Thoughts on Kevin Love in the pros?

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831

Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 51,046
And1: 19,727
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Thoughts on Kevin Love in the pros? 

Post#1 » by Doctor MJ » Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:09 am

Lovin him as a Bruin fan. What do y'all experts think?
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 97,718
And1: 25,194
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#2 » by moocow007 » Sat Jan 26, 2008 7:07 am

I think his lack of footspeed and overall athleticism will hurt him. How much depends on how well he can make everything else he brings to the table work and how hard he plays. I think Love is one of the most technically sound players in college and seems to have both a great understanding of the game as well as a fighters spirit. I think he can definitely be an player in the NBA but especially with the athletic beasts in the NBA nowadays (compared to say 15-20 years ago) that he's not going to be a star. To which, it will be very interesting to see how someone who probably has always been used to being one of the best if not the best player on the court adjusts to no longer being that. And adjusting to the NBA (and even to college) is the biggest hurdle for someone who is not going to be able to simply outrun and outjump his opponent. What people usually like to do is to try to compare Love to someone that is playing or has played in the NBA but I think he may be somewhat unique in that respect. He's not Chris Webber (as some have compared him to) if for no other reason that he doesn't come close to Webbers size and athleticism. He may be closer to a Brad Miller though Miller is both taller and slightly quicker than Love.
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

 

Post#3 » by FNQ » Sat Jan 26, 2008 7:18 am

Get the kid a trainer... and he's money.

I'd take him in the lottery this year.
Canomad
Banned User
Posts: 19,723
And1: 69
Joined: May 17, 2007
Location: The City Of Steel

 

Post#4 » by Canomad » Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:19 am

if could shed 20 pounds and tone up a little he will be a very good pro.
suckfish
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,533
And1: 1,273
Joined: Jun 12, 2007

 

Post#5 » by suckfish » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:48 pm

Similar views to what Moocow has. His post seems pretty spot IMO.

I love him as a player, his awesome technical skills and fundamentals are great to see, it's quite refreshing. His lack of athletic ability in my eyes will probably prevent him from becoming a star player. He doesn't have great size, so he cannot make up for his lack of athletics in that way, so I really think this limits him to being just a solid player.

He's certainly a unique talent, and I think he will have a solid NBA future assuming he stays healthy.
UGA Hayes
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,787
And1: 16,285
Joined: Jan 05, 2004
Location: real gm

 

Post#6 » by UGA Hayes » Sat Jan 26, 2008 5:04 pm

Watching Glen "Big Baby" Davis this year has made me much more optimistic about Love's chances, assuming he reshapes his body the way Davis did. Offensive rebounders don't grow on trees and I expect a guy who is good enough to do it at UCLA will be able to do it in the pros.
hard49
Banned User
Posts: 939
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 28, 2002

 

Post#7 » by hard49 » Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:48 pm

UGA Hayes wrote:Watching Glen "Big Baby" Davis this year has made me much more optimistic about Love's chances, assuming he reshapes his body the way Davis did. Offensive rebounders don't grow on trees and I expect a guy who is good enough to do it at UCLA will be able to do it in the pros.


Bingo!

He will make it as a very good rotation player. A role like McDyess had on Detroit. Quality 3rd big on a high level team. Capable starter.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

 

Post#8 » by revprodeji » Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:31 pm

An interesting thing could be the 6'10 talk. If he is a legit 6'10 maybe he could project as a 5 not a 4, which would help him. He would need to muscle the 5's but I think he has a better chance at that then getting the foot speed for the 4's. If anything, if he can get next to a 4 that scores he could be a good player at the 5.

of course, that is assuming he is 6'10 and not 6'9 or 6'8
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Village Idiot
General Manager
Posts: 9,275
And1: 2,016
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
   

 

Post#9 » by Village Idiot » Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:32 pm

In my opinion he's like Zach Randolph with a brain and a heart. In other words, he should be just fine if you can live with a player with obvious limitations.
"There are no right answers to wrong questions." - Ursula K. Le Guin
Jerryd Bayless
Banned User
Posts: 975
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 25, 2008

 

Post#10 » by Jerryd Bayless » Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:18 pm

A better David Lee with an inside game.
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

 

Post#11 » by horaceworthy » Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:44 pm

If he loses weight, tones up the body and manages to get more a little more athletic when he does so, things could be interesting.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
User avatar
randomhero423
Head Coach
Posts: 7,013
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 09, 2006
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Contact:

 

Post#12 » by randomhero423 » Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:56 pm

a poor man's brad miller.
My High School Basketball Articles:
www.nyhoops.com

My Sports Blog
myrandomsportsblog.blogspot.com
User avatar
TMACFORMVP
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,947
And1: 161
Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Location: 9th Seed

 

Post#13 » by TMACFORMVP » Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:24 am

I wanted to start a similar thread (or exactly the same one haha), because I saw his stock around 15-22 and thought he'd be a potential player the Rockets would be interested in.

Seems like he's a good rebounder and passer from the high post; all signs pointing to him being a good fit in an Adelman system right?
User avatar
randomhero423
Head Coach
Posts: 7,013
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 09, 2006
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Contact:

 

Post#14 » by randomhero423 » Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:51 am

he can also shoot the rock a lil bit as well.
My High School Basketball Articles:
www.nyhoops.com

My Sports Blog
myrandomsportsblog.blogspot.com
Jemini80
Banned User
Posts: 6,437
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 29, 2007

 

Post#15 » by Jemini80 » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:09 am

if he gets in great shape, he could be a poor man's boozer.

That is assuming when he gets in better shape his quickness and athleticism increase as well.

He will be the SOD if he goes outside of the top 10.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 51,046
And1: 19,727
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

 

Post#16 » by Doctor MJ » Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:18 am

randomhero423 wrote:a poor man's brad miller.


Y'know Love's arguably better now as a freshman than Miller was as a senior right?
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

 

Post#17 » by DanTown8587 » Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:30 am

The thing is, Love is not 6-10, probably more 6-8. With that said, if the guy stayed two more years at UCLA, he could develop a better outside shot (a must for him) and get a better basketball IQ, and finally tone that muscle. If he comes out now, its a mistake. He reminds me a lot of Elton Brand with a better outside game, not quite the inside game. Wide body, can feel real well and is a good offensive player. I think Love stays at least one more year because he won't get that lottery guarantee and doesn't need the money.
...
Jemini80
Banned User
Posts: 6,437
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 29, 2007

 

Post#18 » by Jemini80 » Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:44 am

i saw UCLA's coach on Jim Rome is Burning a couple of weeks ago and he said he highly doubts Love will be back next year...
User avatar
$*DIPSET BOI*$
Senior
Posts: 598
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 03, 2007
Location: The Savior...

 

Post#19 » by $*DIPSET BOI*$ » Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:58 am

Jerryd Bayless wrote:A better David Lee with an inside game.
Not as atheletic but I can see him taking the same role as Lee. My comparison would be Sean May, and his career could end up the same if he doesn't watch his weight. Didn't he have some knee problems in the past and had to have surgery? I would take him as a mid-first, any GM taking him over Blake Griffin is a fool.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 93,401
And1: 24,600
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#20 » by hermes » Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:55 pm

he could be very good
lose some weight
even better

Return to NBA Draft