LostInACrowd wrote:SMAC-K wrote:LostInACrowd wrote:
Moteijunas's deal wasn't a dodged bullet. The contract was set up so the Nets had the option to drop him after every year. If they didn't like him, they would only of had to pay him for this year.
The Crabbe deal probably was a dodged bullet. But a 24 year old who shoots 46% fg, 43% 3pt and 85% ft and plays good defense would of fit in pretty well on a Nets team that's among the leaders in 3pt shots taken and one of the worst defensive teams in the league.
But what exactly was Crabbe going to do for the Nets anyways? He's an average player and the Nets knew that to even get that type of player to sign with them they had to be willing to overpay. What for? If he was like the missing piece to the puzzle then ok I understand, but the Nets weren't going anywhere and everybody knew it. You can add Crabbe to the mix and they still wouldn't have won more than 10 games so far this season. It made way more sense for the Blazers to resign him because they were a playoff team that wasn't looking to break up it's team after winning 45 games last season. But for the Nets to sign him to that deal in hopes of him becoming some key piece to a 20 win team was questionable.
What you are saying would make sense if he were 30+ years old. But, he is 24. They weren't signing him for just this year. The Nets are looking for young talent that might become part of the core in 4-5 years.
I'm not sure who you think they should have been trying to sign that was available and willing to play for them.
I see your point. The free agent market kind of sucked last year