Bill Pidto wrote:
That may sound harsh to the people who still think Melo should be here, but the reality is that Melo and Marbury do have a few major things in common. Both experienced a steep decline in their game while the Knicks were forced to pay them mega millions til the bitter end. And both were ball-dominant all-stars who, in their prime, could still never seem to win anything significant for this franchise. I will give you that, OP.
Melo's decline is more due to age and injuries, and thus we are seeing him struggle as he tries to transition his game. Someone else mentioned Ewing, and I think that comparison may be more appropriate. Obviously Ewing was better and more successful, but I'm not really comparing their respective games. Both guys aged and were still trying to do things they couldn't anymore, and the fanbase turned on them, particularly with younger players waiting in the wings. Both players were also criticized for not being as good as other/better players at their position -- Ewing vs Hakeem, Robinson, and then Shaq; Melo vs LeBron, Wade, and Durant. And finally, neither guy was really given enough support around him to win it all.
Marbury's decline was steeper, and not really even due to health or ability. For him, it was more like his attitude, selfishness, ego, spite, low IQ, and general mental instability finally caught up to him. The guy was borderline uncoachable, even from the start, and had no idea how to play team basketball or win, but teams were willing to turn a blind eye for a time because of his talent.
Melo may have a few of those characteristics, but not nearly to the extent of Marbury. And he has won and accomplished far more in this league than Marbs.