceeded expectations.

There is NO way the KNicks REALLY believe he'll be on those restrictions and are sharing it with the public NOW. They're trying to lower the bar.

I suspect they don't want to try to set bargnani up as the big new addition that will come and take the team to a new level. I suspect they want him going into the year free of the expectations that plagued him in Toronto and are simply going low profile to help that along.

I agree with all of this. However, the simplest explanation could be that Bargnani is currently playing for the Italians in Italy, isn't he? Seems awfully harsh to make the guy fly back for a presser.
"Sell the team. Sell the team. Sell the team."
User avatar
nyk4L7_21
Pro Prospect
Posts: 948
And1: 471
Joined: Jul 07, 2013
       

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#18 » by nyk4L7_21 » Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:50 pm

A part of me feels like one of the major reasons Grunnie did this trade was as insurance for Stoudemire when he inevitably misses a few games (generous, ik) with an injury.

This team as currently constructed is supposed to be based around having two high scoring forwards carry the offensive load, and Bargs fits that bill as he can possibly compliment Melo very well in the starting lineup with Bargs on the perimeter and Melo posting up.

With Stoudemire healthy and playing though it gets iffy. It's easy to say that he'd just take Novak's minutes but Bargnani I feel isn't properly utilized as a 15 mpg spot up shooter off the bench; that hasn't ever been his game/role since he's been in the league.
User avatar
Deeeez Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 49,190
And1: 55,066
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#19 » by Deeeez Knicks » Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:52 pm

Another Illuminati coverup. They got to Grunnie.
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
makeitstop
General Manager
Posts: 9,987
And1: 2,274
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade? 

Post#20 » by makeitstop » Mon Jul 15, 2013 9:31 pm

It was covered on all sports media, in every major newspaper. Bargs did a conference call to talk to reporters.

I'm at a loss as to how you conclude the story was 'buried.'
'Every night ending in 'Y' is a rock fight when you're playing the New York Knicks.' - World Wide Wob

Return to New York Knicks