Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
- Stanford
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 53,571
- And1: 18,825
- Joined: Feb 07, 2005
- Location: Parts Unknown
-
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
I think you're right. Ultimately it's going to fail. I can't imagine we'll have 3 hours Raws this time next year. 3 hours of Raw per week, PLUS SD!, PLUS NXT, PLUS Superstars is just overexposing your talent.
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 19,223
- And1: 1,562
- Joined: Jun 26, 2001
-
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
Stanford wrote:I think you're right. Ultimately it's going to fail. I can't imagine we'll have 3 hours Raws this time next year. 3 hours of Raw per week, PLUS SD!, PLUS NXT, PLUS Superstars is just overexposing your talent.
And plus don't forget they have three hours pay per view every month to top of that.
Check out my blogs
http://nbaanalytical.blogspot.com/ <-------NBA Analytical
Listen to my podcast
https://anchor.fm/phillip93
http://nbaanalytical.blogspot.com/ <-------NBA Analytical
Listen to my podcast
https://anchor.fm/phillip93
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
- blazza18
- RealGM
- Posts: 56,376
- And1: 29,312
- Joined: Dec 02, 2010
-
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
Going to be awful. 2hrs is horrible atm but 3. Fark. Wont last long.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,316
- And1: 2,191
- Joined: Oct 10, 2011
-
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
Awful idea, I barley watch right now.

credit: TurboZone
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,487
- And1: 6
- Joined: Jul 04, 2010
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
wwe proves week after week that they can't even book 2 hours
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,282
- And1: 2,359
- Joined: Dec 04, 2011
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
Christophersp10 wrote:wwe proves week after week that they can't even book 2 hours
The 3 hour show last week was cool.
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
- Stanford
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 53,571
- And1: 18,825
- Joined: Feb 07, 2005
- Location: Parts Unknown
-
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
Christophersp10 wrote:wwe proves week after week that they can't even book 2 hours
Why do you even watch the show?
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
- jr lucosa
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 12,048
- And1: 1,151
- Joined: Jul 11, 2008
-
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
Personally I am not against the move. I understand the skeptisism but I'm willing to give it a shot. When they made the announcement I thought it was cool, let's see where WWE takes this. I think it would be a good idea to start establishing the tag team division again which they do seem to be doing. The extra hour could give us the assurance of quality matches in every division every week.
Now I could certainly see this going south. I would not be shocked at all to see 15 of the minutes go to commercials, 30 minutes of HHH and 15 scrap minutes for a job match. If this becomes the regular I see about no chance of this working.
Now I could certainly see this going south. I would not be shocked at all to see 15 of the minutes go to commercials, 30 minutes of HHH and 15 scrap minutes for a job match. If this becomes the regular I see about no chance of this working.
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,487
- And1: 6
- Joined: Jul 04, 2010
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
Stanford wrote:Christophersp10 wrote:wwe proves week after week that they can't even book 2 hours
Why do you even watch the show?
Deflecting at it's finest. I state the truth and you can't handle it.
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
- Stanford
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 53,571
- And1: 18,825
- Joined: Feb 07, 2005
- Location: Parts Unknown
-
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
Christophersp10 wrote:Deflecting at it's finest. I state the truth and you can't handle it.

viewtopic.php?f=273&t=1177258&start=285#p31850023
viewtopic.php?f=273&t=1177258&start=300#p31850101
viewtopic.php?f=273&t=1177258&start=300#p31850750
viewtopic.php?f=273&t=1185274#p32070997
viewtopic.php?f=273&t=1185274&start=15#p32119528
OK, buddy.
Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,597
- And1: 8,077
- Joined: Jan 13, 2005
- Location: TD Garden
-
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?
- blazza18
- RealGM
- Posts: 56,376
- And1: 29,312
- Joined: Dec 02, 2010
-
Re: Debate: Raw going 3 hours a good or bad thing?

Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.