Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
- JYD31
- Ballboy
- Posts: 22
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jan 27, 2009
Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
Just a simple question -- why have the Knicks completely ignored the trade they made for Andrea Bargnani? You can have an opinion on whether he's a good player/fit for this team, but regardless of that I have never seen a trade where we acquired a player of this magnitude (or comparable) go unmentioned by the team.
I am aware that Grunwald held a short phone conference to announce the deal, but no live presser/photo-op/Q&A -- not even any mention on the team's official website! He is listed on the active roster, but there is not even a link to an article or anything. It's really not anything necessary I suppose, but it just struck me as very strange how under-the-radar this deal went.
Thoughts?
I am aware that Grunwald held a short phone conference to announce the deal, but no live presser/photo-op/Q&A -- not even any mention on the team's official website! He is listed on the active roster, but there is not even a link to an article or anything. It's really not anything necessary I suppose, but it just struck me as very strange how under-the-radar this deal went.
Thoughts?
"Exceptional." - Phil Jackson
"Phenomonal." - A'mare Stoudemire
"Shrewd. Clever. Slick." - Walt Frazier
"Dope." - J.R. Smith
"Phenomonal." - A'mare Stoudemire
"Shrewd. Clever. Slick." - Walt Frazier
"Dope." - J.R. Smith
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
- Tron Carter
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,534
- And1: 20,138
- Joined: Jul 20, 2012
- Location: NBA Purgatory
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
because we cant have nice things.

R.I.P Black Mamba
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
- AmazingJason
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,179
- And1: 6,142
- Joined: Aug 07, 2006
- Location: NYC
-
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
I have no idea. Personally, I think Bargnani should have a huge role here, but I have a feeling he may end up being a backup like Cope. In some ways, it comes down to Bargnani vs. JR. We need a PG out there to run the show, Shump to play D, Melo to score, Tyson to guard the interior. Is Woodson really going to cut down JR's minutes to play Bargnani?
BAT 18.0 - MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES
El Poochio - POBO
Amazing Jason - Assistant to the VPOBO
PG: Lonzo Ball/Dennis Smith Jr.
SG: Donovan Mitchell/R. McGruder
SF: Jaylen Brown/Josh Jackson
PF: Jayson Tatum/T. Booker
C: Joel Embiid/McGee
El Poochio - POBO
Amazing Jason - Assistant to the VPOBO
PG: Lonzo Ball/Dennis Smith Jr.
SG: Donovan Mitchell/R. McGruder
SF: Jaylen Brown/Josh Jackson
PF: Jayson Tatum/T. Booker
C: Joel Embiid/McGee
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
-
- And1: 0
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
Its called managing expectations.
Its is very common for entities such as sports teams or movie studios to attempt to manage expectations.
Like when Man of Steel came out - the studio (in this case, Warners Bros.) will always leak to the press a low-ball prediction for the opening weekend box office. They want to be able to say if the numbers come back lower than what the press and box officer trackers are predicting that they're happy with the results and the movie is a success.
I'll give you another example.
Stoudemire being on a 20 mpg limit and may not play the back-to-backs.
This is CLASSIC managing expectations. They are trying to lower the bar in the eyes of fans and the media so if Stat is able to go out there and play 25+ mins a night and play some back-to-backs, it looks like he exceeded expectations.
There is NO way the KNicks REALLY believe he'll be on those restrictions and are sharing it with the public NOW. They're trying to lower the bar.
I suspect they don't want to try to set bargnani up as the big new addition that will come and take the team to a new level. I suspect they want him going into the year free of the expectations that plagued him in Toronto and are simply going low profile to help that along.
Its is very common for entities such as sports teams or movie studios to attempt to manage expectations.
Like when Man of Steel came out - the studio (in this case, Warners Bros.) will always leak to the press a low-ball prediction for the opening weekend box office. They want to be able to say if the numbers come back lower than what the press and box officer trackers are predicting that they're happy with the results and the movie is a success.
I'll give you another example.
Stoudemire being on a 20 mpg limit and may not play the back-to-backs.
This is CLASSIC managing expectations. They are trying to lower the bar in the eyes of fans and the media so if Stat is able to go out there and play 25+ mins a night and play some back-to-backs, it looks like he exceeded expectations.
There is NO way the KNicks REALLY believe he'll be on those restrictions and are sharing it with the public NOW. They're trying to lower the bar.
I suspect they don't want to try to set bargnani up as the big new addition that will come and take the team to a new level. I suspect they want him going into the year free of the expectations that plagued him in Toronto and are simply going low profile to help that along.
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
- Thorn
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 7,093
- And1: 2,162
- Joined: May 29, 2007
- Location: New York
- Contact:
-
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
suicidedeuce wrote:Its called managing expectations.
Its is very common for entities such as sports teams or movie studios to attempt to manage expectations.
