dakomish23 wrote:suicidedeuce wrote:dakomish23 wrote:I think you gotta compare apples to apples. When that happens, maybe you're proven rt. but I want to see that even comparison.
Then do it.
All you're demonstrating is you acknowledge really have NO idea at all how Smith and Afflalo compare as players and any conclusions you're making now would be without any objective merit.
You seem to think its somehow more necessary for me to provide evidence of how they compare, but you're no closer to supporting any conclusions conversely.
Who used the stats in the argument in the first place? After shooting down one of your stats, now you want me to show you stats that show Affalo is better. It's been clear from my first post that you can't rely strictly on stats - so I have no need to conjure up evidence. You do it. You're the one who lives and dies by the stats. I'll take the eye test 11 out of 10 times.
How about we stop with this pretense that the term "eye test" means anything more than "in my opinion." To try to give it any extra meaning is dishonest.
And I'd further question the honestly of any Knick fans who claimed their "eye test" (i.e. their personal opinion) was based on anything more than the occasional, anecdotal observation of the player in question. Is anyone here really claiming to have not only seen the majority of Orlanda Magic games the last 2 seasons, but to have closely observed Aaron Afflalo's impact during them?
I'm halfway hoping one of you claim you have, because then I'll fairly be able to ask to explain in "eye test" rather than statistical terms specifically why his time on the floor negatively impacts their play? Someone who's truly observed Afflalo's ability and impact on the game and can speak intelligently on it based purely on observation could reasonably be expected to explain in similar specific detail what is occurring and who is responsible for the negative impact if not him?
Here's the hypothesis - Aaron Afflalo is a good two way player, who's historical negative impact on his team's play is largely due to the inadaquate play of this teammates.
So bypassing statistical analysis, which one of you "eye test" guys can explain exactly why they occurs in specific detail?
And generally speaking, here's the more fundamental problem with the "in my opinion" .., I mean "eye test" standard.
I'm having a disagreement with one different users, both relying solely on the "eye test", who don't agree with one another.
dakomish23, you're made no mention of Affalo's declining defensive ability the last 2 seasons, you seem to contend he remains a strong 2 way player recognized a such by the majority of the NBA. Your basis is the "eye test".
Thugger believes he's been a bad defensive player the last 2 seasons. His basis is the "eye test".
So who's "eye test" is accurate? Yours or his?