OriAr wrote:TheSuzerain wrote:How would we currently rate the quality of high major college?
I think the portal/NIL/Covid Year has arguably increased the level of play somewhat significantly via talent consolidation in the top conferences and keeping guys in school longer.
I always struggle gauging against the Euro domestic leagues though. Plus the G-League is kind of in a weird place.
The thing about the NCAA is that the bottom is straight up garbage, but the good teams are actually very good.
I'd say a top 25 NCAA team is probably good enough to compete in the Euroleague and not get totally embarrassed, and as someone who watches a fair bit of Euroleague I am pretty sure Zach Edey would be the best player there on day 1. And Knecht would be a huge Euroleague superstar as well.
If they are in a top program and performing well, I don't think they are much worse if any than good Euroleague players.
If they aren't in a ranked program then they are probably not that good though and wouldn't see much playing time though.
IMO, I think that Euro Domestic Leagues are a significant step up from NCAA ball. I figure 90-95% of NCAA players do not have enough natural talent to play pro anywhere, ever... Never mind them having their games developed enough when they are 20 or so years old. College ballers could compete with foreign pro’s back in the 1970’s (and earlier), but the US started sending professional teams to the Olympics in 1992, and there was good reason for that...
So let’s do a little research.
The SEC is a decent conference, and let's look at 13/14. (I picked 13/14 as that gives the players 10 years to develop their game and get onto a pro team somewhere.)
Here’s a link to the SEC page on sports reference for 2013/14.
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/conferences/sec/men/2014.html
That will give us who played on each team.
The realgm page for the SEC in 13/14 is here,
https://basketball.realgm.com/ncaa/conferences/Southeastern-Conference/8/stats/2014/Averages/Qualified/All/Season/All/points/desc/1/
You can drill down to an individual team using the team selection box in the header at the top of the page. Then you can click through to the individual players. REALGM only show the players who had a career beyond college basketball. Unfortunately, they do show stats for players who got 3 games in the Mexican LNBP and then got cut. So, you have to look into the player's actual games played to assess whether the player had enough ability to actually play pro (that league, that season, of course). I propose setting a floor of sticking for 20 pro games, as having enough ability to play pro.
Then we need to go through the SEC rosters, looking the players up and figure out :
1) How many players played for that SEC team in that year.
2) Which players had enough talent to ever play in a real pro league (ie. At some point said player played 20 games with a pro team somewhere)?
3) Which players had enough talent to get into a such a league in the 14/15 season (ie, in theory, was good enough to play in a pro league in 13/14 as well...)
Then we add up the totals for 1), 2) and 3), and figure out the percentages.
Obviously the calculating the same percentages for any euro domestic league (eg for example, The ABA), will result in 100%...
There were 14 teams in the SEC that year, and in alphabetical order, Alabama comes first. I'm going to do that roster in the next post...
I hope that other posters will be willing to chip in and do a team themselves... Heck, if we get enough enthusiasm, we could do the research for the top 16 seeds in the big dance that year.
EDIT: Currently this project does not count service in the G-league, NBA Summer League, nor NBA Pre-Season as completing the real pro league requirement.