tooler wrote:To be fair, Houston had to get aggressive because they don't have a draft pick. Even free agents are a bit of a crap shoot. They're fortunate that it all came together with good balance and defense. I'm surprised.
Also nba requires to invest money to get to cap's floor. Houston have 40% of salary tied into Vleet & Brooks.
Vleet's contract is so massive yet short on purpose, so they can move him after next season as massive $40M of expiring money, that allows them flexibility if/when they resign own players or go after star player.
People make fuss about FVV contract, when in reality, he makes pretty much same money as Fultz + Harris+ Ingles.
IF you line up FVV's production with their cumulative production, you get almost the same, but not split into 3 old (and) broken players, but one player in his prime. So FVV+ any vets minimum body equals more than what you get. Not to mention trading value of FVV as asset compared to zero value you can get from our 3 players who's only value is empty salary space as they expire.
We will again in May be in situation where NBA will require from us to use $40M of cap space. So we will either resign Fultz, Okeke, Goga, Kevon Harris OR find somebody else to dump that money onto.
Houston figured it's better to dump money onto good player ( FVV) than split it into several players that have no value.
There is one team in nba that might be in massive problems next year. Hornets. As Hayward expires, they will be in position where they will be required to fill near $60M of salary . So you can fully expect them to be dumping some 4 years $160M type of deal to Nick Claxston or to be swinging for Goga on $15 M a year or moves like that. Or they will just allow other team to unload massive contract and collect assets.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon