ImageImageImageImageImage

Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich

Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, mpharris36, GONYK, HerSports85

User avatar
Gravy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,848
And1: 7,623
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
     

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1381 » by Gravy » Tue Feb 27, 2024 8:38 pm

Wildcat wrote:I'm not hip with the uptick here. Why are the vocal few dogging the trade with a hurt roster?

There needs to be a sticky at the top of each page reminding everyone that three starters are out and Bojan is not supposed to be in this role.
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 28,556
And1: 10,024
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
Location: laser shield bitches

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1382 » by cgf » Tue Feb 27, 2024 10:26 pm

cgmw wrote:
TrueWarrior wrote:
cgmw wrote:The bigger reality is that message board heroes love hoping for their draft picks and now feel butthurt by the adults in the FO confirming that Grimes had no future here. Bogey and Burks are easy escape goats.

IMO Thibs gave up on Grimes probably the minute Grimes spoke out in the media. And once Thibs is done with you he’s done with you.

Bogey and Burks are a solution to the problem created by the OG trade, which was compounded by OG getting injured. At worst, it’s a reasonable gamble with very limited downside. At best, it could be the push needed to sneak into the ECF. Time will tell.

One thing’s for damn sure, Grimes wasn’t preventing this 5 game slide with our entire front court hurt.


Lol Bojan and Alec havent looked like a solution to anything but losing more. The least they can do is make shots and hold the line against benches, and they cant even do that.

You guys realize them just being on the court has hurt the team right? Bojan has always been a negative player, even in his Jazz/Pacer days, according to advanced stats like RAPTOR and EPM. There are two sides of the court. And we already know about Alec, who is only older now. Im not only basing this on the last 5 games.

Im far from a Grimes fanboy, as Donte is clearly better, but he was a positive overall because of his defense. Meanwhile Fournier has actually outplayed Bojan and Alec since the trade. Just because Thibs is a petty bastard doesnt mean Evan is completely done. He could have given us 15 mpg off the bench if he got to stay in rhythm, but he went from starting to the gulag.

Let’s see how it goes though, I hope they shut me up, it’s early, blah blah blah yada yada.

Ok so you’re saying the team is better off playing Charlie Brown and Budget Obi.

I mean, ok. That’s certainly one way to see it. Seems radically negative to me and like you’re blaming the wrong guys for the current losing streak, which (again) Grimes wasn’t preventing, especially since he’d permanently entered Thibs’ inescapable doghouse.

It was a move to add rotation depth. You’re claiming Bogey and Burks are net negatives so we’d be better off with scrubs or just running the starters 40 mpg. To which I counter, our scrubs are worse. And the only thing running the starters 40 mpg accomplishes is getting them injured.


Grimes was escaping Thibs' "inescapable doghouse". His more assertive play had him regularly getting over 20mpg again. No need to exaggerate things to defend the FO choosing to use Grimes instead of a FRP.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
cgmw
RealGM
Posts: 22,022
And1: 9,564
Joined: Jul 23, 2003
Location: Winning now since 1973
Contact:
 

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1383 » by cgmw » Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:04 pm

cgf wrote:
cgmw wrote:
TrueWarrior wrote:
Lol Bojan and Alec havent looked like a solution to anything but losing more. The least they can do is make shots and hold the line against benches, and they cant even do that.

You guys realize them just being on the court has hurt the team right? Bojan has always been a negative player, even in his Jazz/Pacer days, according to advanced stats like RAPTOR and EPM. There are two sides of the court. And we already know about Alec, who is only older now. Im not only basing this on the last 5 games.

Im far from a Grimes fanboy, as Donte is clearly better, but he was a positive overall because of his defense. Meanwhile Fournier has actually outplayed Bojan and Alec since the trade. Just because Thibs is a petty bastard doesnt mean Evan is completely done. He could have given us 15 mpg off the bench if he got to stay in rhythm, but he went from starting to the gulag.

Let’s see how it goes though, I hope they shut me up, it’s early, blah blah blah yada yada.

