Butch718 wrote:I want to see it just to hear the nuclear heat from the “Cody Crybabies”. The Rock was right when he reenacted their behavior on Twitter on Pat’s show the other day.
I know I am in the minority, but I don’t care about Cody finishing the damn story.
heatwillbeback wrote:Related to my last post, I am beyond sick of these ridiculous title runs.
Stanford wrote:heatwillbeback wrote:Related to my last post, I am beyond sick of these ridiculous title runs.
Thats funny because by about 2002, everyone was beyond sick of short, flip-flopping title runs.
prolific passer wrote:Stanford wrote:heatwillbeback wrote:Related to my last post, I am beyond sick of these ridiculous title runs.
Thats funny because by about 2002, everyone was beyond sick of short, flip-flopping title runs.
Really? Because the ratings before that say otherwise.
heatwillbeback wrote:Related to my last post, I am beyond sick of these ridiculous title runs. Other guys need to hold belts. It’s like they are forgetting what made the Attitude Era so successful- there were at least 5 guys who could hold the belt at any time, and it could change any PPV, Raw.
Rollins needs to drop the belt. And obviously Reigns does as well.
prolific passer wrote:heatwillbeback wrote:Related to my last post, I am beyond sick of these ridiculous title runs. Other guys need to hold belts. It’s like they are forgetting what made the Attitude Era so successful- there were at least 5 guys who could hold the belt at any time, and it could change any PPV, Raw.
Rollins needs to drop the belt. And obviously Reigns does as well.
I agree with the long title runs. Also how come they haven't split up the tag team titles yet is weird.
Dominator83 wrote:Butch718 wrote:I want to see it just to hear the nuclear heat from the “Cody Crybabies”. The Rock was right when he reenacted their behavior on Twitter on Pat’s show the other day.
I know I am in the minority, but I don’t care about Cody finishing the damn story.
Me neither. It's wrestlemania 40. The Marquee needs to be Roman vs the Rock. Cody can finish his story at summerslam
Rich Rane wrote:prolific passer wrote:heatwillbeback wrote:Related to my last post, I am beyond sick of these ridiculous title runs. Other guys need to hold belts. It’s like they are forgetting what made the Attitude Era so successful- there were at least 5 guys who could hold the belt at any time, and it could change any PPV, Raw.
Rollins needs to drop the belt. And obviously Reigns does as well.
I agree with the long title runs. Also how come they haven't split up the tag team titles yet is weird.
When you have solid writing, the payoff is just gonna be much bigger whenever Roman, Seth, and Gunther drop the titles. Tag titles should've been split again around the time KO and Sami took them from Jimmy and Jey though. The division has plenty of teams and it's more difficult to write without the titles.Dominator83 wrote:Butch718 wrote:I want to see it just to hear the nuclear heat from the “Cody Crybabies”. The Rock was right when he reenacted their behavior on Twitter on Pat’s show the other day.
I know I am in the minority, but I don’t care about Cody finishing the damn story.
Me neither. It's wrestlemania 40. The Marquee needs to be Roman vs the Rock. Cody can finish his story at summerslam
The result for Rock vs Roman for the title was so utterly predictable, which is why everyone hates it. There's little chance Rock stays post-WrestleMania to defend the title. And if he did stay, what an absolute waste of taking the title from Roman by a part-timer. It should go to a full time wrestler.
Butch718 wrote:Predictable? Cody finishing the story is also predictable.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Texas Chuck wrote:title should have gone to Sammy. That was the best story this company had in over a decade. Doesn't matter that he's not a guy you want as the face of the company. He could have a short run and drop it, but look at Danielson and Kofi. Sometimes giving the people want they want is the right play.
I'm not in love with Cody getting the rub, but there simply isn't another viable option how they've boxed themselves in. But it has to happen, the Bloodline story is stale and full credit to Roman for finally getting himself over as this character, but he's clearly the next hollywood bound guy so send him on his way and start building some new main event stars.
heatwillbeback wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:title should have gone to Sammy. That was the best story this company had in over a decade. Doesn't matter that he's not a guy you want as the face of the company. He could have a short run and drop it, but look at Danielson and Kofi. Sometimes giving the people want they want is the right play.
I'm not in love with Cody getting the rub, but there simply isn't another viable option how they've boxed themselves in. But it has to happen, the Bloodline story is stale and full credit to Roman for finally getting himself over as this character, but he's clearly the next hollywood bound guy so send him on his way and start building some new main event stars.
I feel both Sammy and LA Knight have been hurt badly by those losses when they were at their peak.
I would be good with Sammy taking it off Drew if Drew wins it (and if he is the one facing Rollins, which I think he will be). WWE may want to wait for Punk, but I just want some damn title changes. I thought with Rollins getting the belt it would be a way to get deserving guys title runs, but that title has been held as well (although Rollins at least defended it regularly).
