Woodshed 1914 wrote:Wolfgang630 wrote:Woodshed 1914 wrote:The New York Knicks are 9-51(15%) when Carmelo Anthony is not in the lineup.......
That's not really saying much. Any team missing their one and only star player will be worse without him.
It's saying a whole lot. 9-51 doesn't tell me that he was the teams one and only star. It tells me that he's the teams only player that could move the needle between wins and losses. It can't be understated how badly management failedMelo during the Phil era but what's done is done. Below is a list of players considered to be head and shoulders above melo at this point of his career:
61% - Blake Griffin's Teammates (51-32)
54% - Kevin Durant's Teammates (46-39)
44% - Paul George's Teammates (37-47):
32% - Anthony Davis Teammates (24-51)
15% - Anthony's Teammates (9-51)
Blake Griffin was drafted by the Clippers not traded for assets, gutting the team he was going to.
Paul George was drafted by the Pacers not traded for assets, gutting the team he was going to
Anthony Davis was drafted by the Pelicans not traded for assets, gutting the team he was going to.
Kevin Durant was drafted by Seattle/OKC and then went as a free agent to the Warriors-- neither event involved trading assets and gutting the team he was going to.
Apples to apples. My hunch, my premise in fact is that the Knicks would have had a much better record without Melo in the game had he waited for free agency. The actual value of your list is that it emphasizes just how bad the Knicks became and how ruinous the Melo trade actually was.