Ok so you’re saying the team is better off playing Charlie Brown and Budget Obi.

I mean, ok. That’s certainly one way to see it. Seems radically negative to me and like you’re blaming the wrong guys for the current losing streak, which (again) Grimes wasn’t preventing, especially since he’d permanently entered Thibs’ inescapable doghouse.

It was a move to add rotation depth. You’re claiming Bogey and Burks are net negatives so we’d be better off with scrubs or just running the starters 40 mpg. To which I counter, our scrubs are worse. And the only thing running the starters 40 mpg accomplishes is getting them injured.


Grimes was escaping Thibs' "inescapable doghouse". His more assertive play had him regularly getting over 20mpg again. No need to exaggerate things to defend the FO choosing to use Grimes instead of a FRP.

I have about as much knowledge of the inside of Thibs' head as you do that the Pistons would have accepted a FRP instead of Grimes.
"Sell the team. Sell the team. Sell the team."
JayTWill
Junior
Posts: 331
And1: 115
Joined: May 14, 2011

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1384 » by JayTWill » Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:22 pm

Gravy wrote:
Wildcat wrote:I'm not hip with the uptick here. Why are the vocal few dogging the trade with a hurt roster?

There needs to be a sticky at the top of each page reminding everyone that three starters are out and Bojan is not supposed to be in this role.


What is his role supposed to be? That is what confuses me about this trade if Bojan and Burks can't be helpful now. I don't think any of the players that are out due to injury are replaceable with the players that were brought in. If we do not have health we are not going anywhere. When the team was healthy the starting lineup was fine. We had no issue with guys playing off of Brunson and Randle. The biggest weakness were the non-Brunson minutes and lack of creation ability in the second unit. Why do we have to wait until the starters get back to see some improvement in the non-Brunson bench minutes?

In January the rotation seemed to be heading to the starters plus a bench rotation of McBride/Grimes/Hart/(OG)/Precious.
I guess Thibs could run out a similar 9 man rotation at full strength with McBride or Burks/Hart/Bogy/(OG)/Mitch or Precious but that would require someone in that unit to be a consistent offensive initiator. McBride and Burks have not proven they could do that. Can Bogy? Maybe swapping out Grimes will make that unit more effective. I'm just curious to what you think about it.

It may not matter much in the playoffs since Brunson will likely be on the floor for most minutes but the combination of Brunson and Bogy on the floor together possibly with another average to poor defender concerns me a bit. OG and our bigs can be incredible defensively but there is a breaking point to what they are able to cover up.
seren
RealGM
Posts: 24,151
And1: 4,210
Joined: Jul 21, 2002

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1385 » by seren » Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:38 pm

Gravy wrote:
Wildcat wrote:I'm not hip with the uptick here. Why are the vocal few dogging the trade with a hurt roster?

There needs to be a sticky at the top of each page reminding everyone that three starters are out and Bojan is not supposed to be in this role.


Interesting. What you are saying is the FO made the trade with no idea of how long the recovery time would be for Randle, Mitchell and OG?

And I am curious what you think Bojan’s role is right now. What have you seen on the floor that is atypical?
cgmw
RealGM
Posts: 22,022
And1: 9,564
Joined: Jul 23, 2003
Location: Winning now since 1973
Contact:
 

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1386 » by cgmw » Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:45 pm

seren wrote:
Gravy wrote:
Wildcat wrote:I'm not hip with the uptick here. Why are the vocal few dogging the trade with a hurt roster?

There needs to be a sticky at the top of each page reminding everyone that three starters are out and Bojan is not supposed to be in this role.


Interesting. What you are saying is the FO made the trade with no idea of how long the recovery time would be for Randle, Mitchell and OG?

And I am curious what you think Bojan’s role is right now. What have you seen on the floor that is atypical?

You're one of the smartest dudes on here which is why this comment is just so bizarre.

You really don't think that losing 25ppg from Randle with All-NBA defense from OG and Mitch (and iHart) doesn't affect the role of each and every player (including Bogey)?

