Synciere wrote:TrueWarrior wrote:Synciere wrote:
I see a lot of momentum for iHart to remain the starter, even though he's not the defender Mitch is. Are those in favor of keeping iHart as a starter also in favor of resigning him to a deal greater than Mitch's? How high should the Knicks be willing to go to resign him? 15 mil? 18?
Where do you guys get the stuff saying Hartenstein isnt as good on D as Mitch?
He’s literally ranked as the best defender in the NBA according to everyone’s new favorite stat EPM: https://dunksandthrees.com/epm.
Many posters still taking iHart for granted. He’s legit. More mobile than Mitch, just as good on D/boards, and way more useful on offense.
Yes he should be paid more than Mitch and be the starter. Mitch is always hurt and hasnt improved. He can get moved for a more versatile big as we shouldnt tie too much money up in the C spot.
Yeah I like stats and all but the eye test tells me Mitch is a better defender than iHart. iHart is the better offensive player though he isnt given much in terms of usage with Jalen and Julius on the team.
Not sure what you’re seeing then man. iHart has been all over the place.
Mitch is a great defender and rebounder for sure, but Hartenstein handled Anthony Davis and Gobert like they were nothing recently. Grabbed 20 rebounds on Andre Drummond last night. We’ll see how he does against Embiid, but obviously Embiid is an MVP and Mitch has trouble with him too like everyone does.
Does anyone see Mitch developing anything more to his game? Hartenstein is the same age as him and is a decent jumper away from being a pretty damn complete player.