Post#574 » by Courtside » Fri May 7, 2010 11:42 pm
Rhett, that's accurate for this season, but over their careers there his been a slightly larger disparity. Jump shots in previous seasons recorded on 82games (didn't count 05-06 since he only played 50 minutes)
06-07:
Amare: 45%
Chris: 59%
07-08:
Amare: 55%
Chris: 58%
08-09:
Amare: 55%
Chris: 64%
Skeebs has been all over the base with silly comments and is equally as biased against Chris as the flossers are for him. I wonder whose siht disturbing double account he is?
That said - the question about whether Houston would be better of with Amare is a good one when you look at the bigger picture. There's not a lot to differentiate the two and it really comes down to how you think they would fit, what they'll cost you (both salary + assets) and finally, how you project they'll hold up physically.
Amare has had a history of injury that exceeds that of Chris, but since his surgery in 06 has been pretty reliable. Chris has never missed as many games in a season as Amare has in his two worst, but it seems to be increasing every season and seems to happen with regularity after the All Star break. The brace is a concern as he seems to be losing quicks and lift, while Amare is like a pogo stick a lot of the time.
Amare could be had for less, both from an outright signing standpoint and from a trade asset standpoint - so the question is does Chris really give you that much more or fit that much better, considering the higher cost attached? Houston must really like what their talent evaluators are projecting with him in the line up. I do think their roster and playing style is a better fit for Chris than we are. Conversely, I think Amare is a better fit for the Raptors roster and playing style.