Like when Man of Steel came out - the studio (in this case, Warners Bros.) will always leak to the press a low-ball prediction for the opening weekend box office. They want to be able to say if the numbers come back lower than what the press and box officer trackers are predicting that they're happy with the results and the movie is a success.
I'll give you another example.
Stoudemire being on a 20 mpg limit and may not play the back-to-backs.
This is CLASSIC managing expectations. They are trying to lower the bar in the eyes of fans and the media so if Stat is able to go out there and play 25+ mins a night and play some back-to-backs, it looks like he exceeded expectations.
There is NO way the KNicks REALLY believe he'll be on those restrictions and are sharing it with the public NOW. They're trying to lower the bar.
I suspect they don't want to try to set bargnani up as the big new addition that will come and take the team to a new level. I suspect they want him going into the year free of the expectations that plagued him in Toronto and are simply going low profile to help that along.
Words of wisdom.

Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
- Fat
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,470
- And1: 25,601
- Joined: Jan 12, 2013
- Location: Queens, NY
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
Bargnani's to sexy for the Camera
Baf: Heat Culture
Cap Space $500+
Deaaron Fox $350/1
Jabari smith jr $70/1
Anthony Black $43/2
Ochai Agbaji $46/4
Trayce Jackson Davis $16/2
Caleb Martin $15/4
Jaylen Wells $13/2
Portland 2026 1st not available
Cap Space $500+
Deaaron Fox $350/1
Jabari smith jr $70/1
Anthony Black $43/2
Ochai Agbaji $46/4
Trayce Jackson Davis $16/2
Caleb Martin $15/4
Jaylen Wells $13/2
Portland 2026 1st not available
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,433
- And1: 389
- Joined: Dec 10, 2011
- Location: Flushing, NY
-
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
Maybe there is a second deal in place and Knicks are waiting to do the pressor when both deals are done. C'MON LET IT BE RONDO!!!
They call me hadoken because i'm down right fierce
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
- Wildcat
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,601
- And1: 4,434
- Joined: Aug 07, 2002
- Location: Astoria, NY
-
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
I assume a press conference will be held later in the off-season when all the pieces fall. If that's not the case, like someone said, maybe we're cribbing expectations. Doesn't matter to me, though.
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,682
- And1: 2,930
- Joined: Jul 16, 2009
-
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
dont want to put that my pressure on him
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
-
- Senior
- Posts: 519
- And1: 19
- Joined: Aug 03, 2012
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
because its bargnani ..lmao
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,348
- And1: 4,675
- Joined: May 14, 2010
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
suicidedeuce wrote:Its called managing expectations.
Its is very common for entities such as sports teams or movie studios to attempt to manage expectations.
Like when Man of Steel came out - the studio (in this case, Warners Bros.) will always leak to the press a low-ball prediction for the opening weekend box office. They want to be able to say if the numbers come back lower than what the press and box officer trackers are predicting that they're happy with the results and the movie is a success.
I'll give you another example.
Stoudemire being on a 20 mpg limit and may not play the back-to-backs.
This is CLASSIC managing expectations. They are trying to lower the bar in the eyes of fans and the media so if Stat is able to go out there and play 25+ mins a night and play some back-to-backs, it looks like he exceeded expectations.
There is NO way the KNicks REALLY believe he'll be on those restrictions and are sharing it with the public NOW. They're trying to lower the bar.
I suspect they don't want to try to set bargnani up as the big new addition that will come and take the team to a new level. I suspect they want him going into the year free of the expectations that plagued him in Toronto and are simply going low profile to help that along.
Excellent post.
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
- j4remi
- Forum Mod - Knicks
- Posts: 38,163
- And1: 20,048
- Joined: Jun 23, 2008
-
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
I just saw something about Woody saying Bargs might move into the starting line-up...I think it was on ESPN New York.
C- Turner | Wiseman
PF- Hunter |Clowney | Fleming
SF- Bridges| George
SG- Dick | Bogdanovic
PG- Haliburton | Sasser
PF- Hunter |Clowney | Fleming
SF- Bridges| George
SG- Dick | Bogdanovic
PG- Haliburton | Sasser
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,667
- And1: 1,094
- Joined: May 29, 2003
- Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
-
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
Does anyone know how they plan to use Bargnani? Not to be an **** but he was pretty terrible on the Raptors, and just about all he has going for him is that he's paid $10+ mil per year and was once a 1st overall pick. But, we've seen plenty of 1st overall picks bust out and bust out hard, like Kwame Brown who settled into a role as a decent back-up center for a little while. Raptors fans seem to think Bargnani was getting as much PT as he was because Colangelo was trying to justify him as the pick, then later, to try to show him off for a trade.
So, do they see him as a starting 4 playing 25-30+ minutes per game, or just a situational player who can pose some match up problems with his shooting ability? Considering the Knicks led the league in 3 point attempts, it seems they could use some more rebounding or a post player more than a big man who's proven he can do little else than shoot the 3 during his disappointing career.