Bogey is a known commodity. Dude is a professional scorer who can shoot lights out and give you minutes at either the three or four. It's not some great mystery and neither is the fact that 60% of our starters are out so IDK why fans are acting dumb here.

We won't know what we have as a team until later in the season if/when our core guys get healthy.
"Sell the team. Sell the team. Sell the team."
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 28,556
And1: 10,024
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
Location: laser shield bitches

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1387 » by cgf » Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:49 pm

cgmw wrote:
cgf wrote:
cgmw wrote:Ok so you’re saying the team is better off playing Charlie Brown and Budget Obi.

I mean, ok. That’s certainly one way to see it. Seems radically negative to me and like you’re blaming the wrong guys for the current losing streak, which (again) Grimes wasn’t preventing, especially since he’d permanently entered Thibs’ inescapable doghouse.

It was a move to add rotation depth. You’re claiming Bogey and Burks are net negatives so we’d be better off with scrubs or just running the starters 40 mpg. To which I counter, our scrubs are worse. And the only thing running the starters 40 mpg accomplishes is getting them injured.


Grimes was escaping Thibs' "inescapable doghouse". His more assertive play had him regularly getting over 20mpg again. No need to exaggerate things to defend the FO choosing to use Grimes instead of a FRP.

I have about as much knowledge of the inside of Thibs' head as you do that the Pistons would have accepted a FRP instead of Grimes.


True, but in Burks 6 games as a Knick this season he's played 14, 19, 13, 30, 17, 22 minutes, for 115 total. In Grimes final 6 games as a knick he played 20, 32, 24, 23, 20, 20 minutes, for a total of 139 minutes. So it looks like this depth that got brought in is deeper in the doghouse than Grimes was :dontknow:
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
seren
RealGM
Posts: 24,151
And1: 4,210
Joined: Jul 21, 2002

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1388 » by seren » Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:59 pm

cgmw wrote:
seren wrote:
Gravy wrote:There needs to be a sticky at the top of each page reminding everyone that three starters are out and Bojan is not supposed to be in this role.


Interesting. What you are saying is the FO made the trade with no idea of how long the recovery time would be for Randle, Mitchell and OG?

And I am curious what you think Bojan’s role is right now. What have you seen on the floor that is atypical?

You're one of the smartest dudes on here which is why this comment is just so bizarre.

You really don't think that losing 25ppg from Randle with All-NBA defense from OG and Mitch (and iHart) doesn't affect the role of each and every player (including Bogey)?

Bogey is a known commodity. Dude is a professional scorer who can shoot lights out and give you minutes at either the three or four. It's not some great mystery and neither is the fact that 60% of our starters are out so IDK why fans are acting dumb here.

We won't know what we have as a team until later in the season if/when our core guys get healthy.


That still doesn’t answer the question. What role is Bogey playing right now that he would normally not be playing? Dude is coming from the bench and playing the lowest minutes of his career. He is playing mostly SF with couple of minutes here and there at PF. Are you expecting him to even have a lesser role? Are you thinking he is too much of a playmaker now? Guys just need to be clear what they mean.
cgmw
RealGM
Posts: 22,022
And1: 9,564
Joined: Jul 23, 2003
Location: Winning now since 1973
Contact:
 

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1389 » by cgmw » Wed Feb 28, 2024 12:37 am

seren wrote:
cgmw wrote:
seren wrote:
Interesting. What you are saying is the FO made the trade with no idea of how long the recovery time would be for Randle, Mitchell and OG?

And I am curious what you think Bojan’s role is right now. What have you seen on the floor that is atypical?

You're one of the smartest dudes on here which is why this comment is just so bizarre.

You really don't think that losing 25ppg from Randle with All-NBA defense from OG and Mitch (and iHart) doesn't affect the role of each and every player (including Bogey)?

Bogey is a known commodity. Dude is a professional scorer who can shoot lights out and give you minutes at either the three or four. It's not some great mystery and neither is the fact that 60% of our starters are out so IDK why fans are acting dumb here.

