76ciology wrote:marcush wrote:Mik317 wrote:
we are still in BPA territory. I'd be a little peeved if we reached for another guy because of fit with a guy who hasn't played yet.
If we are sitting at 4 and the other three guys are off the board...passing on Mudiay is a hard choice is all I am saying. Mario is the only remaining guy I'd take over Mudiay. And guess what the remaining PGs aren't exactly marksmen either.
I am just saying I don't agree with this growing sentiment that Mudiay isn't top 5...someone even said he isn't top 8..that is absurd
Agree to disagree then. In my uneducated opinion a PG who cant shoot and isn't uber athletic shouldn't be regarded in the BPA sphere. Herzonja and Porzingis both fit the athletic profile and have perfect form on their jumper. Also, wasn't my intention to suggest he was not top 8. I said 8 is fine but no to top 4, so in between is so, so for me.
Mudiay is BPA because he got attributes that weighs more heavily. Young, Athletic(athletic than most PGs, probably the lower echelon of Wall/Westbrook types), elite sized PG (comparable to Joe Johnson at SG), who can create his shot, run the PnR and attack the rim on offense. That matters over guys whose best attribute is a skillset that can be developed, shooting.
I'm still not high on Herzonja, I think he's going to have a tough time getting his shots off against the long athletic swingman defenders. I think Porzingis is right there with Mudiay, both have mysterious upside. But I have Mudiay because I think he's the safer prospect due to his size relative to guys in the NBA.
My issue with Mudiay is his lacks explosive speed. He just plays Jrue like, where he would use his great body control and physicality to maneuver around the paint.
You like Porzingis and Mudiay and not Hezonja? We are on different pages when it comes to this draft. Then again, those are the three we all have seen the least at the top of the draft, so it's not surprising we have differences of opinions.