Isiahthomass wrote:2010 wrote:The reason I think this heinous act is important to discuss (besides the obvious loss of human life) is because it strengthens the pro-police officer sentiment in how thin the line is for cops when assessing how to deal with potential situations that may arise in the line of duty. You only really get a split second to make a decision and it could cost you your life. And sub-standard human beings like Demetrius Blackwell will only get more unarmed civilians killed as a result of what he's done.
I think it doesn't necessarily strengthen anything, because police officers are well aware of the dangers that they face everyday when they go out on those streets. They very well know that they may not be going home when their shift ends.
I think linking it to more unarmed citizens being killed as a result of what Demetrius Blackwell did is a bit weak. From my understanding, he didn't pat the guy down, he didn't restrain him, he was just speaking to him. This could happen to any police officer if they meet the wrong person in the street. That is the reality of any police officers' world, one that the general public seems to have a difficult time perceiving.
You and several posters here have expressed similar feeling. Policing is dangerous, risk of death is part of the job. Anyone can be armed and ready to shoot.
But if you accept that, dont you have to also accept that cops are going to act accordingly to that. Take extra precautions. Make sure they themselves and the public are safe.
So when you charge at a cop, they will defend themselves. If you resist arrest, they will restrain you. Isnt that to be accepted as well.
Not saying there arent bad cops, bad shootings etc. But there is a two way street to this tension.