We won't know what we have as a team until later in the season if/when our core guys get healthy.


That still doesn’t answer the question. What role is Bogey playing right now that he would normally not be playing? Dude is coming from the bench and playing the lowest minutes of his career. He is playing mostly SF with couple of minutes here and there at PF. Are you expecting him to even have a lesser role? Are you thinking he is too much of a playmaker now? Guys just need to be clear what they mean.

I’m expecting each and every player to play a different role when Randle, OG, and/or Mitch are back.

Watching Grimes with the fully healthy unit, it sure looked clear as day that his role was diminishing and that he couldn’t be relied upon in the crunch.

I don’t have a crystal ball so I can’t answer your question (spoiler: nobody can), but there seems to be plenty of track record on Bogey to feel optimism that he’ll be able to play the Thibs release-valve shooter as well as spot mins as the Thibs iso creator, especially with two all-world defenders in Mitch and OG masking his weaknesses. Time will tell.
"Sell the team. Sell the team. Sell the team."
cgmw
RealGM
Posts: 22,022
And1: 9,564
Joined: Jul 23, 2003
Location: Winning now since 1973
Contact:
 

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1390 » by cgmw » Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:02 am

cgf wrote:
cgmw wrote:
cgf wrote:
Grimes was escaping Thibs' "inescapable doghouse". His more assertive play had him regularly getting over 20mpg again. No need to exaggerate things to defend the FO choosing to use Grimes instead of a FRP.

I have about as much knowledge of the inside of Thibs' head as you do that the Pistons would have accepted a FRP instead of Grimes.


True, but in Burks 6 games as a Knick this season he's played 14, 19, 13, 30, 17, 22 minutes, for 115 total. In Grimes final 6 games as a knick he played 20, 32, 24, 23, 20, 20 minutes, for a total of 139 minutes. So it looks like this depth that got brought in is deeper in the doghouse than Grimes was :dontknow:

Seriously?

I’m not even a big fan of this trade but you guys are being ridiculous. Honestly can’t tell if you’re just trolling.

Last I checked it was Grimes in exchange for two rotation players, not just Burks. No bullsh*t, I honestly have no idea what you’re trying to say by comparing just Grimes’ minutes to just Burks, who was the second player we received, not the only player.

If you want an apples to apples minutes comparison try Grimes + Fournier (0 mpg) to Bogey + Burks.
"Sell the team. Sell the team. Sell the team."
JayTWill
Junior
Posts: 331
And1: 115
Joined: May 14, 2011

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1391 » by JayTWill » Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:35 am

After a bit of tinkering with the bench unit Thibs seemed to settle on a rotation of:
Starters - Brunson/DDV/OG/Randle/iHart
Bench - McBride/Grimes/Hart/(OG)/Achiuwa

Here are the points scored/points allowed per 100 possessions for those 2 line ups

Starters - 128.3/111.2_______+17.1 (374 possessions)
Bench - 104.0/84.7________+19.3 (75 possessions)

The starters dominated teams offensively and the bench dominated defensively. The bench unit was not pretty but it was effective. There are other line ups that transition between the starters and the bench but I'm curious how the new additions will fit if the team is fully healthy. They definitely don't fit the defensive identity of the previous bench unit and the starting unit isn't lacking scoring.
User avatar
Fat Kat
RealGM
Posts: 32,255
And1: 29,570
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
     

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1392 » by Fat Kat » Wed Feb 28, 2024 3:29 am

Guess how many points Grimes and Fournier combined for tonight

Image

-14 plus/minus for Grimes. -5 for Evan. In a win
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
User avatar
Gravy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,848
And1: 7,623
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
     

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1393 » by Gravy » Wed Feb 28, 2024 5:50 am

JayTWill wrote:
Gravy wrote:
Wildcat wrote:I'm not hip with the uptick here. Why are the vocal few dogging the trade with a hurt roster?

There needs to be a sticky at the top of each page reminding everyone that three starters are out and Bojan is not supposed to be in this role.


