Cutter wrote:I disagree. He could have used any number of methods to counter what saintescation posted without calling his post a lie. Are you now saying that the next post I disagree with I can just call the post a lie? "hey lilfishi, your post is just a bunch of lies." "Hey lilfishi, I'm going to refute the lies in your post one by one." Saying or implying someone is lying is made to escalate a situation, not de-escalate it. Shouldn't a mod de-escalate? I don't think I've ever heard you call someone's post a lie, and by extension implying the poster is a liar.
I have an issue with this. Calling my post genius doesn't mean you're calling me a genius. It only means that post, at that point in time, in that particular conversation was genius. Just as calling a post a lie, doesn't mean he's implying saintescation should be branded a liar, only his post in a vacuum is untruthful. Again, I'm haven't gone deep enough to validate either party's proof points, only that it's clear both party's have gone to significant effort in doing research to back up their's.
bondom called the post a lie because he believed it was, based on the information and background he has. I have no issues in a poster calling out a
post as a lie, if you can prove it is so. Could bondom have used another word other than lie? Sure, but to devalue his entire post because he used the word "lie" and then call him a troll (which is a direct personal attack, mind you) adds nothing to the conversation. If you have an issue with his post, then attack his points.
This isn't really the forum to be discussing whether bondom is right or wrong as this is going OT but I'm happy to take this offline and discuss through PM with you.