ImageImage

Portland - 2016 Offseason

Moderators: DeBlazerRiddem, Moonbeam

Jsun947
Analyst
Posts: 3,626
And1: 450
Joined: Jan 02, 2007

Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1 » by Jsun947 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 3:50 am

Now that the deadline is over and we know what the roster looks like we have a more clear picture of what we'll have heading into this offseason.


UPDATED 7/1 FOR CURRENT PROJECTIONS WITH TURNER AT 70/4 (ASSUMING 4.5% RAISES)

Name 2016-17
Damian Lillard $24,381,225
Evan Turner $16,350,000
Al-Farouq Aminu $7,680,965
Ed Davis $6,666,667
C.J. McCollum $3,219,579
Noah Vonleh $2,751,360
Mason Plumlee $2,328,530
Anderson Varejao (Stretch) $1,984,005
Pat Connaughton $874,636
Luis Montero $874,636
Cliff Alexander $874,636

Meyers Leonard $7,689,700
Maurice Harkless $7,235,148
Allen Crabbe $2,725,003

2016/2017 Estimated Cap $94,000,000
Total With Cap Holds $85,636,090
Cap Space With Cap Holds $8,363,910
Total Without Cap Holds $67,986,239
Cap Space Without Cap Holds $26,013,761

Assuming there is no changes our depth chart and without slotting in our restricted free agents this is what our depth charge looks like.

Lillard/?/?
CJ/Connaughton/?
Aminu/Montero/?
Vonleh/?/Alexander
Plumlee/Davis/?

The biggest glaring need would be power forward. The free agency pool at that position looks like a pile of poop too. Whats your ideas on what we should do with Leonard, Harkless, Crabbe's cap hold, and who we should (realistically) chase in free agency?
User avatar
Fitz303
General Manager
Posts: 8,198
And1: 1,839
Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Location: Portland

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#2 » by Fitz303 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:04 am

I think Crabbe is definitely back. Other than that, I think everything is up in the air. A lot will depend on this stretch run
Masterfully
Starter
Posts: 2,295
And1: 1,435
Joined: Jun 04, 2015

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#3 » by Masterfully » Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:11 am

With all that cap space maybe we can absorb a bad contract and a late first round pick in 2019!
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,424
And1: 2,187
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#4 » by Norm2953 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:30 am

Likely Portland is not going to be a destination for next years FA class with the league
awash in cap space, I'd think NO might set the team up to be under the cap floor
again assuming Henderson and our UFA leave.
Jsun947
Analyst
Posts: 3,626
And1: 450
Joined: Jan 02, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#5 » by Jsun947 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 3:23 pm

If we are going to roll with Lillard/CJ we need a rim protecting C. I don't think that's up for debate. We also need a power forward and if we have a rim protecting C and that guy needs to be able to spread the floor so the lane doesn't get clogged. I'm also a firm believer that we need to use as much cap space as possible this offseason before McCollums extension will kick in the following year. At the very least we'll be accruing assets that can be used in the future.

I can't see this team being more competitive until we solve our PF problem. Ryan Anderson would be a good solution, particularly if we were able to obtain a better C in the mold of Dwight. I just don't like Dwight with his health issues. We would also need to spend in the neighborhood of $48,000,000 starting out to get them both.

Frankly due to age, health, reliability, and cost I would look at Leuer and Whiteside. If Olshey follows the same strategy and amounts he used with Aminu and Davis that would equate to a 4 year 40 million deal starting at $9,350,000 for Leuer. Whiteside would require the max, about $23,000,000 starting out.

If we don't keep the right to match Leonard or Harkless that leaves us about 10.5 million in cap space.

Depending on what Harkless is offered we could retain him. Depending what Crabbe gets offered we can keep him. Ideally it would be nice to add a defensive specialist that can defend and switch 1-3 without getting murdered, sorta like an Avery Bradley type. I just don't see one of those guys available though. To a smaller degree we need a back up point guard but given CJ and Lillard will play almost all of those minutes I'm not too worried about it.

It also leaves us with a big man problem. Whiteside, Plumlee, and Davis should not be played together, almost ever. Plumlee is so great in the pick and roll and he's cheap, and we have team control going forward. I think it would probably make sense to trade Ed Davis at that point if needed.

Depth and versitity is a great option to overcome lack of star talent, especially when you can stay flexible.

If this is our rotation I think we can challenge for the 4th spot in the West.

