2016 Royal Rumble

Moderators: Marcus, Stanford

Who will win the Royal Rumble?

Roman Reigns
5
24%
HHH
5
24%
Brock Lesnar
0
No votes
Bray Wyatt
8
38%
Dean Ambrose
1
5%
Other
2
10%
 
Total votes: 21

Prince12
RealGM
Posts: 12,327
And1: 2,750
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:
     

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#181 » by Prince12 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:01 am

Well, the boss decided he was due another run with the belt
@mkebucksaus just kicking off. Give it a follow!

https://twitter.com/mkebucksaus
User avatar
heatwillbeback
RealGM
Posts: 18,287
And1: 13,164
Joined: Jul 26, 2003
     

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#182 » by heatwillbeback » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:03 am

I think they put the belt on the wrong feud.

Bray and Lesnar needs a title. Roman and hhh does not.
Image
User avatar
Geddy
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 69,869
And1: 78,609
Joined: Nov 30, 2005
Location: Drinking an extra cole Sprite
 

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#183 » by Geddy » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:04 am

Hogan will come back to fight HHH for the title
Inevitable wrote:Geddy is a good mod actually
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,208
And1: 16,917
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#184 » by Stanford » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:06 am

Geddy wrote:Hogan will come back to fight HHH for the title


I don't believe we've seen the last of Flair in the ring.
User avatar
DJhitek
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,778
And1: 1,354
Joined: Jul 12, 2004
Location: Berto Center
       

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#185 » by DJhitek » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:06 am

Predictable ending really....but damn with Styles here to stay and a huge push for Ambrose I'm excited.
User avatar
detroitKG
RealGM
Posts: 13,235
And1: 5,509
Joined: Feb 24, 2011
Location: The Social Media Embassador
     

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#186 » by detroitKG » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:08 am

Bruh.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8FrpWIWj9o[/youtube]
Butch718
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 6,747
Joined: Mar 13, 2012
     

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#187 » by Butch718 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:11 am

This is exactly what's wrong with the product, they could have created themselves such a huge star if Ambrose won, instead they put over the 40 year old part timer, why create new stars when you can push reigns chasing the title down our throats. The crowd would have exploded if Ambrose won.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Spens1
RealGM
Posts: 13,865
And1: 3,878
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
     

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#188 » by Spens1 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:11 am

well that was pathetic, was hoping that Ambrose would win somehow (gimme dat good ol' Russo swerve over old man ego as champ)

and Bray getting eliminated by HHH, Bray needs to come out on raw and just murder him with the Wyatt family, also if they get Steph and Vince that would be great also.

apart from the rumble match (which was good until towards #25 onwards), the IC title was MOTN, Tag Team titles match was good and fast, divas title (SPACE MOUNTAIN AIN'T CLOSED DOWN YET WOOOOOOOOOOOO) and US title where decent matches

also that AJ styles debut, one day in the company, already the most over active wrestler
skbucks1985
RealGM
Posts: 14,698
And1: 1,903
Joined: Apr 29, 2003

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#189 » by skbucks1985 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:13 am

You guys are all wrong, that finish was BEST FOR BUSINESS.

Honestly, I didn't hate it. Would I have preferred something totally out of left field like AJ winning, sure. And maybe its because you could see this coming from a mile away as this has clearly been the direction they were probably going to go in. Reigns-HHH isn't my favorite WM main event, in fact I can't think of a WM main event I've been less interested in. But the match was I thought great in setting up at least 3 other likely WM matches. Brock-Wyatt is clearly happening, I'm guessing they'll do Ambrose-Jericho and either Owens-Zayn or Owens-Styles.
Mr.Raptorsingh
RealGM
Posts: 33,839
And1: 27,797
Joined: May 17, 2007
 

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#190 » by Mr.Raptorsingh » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:14 am

I wonder who they put in a program with Styles.

And how long is HHH going to have the title for anyway?
User avatar
detroitKG
RealGM
Posts: 13,235
And1: 5,509
Joined: Feb 24, 2011
Location: The Social Media Embassador
     

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#191 » by detroitKG » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:15 am

safi brings up a great option for the IC title at Mania...4 way? Styles Ambrose Zayn Owens??? That would be insane!
Prince12
RealGM
Posts: 12,327
And1: 2,750
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:
     

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#192 » by Prince12 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:23 am

Yeah, i think that four way is certainly on the cars. Seemed to tie up with the eliminations tonight.

AJ probably on par with Lesnar for biggest pop of the night but id have to actually put sasha at a close third. Crowd really erupted like i have not seen for a long long long time to a diva. Was pretty cool.