What is his role supposed to be? That is what confuses me about this trade if Bojan and Burks can't be helpful now. I don't think any of the players that are out due to injury are replaceable with the players that were brought in. If we do not have health we are not going anywhere. When the team was healthy the starting lineup was fine. We had no issue with guys playing off of Brunson and Randle. The biggest weakness were the non-Brunson minutes and lack of creation ability in the second unit. Why do we have to wait until the starters get back to see some improvement in the non-Brunson bench minutes?

In January the rotation seemed to be heading to the starters plus a bench rotation of McBride/Grimes/Hart/(OG)/Precious.
I guess Thibs could run out a similar 9 man rotation at full strength with McBride or Burks/Hart/Bogy/(OG)/Mitch or Precious but that would require someone in that unit to be a consistent offensive initiator. McBride and Burks have not proven they could do that. Can Bogy? Maybe swapping out Grimes will make that unit more effective. I'm just curious to what you think about it.

It may not matter much in the playoffs since Brunson will likely be on the floor for most minutes but the combination of Brunson and Bogy on the floor together possibly with another average to poor defender concerns me a bit. OG and our bigs can be incredible defensively but there is a breaking point to what they are able to cover up.

The team is much more dangerous when Bojan is the 5th or 6th scorer instead of the 2nd scorer like he was tonight. When the team is healthy you can hopefully cover for him defensively next to Deuce and Ihart/Precious. The starters are the entire reason the non Brunson bench minutes work or not. Its like taking Tatum and Brown off the Celtics and wondering why KP isnt making them a contender.
User avatar
Wildcat
RealGM
Posts: 11,304
And1: 1,532
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Astoria, NY
 

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1394 » by Wildcat » Thu Feb 29, 2024 4:10 pm

Gravy wrote:The team is much more dangerous when Bojan is the 5th or 6th scorer instead of the 2nd scorer like he was tonight. When the team is healthy you can hopefully cover for him defensively next to Deuce and Ihart/Precious. The starters are the entire reason the non Brunson bench minutes work or not. Its like taking Tatum and Brown off the Celtics and wondering why KP isnt making them a contender.


Just to add to that, I haven't looked at the statistics and going purely on the eye test, but Bojan isn't exactly a scrub out there on defense, either. Certainly not grade A or anything but I'm not looking at the L's right now and putting it on him or Burks (and I'm not a big Burks fan, either).

The Knicks are going to take on the chin. They got hit with the injury bug. It happens. They just have to play .500 ball until everyone's back. I'm still eyeing Randle's return for the Detroit game at the end of the month. OG evaluation should be today or tomorrow. We could probably see him back maybe on the 8th or 14th for the West Coast trip.
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 133,470
And1: 127,043
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1395 » by god shammgod » Thu Feb 29, 2024 4:17 pm

Wildcat wrote:
Gravy wrote:The team is much more dangerous when Bojan is the 5th or 6th scorer instead of the 2nd scorer like he was tonight. When the team is healthy you can hopefully cover for him defensively next to Deuce and Ihart/Precious. The starters are the entire reason the non Brunson bench minutes work or not. Its like taking Tatum and Brown off the Celtics and wondering why KP isnt making them a contender.


Just to add to that, I haven't looked at the statistics and going purely on the eye test, but Bojan isn't exactly a scrub out there on defense, either. Certainly not grade A or anything but I'm not looking at the L's right now and putting it on him or Burks (and I'm not a big Burks fan, either).

The Knicks are going to take on the chin. They got hit with the injury bug. It happens. They just have to play .500 ball until everyone's back. I'm still eyeing Randle's return for the Detroit game at the end of the month. OG evaluation should be today or tomorrow. We could probably see him back maybe on the 8th or 14th for the West Coast trip.


no, he is. he definitely is.
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 28,556
And1: 10,024
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
Location: laser shield bitches

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1396 » by cgf » Thu Feb 29, 2024 5:18 pm

god shammgod wrote:
Wildcat wrote:
Gravy wrote:The team is much more dangerous when Bojan is the 5th or 6th scorer instead of the 2nd scorer like he was tonight. When the team is healthy you can hopefully cover for him defensively next to Deuce and Ihart/Precious. The starters are the entire reason the non Brunson bench minutes work or not. Its like taking Tatum and Brown off the Celtics and wondering why KP isnt making them a contender.