Lillard/CJ
CJ/Crabbe/Connaughton
Aminu/Harkless/Montero
Leuer/Davis/Vonleh
Whiteside/Plumlee/Davis
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,192
And1: 7,959
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#6 » by Wizenheimer » Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:56 pm

first off, I wouldn't assume that Portland will stretch Varajao's cap number. They will likely need the credit next season to get near the salary floor....unless of course Olshey unwisely gives big contract extensions to all three of Crabbe, Harkless, and Leonard. I'd also think that the front office might want to get that cap number off the books before a possible new CBA in 2017. Even if his cap number is stretched, it might be a 3 year stretch rather then a 5 year because only 1 year is guaranteed. But that doesn't make a significant difference.

second, Jon Leuer? I sure haven't seen enough from him to warrant any interest. If you go by the pre-draft numbers, Leuer is smaller then Plumlee; he was 1.25' shorter and has a 2.5" less standing reach. He's not a rim protector, that's for sure. Plumlee has blocked 56 shots in 1376 minutes this season alone...Leuer has blocked 57 shots in his 3077 minute career. If Portland is going after another big man this off-season (hopefully to replace Meyers), I think they can find better candidates then Leuer

Whiteside? even if the Blazers offered him a max deal, the chances of them signing him are very small; and I tend to agree with those saying that signing Whiteside to a max deal would be really high risk. On paper, he looks like a perfect C to plug into the Blazer lineup. But Miami doesn't seem to be very determined to keep him and Pat Riley sure doesn't seem like a fool

Crabbe will be interesting. With the league drowning in cap-space this summer, it's easy to imagine him getting some crazy offer. I would hope that Olshey has a cap on what he's willing to pay Crabbe and it isn't over 10-11 million/year. But with the reports that Olshey was willing to give Meyers a substantial deal last summer, I'm worried he's determined to re-sign 'his guys'.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

as far as free agents are concerned, which way are the Blazers going to go? Will they try to sign win-now players or guys who can 'grow' with the team? Will it only be bargain bin shopping again? Would Portland sign an older player on a shorter contract?
AllMyNeilOlshey
Junior
Posts: 370
And1: 42
Joined: Jun 28, 2012

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#7 » by AllMyNeilOlshey » Fri Feb 19, 2016 5:33 pm

So we don't want to pay Meyers a large amount of money but we should pay Jon Leuer 10 million a year? I understand you're trying to find realistic targets but Leuer is a older Meyers in my opinion and I believe stats back me up there.
Jsun947
Analyst
Posts: 3,626
And1: 450
Joined: Jan 02, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#8 » by Jsun947 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 5:48 pm

According to Woj today Portland is stretching Varejao and it will be 3.3 mil per year over three years as our cap hit. I'll adjust the numbers.

Leuer isn't a center, he's a power forward. Meyers isn't a power forward, he's a Center. They are opposites in that regard.

Leuer is sorta like Plumlee... If Plumlee was a little shorter, quicker, and had three point range. You can also say he's almost a 6'10 Plumlee with Meyers range and shooting.

He has a very good handle, makes quick, smart decisions, a willing passer, and a good three point shooter. I can see him working perfectly in Stott's system.

He's a guy you play with Plumlee, not instead of him.


This is a decent highlight video of him in a game. You can see how his shot keeps the defense honest and then what he's able to do when they close out on him

http://youtu.be/1tukMH1

I'm with you on Whiteside though. If you can't get him then you can't get him. He's a huge risk but I think it's a risk worth taking.

If we aren't going to bottom out to get a good draft pick, and you aren't going to get a big time free agent then the only way you're going to get a potential star caliber player is to get horrendously lucky or take a huge risk on a guy like Whiteside.

If we can't get Whiteside I'd even be for signing Leuer and resigning Leonard if it's a tradable contract. There are times in games where the two of them playing PF & C spacing the floor for Lillard & McCollum could be really valuable.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,192
And1: 7,959
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#9 » by Wizenheimer » Fri Feb 19, 2016 7:18 pm

Jsun947 wrote:According to Woj today Portland is stretching Varejao and it will be 3.3 mil per year over three years as our cap hit. I'll adjust the numbers.


ok then; maybe my reading of the CBA was correct in terms of it only being a 3 year stretch because only 1 year of Varajao's contract is guaranteed after this season. I'm skeptical of the hit being 3.3 million since his guaranteed salary is only 9.36 million, but that's probably quibbling about a pretty small number; the same is true between a 5 year and 3 year stretch

however, this stretch provision appears to be an automatic adjustment to salary payment once a player is waived. That's a new component in the current CBA. Maybe it's there so waived players can't spend it all quickly.

but as far as I can tell, Portland has the option to match the cap-hit to the stretch or take it all nest season. If that's true, I don't know when the deadline is for them to make that choice. But there might definitely be a benefit to taking it all next season

Leuer isn't a center, he's a power forward. Meyers isn't a power forward, he's a Center. They are opposites in that regard.

Leuer is sorta like Plumlee... If Plumlee was a little shorter, quicker, and had three point range. You can also say he's almost a 6'10 Plumlee with Meyers range and shooting.

He has a very good handle, makes quick, smart decisions, a willing passer, and a good three point shooter. I can see him working perfectly in Stott's system.

He's a guy you play with Plumlee, not instead of him.


This is a decent highlight video of him in a game. You can see how his shot keeps the defense honest and then what he's able to do when they close out on him

http://youtu.be/1tukMH1

I'm with you on Whiteside though. If you can't get him then you can't get him. He's a huge risk but I think it's a risk worth taking.