The match fizzled out at the end when it looked to predictable. First rumble in forever that had no nostalgic moments but some good story lines were progressed/started so I'm cool with it.
@mkebucksaus just kicking off. Give it a follow!

https://twitter.com/mkebucksaus
Spens1
RealGM
Posts: 13,865
And1: 3,878
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
     

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#193 » by Spens1 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:26 am

safi wrote:You guys are all wrong, that finish was BEST FOR BUSINESS.

Honestly, I didn't hate it. Would I have preferred something totally out of left field like AJ winning, sure. And maybe its because you could see this coming from a mile away as this has clearly been the direction they were probably going to go in. Reigns-HHH isn't my favorite WM main event, in fact I can't think of a WM main event I've been less interested in. But the match was I thought great in setting up at least 3 other likely WM matches. Brock-Wyatt is clearly happening, I'm guessing they'll do Ambrose-Jericho and either Owens-Zayn or Owens-Styles.


Reigns vs HHH in the main event of mania seems pretty bad for business if you ask me, that match wouldn't sell 80k into mania this year

i agree though, they did set up 3 or 4 clear matches, but thats the thing, everything in this company has become so calculated, soulless and predictable, why would the fans invest any energy and emotion in it when it seems they can't be bothered also
Spens1
RealGM
Posts: 13,865
And1: 3,878
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
     

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#194 » by Spens1 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:28 am

detroitKG wrote:safi brings up a great option for the IC title at Mania...4 way? Styles Ambrose Zayn Owens??? That would be insane!


that would be amazing, so many feuds in one match (well, basically Owens v everyone because Owens :lol: )
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,208
And1: 16,917
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#195 » by Stanford » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:30 am

Butch718 wrote:why create new stars when you can push reigns chasing the title down our throats.


Look; I wasn't thrilled with the ending, but Reigns chasing the title is creating a new star. You don't create stars in one match. It takes a sustained effort.
Butch718
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 6,747
Joined: Mar 13, 2012
     

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#196 » by Butch718 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:34 am

Except the crowd isn't fully 100 percent behind him and never will be.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
WRau1
RealGM
Posts: 11,925
And1: 5,144
Joined: Apr 30, 2005
Location: Milwaukee
     

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#197 » by WRau1 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:42 am

I liked the PPV didn't like the ending. HHH v Reigns doesn't need the title. Excited about the WM possibilities, though. Raw SHOULD be good tomorrow.
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
Spens1
RealGM
Posts: 13,865
And1: 3,878
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
     

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#198 » by Spens1 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:48 am

Stanford wrote:
Butch718 wrote:why create new stars when you can push reigns chasing the title down our throats.


Look; I wasn't thrilled with the ending, but Reigns chasing the title is creating a new star. You don't create stars in one match. It takes a sustained effort.


all well and good with the intention, but you could hear the crowd, they wanted nothing to do with roman

it was bad enough here, imagine how many times worse it would be at mania
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,208
And1: 16,917
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#199 » by Stanford » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:52 am

Sometimes they want nothing to do with Roman, sometimes they do. It's a work in progress. He's had a lot of moments when the crowd has gotten completely behind him.
skbucks1985
RealGM
Posts: 14,698
And1: 1,903
Joined: Apr 29, 2003

Re: 2016 Royal Rumble 

Post#200 » by skbucks1985 » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:54 am

Spens1 wrote:
safi wrote:You guys are all wrong, that finish was BEST FOR BUSINESS.

Honestly, I didn't hate it. Would I have preferred something totally out of left field like AJ winning, sure. And maybe its because you could see this coming from a mile away as this has clearly been the direction they were probably going to go in. Reigns-HHH isn't my favorite WM main event, in fact I can't think of a WM main event I've been less interested in. But the match was I thought great in setting up at least 3 other likely WM matches. Brock-Wyatt is clearly happening, I'm guessing they'll do Ambrose-Jericho and either Owens-Zayn or Owens-Styles.


Reigns vs HHH in the main event of mania seems pretty bad for business if you ask me, that match wouldn't sell 80k into mania this year

i agree though, they did set up 3 or 4 clear matches, but thats the thing, everything in this company has become so calculated, soulless and predictable, why would the fans invest any energy and emotion in it when it seems they can't be bothered also


Reigns-HHH is a pretty lackluster main event, I think anyone arguing otherwise is fooling themselves. But I think its a match they were forced into because of injuries and of the options they have, I think its one of the better ones.

I fundamentally disagree with the idea that predictable=bad. I'm not excited about HHH-Reigns because I'm not really a fan of either guy and the story they've told hasn't really appealed to me. I'm pretty excited about Ambrose-Jericho even though I figured that was probably the direction they were going after that 6-man tag all those months ago and I can probably give you a basic outline of how the feud will play out and culminate, so I see a high level of predictability there. But I'm a fan of both guys and I'm confident that they can create a story that appeals to me.

Return to Pro Wrestling