I.D. wrote:garbagnani wrote:It is Bosh that is the Liability on Defense. Bargs can cover his man, he just cant help (at all). If we pair bargs with a center that is good help defender that can rebound and blocks shots (10ppg is enough) bargs will not be a liability on defense, he will cover his man, and box out (things he does well).
This is truly getting out of hand. Wow!
I'm not even gonna argue basketball anymore in regards to this. But from a logic based school of argumentation I don't understand how 4 years of inconsistent to frustrating result from Bargnani holds any relevance in a debate about the merits of him as a player versus those of 5 all-star years from Chris Bosh. You don't have to like Bosh, or his game, but how can anyone logically, throw his actual results under the bus and at the same time refer to scattered isolated incidences in Bargnani's career as an actual method of argumentation? It's ambitious at best, martrydom for anyone trying to win a debate (or suicide take your pick) but it's also a bit insulting to your counterpart. I would think. I find these kinds of arguments insulting anyway. That's not the best route to take in this crusade.
Just to be clear, I am in no way entrenched in my stance against this whole "Bargnani era" and movement, my current opinion is what it is, but I do realise as a Raptors fan that I hope it can succeed and given a compelling argument I'll play on that hope. But none of these arguments approach that.
And by the by, how does Dagger get away with passively calling everyone who attacks his theories an idiot or moron? You wouldn't do that in a face to face conversation so show some class and avoid it when behind a computer monitor.
all that I said is that Bosh is a horrible defender. Bosh and Bargs are both horrible team defenders, Bargs is a better man defender than Bosh, thats all. I dont know how i possibly insulted you, or anyone.....















