The-Power wrote:JMAC3 wrote:The-Power wrote:Please name the users who are active in the thread and do not accept the possibility that he's not good. If you can't then please stop framing any pushback against the incessant bumping of this thread after every bad game as ‘reasonable me versus Scoot fanboys’ because that's not at all what's happening here.
I don't really feel the need to call people out by name, not really my style for the most part.
I think you generalize and misrepresent people's viewpoints so that you can call ‘them’ out, and when asked to actually back up your claim you make excuses (‘not my style’) instead of admitting that you made it up and can't back it up now. Also, not wanting to prematurely declare Scoot a bust or not a good player is very different from not acknowledging that there is a possibility that he ends up a bust or not a good player. Obvious, no?
And even though it shouldn't really have any bearing, I'll point out that I have been a champion of Miller before the draft and voiced my concerns about Scoot (even though I still had him in that third tier of players and therefore fairly high). So I'm certainly not in here defending Scoot because I refuse to be wrong. I'm simply calling out bad, inconsistent or dishonest takes when I see them.
I really didn't feel like derailing the thread but seems like you are really begging for it.
This is like 5% Miller vs Scoot at this point. It is more about Scoot just being awful and looking at him bigger picture as a #3 pick and against his fellow rookie piers.
When numbers at the rim are posted and the responses are let's look at a different site that looks at inside of 3 feet instead of 5 feet and then provide no context to where that actually ranks among the league then yes that is making excuses....he is awful on both but hey 1 of them is higher than other so see he isn't bad lol
When you post shooting numbers and the excuses are... lets only look at a certain segment of the games he played to make his shooting look better... that is making excuses..
When defensive numbers are posted for all rookies and his are in the bottom of the bottom... the claim defense doesn't matter for young players is excuse making...
When stats are shown he is high turnover and the excuses are his teammates suck, he has nobody to set good screens, its his coaches fault...
When 5 stats are shown that Scoot is bad player and the returning argument is well PLAYER X is also bad in 1 out 5 of those stats, so is he also bad?... is the type of arguments that are floated back.
I can promise you I am not over here just making up examples, these are real life responses in this thread instead of just saying " You know what, I might have been too high on Scoot".... it is just continually trying to poke holes in the very real evidence that exists that he is a pretty large disappointment.