If we aren't going to bottom out to get a good draft pick, and you aren't going to get a big time free agent then the only way you're going to get a potential star caliber player is to get horrendously lucky or take a huge risk on a guy like Whiteside.

If we can't get Whiteside I'd even be for signing Leuer and resigning Leonard if it's a tradable contract. There are times in games where the two of them playing PF & C spacing the floor for Lillard & McCollum could be really valuable


well, if the Blazers are going for a win-now roster next season, there should be better PF options then Leuer. Start with Ryan Anderson. He can certainly stretch the floor. He'd definitely be more expensive though. Blazers could think about Al Horford but he'll be getting a lot of interest
BigLurch92
Analyst
Posts: 3,468
And1: 1,005
Joined: Jan 08, 2005
Location: Seattle
     

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#10 » by BigLurch92 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:57 pm

Try Terrence Jones at PF?. Maybe coming home to Portland could inspire him to put up serviceable numbers while Vonleh hopefully develops.
Jsun947
Analyst
Posts: 3,626
And1: 450
Joined: Jan 02, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#11 » by Jsun947 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:03 pm

Anderson would be a good get but a lot of the media guys like Duncan, Lowe, Woj predicting he's going to get 18 or 20+ a year.

I've always thought of Horford as more of a C in the modern NBA. He's one of those guys where if he's willing to consider our team then you make the offer and figure it out afterwards.

Who's the best 10 power forwards in free agency this year? The list is depressing lol.
Jsun947
Analyst
Posts: 3,626
And1: 450
Joined: Jan 02, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#12 » by Jsun947 » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:04 pm

BigLurch92 wrote:Try Terrence Jones at PF?. Maybe coming home to Portland could inspire him to put up serviceable numbers while Vonleh hopefully develops.


He's been soooo bad though... His defensive numbers are some of the worst in the NBA and he suddenly forgot how to shoot or rebound. He's not going to get a lot of offers and might have to take a one year deal to try and rehab his value.
User avatar
red_power
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,617
And1: 898
Joined: Feb 21, 2010
 

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#13 » by red_power » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:41 pm

TJones just mediocore at all. He can certainly finish around the rim, but can't properly do anything else on the floor. His health is a big question too.
Not good option for me.
"Fly forward despite the fog" (c) Kobe Bryant 1978-2020
Masterfully
Starter
Posts: 2,295
And1: 1,435
Joined: Jun 04, 2015

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#14 » by Masterfully » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:49 pm

Every free agent next summer falls into one of two categories for me:
1) 100% Unrealistic
2) Yawn
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 8,939
And1: 3,521
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#15 » by zzaj » Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:43 am

I think the Blazers should target late first/early 2nd 4 year College players, who could potentially come in and produce right away while still having a bit of ceiling or even perhaps some diamond in the rough potential.

These type of players will possibly contribute just as much as any of these FAs at a fraction of the cost. I am thinking Jeff Whithey types...

REALLY disappointing that Olshey didn't acquire any picks for this year, as I think this is exactly the time for young players to be added if you're looking at the projection of Lillard's "window".

In some ways next year could be really exciting. If Crabbe and Vonleh are with the team, they may be forced into MUCH larger roles by default..sorta make or break time.

Lillard/Roberts (?)
CJ/Crabbe
Crabbe/Aminu
Vonleh/Davis
Plumlee/Davis
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,025
And1: 2,349
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#16 » by DaVoiceMaster » Sat Feb 20, 2016 2:20 am

DAVID LEE!!!

Oops, forgot the green font!
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
Joshumitsu
Senior
Posts: 662
And1: 56
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#17 » by Joshumitsu » Sat Feb 20, 2016 6:03 am

I'd like to to sign Barnes. Weakens the Warriors and adds Barnes to a similar team as the one he won a ring in. Plus, he can guard PF's.
GreenRiddler
General Manager
Posts: 9,747
And1: 1,444
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Blazer fan from Toronto
     

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#18 » by GreenRiddler » Sat Feb 20, 2016 6:17 am

The thing about Barnes is, he is really Crabbe in disguise and that is doubly expensive. I'd rather keep Crabbe.
Jsun947
Analyst
Posts: 3,626
And1: 450
Joined: Jan 02, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#19 » by Jsun947 » Sat Feb 20, 2016 7:12 am

Plus there is the part where Barnes is restricted and they just match it
User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 12,177
And1: 4,253
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#20 » by JasonStern » Sat Feb 20, 2016 2:04 pm

Jsun947 wrote:According to Woj today Portland is stretching Varejao and it will be 3.3 mil per year over three years as our cap hit. I'll adjust the numbers.


looks like we might have just priced ourselves out of the Steve Blake sweepstakes...
I don't have a cool avatar image because Dame came home.

"Hate all you want. The Bucks will trade Doc Rivers for me."
- Chauncey Billups

Return to Portland Trail Blazers