bwgood77 wrote:eagereyez wrote:The "draft for BPA regardless of fit" philosophy will take a serious hit if Colangelo ends up trading Okafor for Knight. Could have just taken Winslow or Hezonja instead of Okafor, and ended up with a better prospect than Knight. Then again, for all we know Hinkie would have taken Porzingis if ownership didn't interfere with the process.
Why not just Covington for Knight?
Did ownership really tell Hinkie not to draft Porzingis?
I don't understand why Okafor has such low value.
I know teams want to go fast, shoot 3s and have quick defenders, but you'd think some teams would be all over that elite post game.
I think RoCo for Knight is a solid trade. I'm just not high on Knight personally. Knight needs to play heavy role on offense to compensate his deficiency with defense, while higher role on offense leads him to be a inefficient player (low FG% and high TO%). But for RoCo, I'd consider it. RoCo has one of the best contract in the league and is one of the best longest (7'2" wingspan) two way wing.
Personally, I do think Hinkie preferred Okafor. The way we draft guys, we draft them not based on how well they can fit with the modern NBA. Given the players has tools to improve, we draft guys who is the most talented at that position. For the same reason we drafted Simmons over Ingram, despite Ingram being a much better shooter and better in challenging shots. Knowing Hinkie and the FO, they don't give an F about player agents. It's not like Jah wanted to play for us prior to the draft. Most big prospects knew that there is a clear logjam at our frontcourt.
I just feel like the team is more optimistic than most teams in player development. We were patient with MCW's shooting. We waited for Noel's ACL. We waited for Embiid's foot to heal. I think with Jah, the FO view him as a long mobile C who is good at challenging shots (and he actually is). I also think FO think that Jah can improve his rebounding, just like Noel's offense, Simmons' shooting and Embiid's foot.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.