So, do they see him as a starting 4 playing 25-30+ minutes per game, or just a situational player who can pose some match up problems with his shooting ability? Considering the Knicks led the league in 3 point attempts, it seems they could use some more rebounding or a post player more than a big man who's proven he can do little else than shoot the 3 during his disappointing career.
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
-
- Senior
- Posts: 734
- And1: 106
- Joined: Feb 13, 2012
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
Cliff Levingston wrote:Does anyone know how they plan to use Bargnani? Not to be an **** but he was pretty terrible on the Raptors, and just about all he has going for him is that he's paid $10+ mil per year and was once a 1st overall pick. But, we've seen plenty of 1st overall picks bust out and bust out hard, like Kwame Brown who settled into a role as a decent back-up center for a little while. Raptors fans seem to think Bargnani was getting as much PT as he was because Colangelo was trying to justify him as the pick, then later, to try to show him off for a trade.
So, do they see him as a starting 4 playing 25-30+ minutes per game, or just a situational player who can pose some match up problems with his shooting ability? Considering the Knicks led the league in 3 point attempts, it seems they could use some more rebounding or a post player more than a big man who's proven he can do little else than shoot the 3 during his disappointing career.
Well he won't be first option here so he'll do better. As the number one option he was bad but as 3rd option he's just what the doctor ordered
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
- TwentyOne920
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,679
- And1: 129
- Joined: Jun 29, 2012
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
Cause the Knicks don't wanna admit they got fleeced by Ujiri AGAIN?
bertrob wrote:Any casual fan saying anything about Tim Duncan is usually wrong
bobly wrote:Kobe locked up his All Defensive Team this year after he blocked Lebron in the all-star game.
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 80,853
- And1: 94,237
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,521
- And1: 10,419
- Joined: Jul 23, 2003
- Location: Winning now since 1973
- Contact:
-
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
suicidedeuce wrote:Its called managing expectations.
Its is very common for entities such as sports teams or movie studios to attempt to manage expectations.
Like when Man of Steel came out - the studio (in this case, Warners Bros.) will always leak to the press a low-ball prediction for the opening weekend box office. They want to be able to say if the numbers come back lower than what the press and box officer trackers are predicting that they're happy with the results and the movie is a success.
I'll give you another example.
Stoudemire being on a 20 mpg limit and may not play the back-to-backs.
This is CLASSIC managing expectations. They are trying to lower the bar in the eyes of fans and the media so if Stat is able to go out there and play 25+ mins a night and play some back-to-backs, it looks like he exceeded expectations.
There is NO way the KNicks REALLY believe he'll be on those restrictions and are sharing it with the public NOW. They're trying to lower the bar.
I suspect they don't want to try to set bargnani up as the big new addition that will come and take the team to a new level. I suspect they want him going into the year free of the expectations that plagued him in Toronto and are simply going low profile to help that along.
I agree with all of this. However, the simplest explanation could be that Bargnani is currently playing for the Italians in Italy, isn't he? Seems awfully harsh to make the guy fly back for a presser.
"Sell the team. Sell the team. Sell the team."
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
- nyk4L7_21
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 948
- And1: 471
- Joined: Jul 07, 2013
-
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
A part of me feels like one of the major reasons Grunnie did this trade was as insurance for Stoudemire when he inevitably misses a few games (generous, ik) with an injury.
This team as currently constructed is supposed to be based around having two high scoring forwards carry the offensive load, and Bargs fits that bill as he can possibly compliment Melo very well in the starting lineup with Bargs on the perimeter and Melo posting up.
With Stoudemire healthy and playing though it gets iffy. It's easy to say that he'd just take Novak's minutes but Bargnani I feel isn't properly utilized as a 15 mpg spot up shooter off the bench; that hasn't ever been his game/role since he's been in the league.
This team as currently constructed is supposed to be based around having two high scoring forwards carry the offensive load, and Bargs fits that bill as he can possibly compliment Melo very well in the starting lineup with Bargs on the perimeter and Melo posting up.
With Stoudemire healthy and playing though it gets iffy. It's easy to say that he'd just take Novak's minutes but Bargnani I feel isn't properly utilized as a 15 mpg spot up shooter off the bench; that hasn't ever been his game/role since he's been in the league.
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
- Deeeez Knicks
- Forum Mod - Knicks
- Posts: 49,190
- And1: 55,066
- Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
Another Illuminati coverup. They got to Grunnie.
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,987
- And1: 2,274
- Joined: Nov 21, 2007
Re: Why have the Knicks buried the Bargnani trade?
It was covered on all sports media, in every major newspaper. Bargs did a conference call to talk to reporters.
I'm at a loss as to how you conclude the story was 'buried.'
I'm at a loss as to how you conclude the story was 'buried.'
'Every night ending in 'Y' is a rock fight when you're playing the New York Knicks.' - World Wide Wob