Just to add to that, I haven't looked at the statistics and going purely on the eye test, but Bojan isn't exactly a scrub out there on defense, either. Certainly not grade A or anything but I'm not looking at the L's right now and putting it on him or Burks (and I'm not a big Burks fan, either).

The Knicks are going to take on the chin. They got hit with the injury bug. It happens. They just have to play .500 ball until everyone's back. I'm still eyeing Randle's return for the Detroit game at the end of the month. OG evaluation should be today or tomorrow. We could probably see him back maybe on the 8th or 14th for the West Coast trip.


no, he is. he definitely is.


Yeah his metrics are almost impressively bad.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
KNICKS007
Sophomore
Posts: 212
And1: 137
Joined: Jan 03, 2017
       

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1397 » by KNICKS007 » Thu Feb 29, 2024 5:23 pm

god shammgod wrote:
Wildcat wrote:
Gravy wrote:The team is much more dangerous when Bojan is the 5th or 6th scorer instead of the 2nd scorer like he was tonight. When the team is healthy you can hopefully cover for him defensively next to Deuce and Ihart/Precious. The starters are the entire reason the non Brunson bench minutes work or not. Its like taking Tatum and Brown off the Celtics and wondering why KP isnt making them a contender.


Just to add to that, I haven't looked at the statistics and going purely on the eye test, but Bojan isn't exactly a scrub out there on defense, either. Certainly not grade A or anything but I'm not looking at the L's right now and putting it on him or Burks (and I'm not a big Burks fan, either).

The Knicks are going to take on the chin. They got hit with the injury bug. It happens. They just have to play .500 ball until everyone's back. I'm still eyeing Randle's return for the Detroit game at the end of the month. OG evaluation should be today or tomorrow. We could probably see him back maybe on the 8th or 14th for the West Coast trip.


no, he is. he definitely is.


Nobody but Knicks fans thinks Boj is a horrible defender

And it's always hilarious that some Knick fans think every player we get is suppose to be a 2 way player, like the NBA is flooded with those types, but will always make an exception for mitch and is non existing offense.
User avatar
Wildcat
RealGM
Posts: 11,304
And1: 1,532
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Astoria, NY
 

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1398 » by Wildcat » Thu Feb 29, 2024 6:31 pm

cgf wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
Wildcat wrote:
Just to add to that, I haven't looked at the statistics and going purely on the eye test, but Bojan isn't exactly a scrub out there on defense, either. Certainly not grade A or anything but I'm not looking at the L's right now and putting it on him or Burks (and I'm not a big Burks fan, either).

The Knicks are going to take on the chin. They got hit with the injury bug. It happens. They just have to play .500 ball until everyone's back. I'm still eyeing Randle's return for the Detroit game at the end of the month. OG evaluation should be today or tomorrow. We could probably see him back maybe on the 8th or 14th for the West Coast trip.


no, he is. he definitely is.


Yeah his metrics are almost impressively bad.


The team overall has been bad on D.
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 22,867
And1: 15,009
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1399 » by Fury » Thu Feb 29, 2024 6:34 pm

Did anyone mention Patty Mills?
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 28,556
And1: 10,024
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
Location: laser shield bitches

Re: Woj: Knicks trade for Alec Burks and Bojan Bogdanovich 

Post#1400 » by cgf » Thu Feb 29, 2024 8:51 pm

Wildcat wrote:
cgf wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
no, he is. he definitely is.


Yeah his metrics are almost impressively bad.


The team overall has been bad on D.


True, but it's been a lot worse with him on the court than without him...as was Detroit...
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!

Return to New York Knicks