Bulls insider: Turk for Dalembert, Bosh's 1st choice Miami?

Dr Positivity · Post #1 » by **Dr Positivity** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:39 pm

This was posted by an admin. Apparantley there's a poster named JOHN who has the admin dougthonus on facebook. JOHN was on vacation and couldn't get internet access, but phoned a friend and told him to send this message to doug on facebook. So I would put more credibility into it than some random poster coming up with it.

dougthonus wrote:So a friend of the poster JOHN from here, messaged me on facebook saying that JOHN had some interesting inside information that he wanted to share with the board, but he couldn't because he was on vacation and didn't really have internet access. Anyway, here are the complete contents of what he sent me via facebook for your perusal.

John's friend wrote:ok,he called me this morning and told me that bulls are in discussions with orlando,we will send deng for pietrus and gortat,thats the offer and one other irrelevant one is turkoglu for dalembert swap,also john heard that amare's 1st choice is miami,bosh's 1st choice is maimi too,boozer's is either new york or nets and lebron its 50-50 between us and staying to cleveland

edit update
John's friend wrote:just read the comments,someone wondered if the offer was from bulls,john said was from orlando

viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1021538&start=0

I would be all over Turk for Dalembert, unfortunately I think it would require our #13 pick.

Would this sequence of events be possible?:

- Turk says he likes Sac, Noc says Tor is fine. Petrie and Colangelo start talking about a Nocioni Turkoglu deal, possibly involving #13. Sac is ok with Turk for Noc or Turk/#13 or Noc or w/e, but Colangelo isn't.
- They call up Philly to talk about involving Dalembert in the deal. Colangelo is fine with the deal if it involves Dalembert instead of Nocioni.
- Sac Philly deal goes through, Dalembert inclusion doesn't because Sac wants to see how the draft goes first. They want to make sure Cousins falls to 5 to be their new C and maybe who's there at 13. So they agree to do the deal later

Hadis · Post #2 » by **Hadis** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:41 pm

Man! Id drive turkoglu myself out of toronto, i wouldnt even take a tip. dalembert is a Center we could definetly use, and then finally shift Bargs to PF

N1QUE24 · Post #3 » by **N1QUE24** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:42 pm

YES! YES! YES!

RINSE · Post #4 » by **RINSE** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:42 pm

im on that like flies on ****

Hadis · Post #5 » by **Hadis** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:43 pm

I think i creamed myself a bit when i heard that.

Randle McMurphy · Post #6 » by **Randle McMurphy** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:43 pm

We seriously could get a player of value for Turkoglu?

Let's hope.

basketball royalty · Post #7 » by **basketball royalty** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:44 pm

IDK how valid this is. I mean how can you know if LeBron is 50/50 between CLE and CHI? Just how?

As for Hedo for Dally, I am fine with anything for Hedo so an expiring shot blocking C is a big yes.

Post #8 » by **LittleOzzy** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:45 pm

The only thing that seems fishy to me is how does a guy with no internet access suddenly receive "insider" information?

Why would someone suddenly phone him in some hotel overseas just to let him know about a rumour?

novi13 · Post #9 » by **novi13** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:45 pm

Too bad Miami's first choice doesn't seem to be Bosh.

Trilogy · Post #10 » by **Trilogy** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:45 pm

That trade would be immensely good for us.

phailing101 · Post #11 » by **phailing101** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:46 pm

If it involves the #13 pick, please tell Philly to stuff it.

NH · Post #12 » by NH » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:46 pm

I call BS.. Isn't this Dalembert's last year of his contract? If so, no way Kings will just give up an expiring for a guy owed 4 more years.. next please.

Post #13 » by **Rhettmatic** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:46 pm

LittleOzzy wrote:The only thing that seems fishy to me is how does a guy with no internet access suddenly receive "insider" information?

Why would someone suddenly phone him in some hotel overseas just to let him know about a rumour?

Haha, good point, hadn't considered that.

I'm feeling a bit of Insider fatigue lately. I don't doubt that there are posters here who are privy to valuable information, but we sure have a lot of people lately claiming to know about future trades.

Buzzer Beat · Post #14 » by **Buzzer Beat** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:46 pm

bring the canadian boy home eh~!!!

ak06ma · Post #15 » by **ak06ma** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:47 pm

I was looking at the Sixers board yesterday and apparently the Kings have been trying to get Dalembert for a year now.

Brinbe · Post #16 » by **Brinbe** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:47 pm

Not sure about the validity of this, but I'd take it in a second, if it was just straight up sans pick.

wajr · Post #17 » by **wajr** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:48 pm

I think it's BS. Sac has been trying to get Daly for over a year. Now they finally get him and they're going to move him for TUrk??? Doubt it!

wtcantfw · Post #18 » by **wtcantfw** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:49 pm

wajr wrote:I think it's BS. Sac has been trying to get Daly for over a year. Now they finally get him and they're going to move him for TUrk??? Doubt it!

Well, if Demarcus Cousins falls in their lap, why not?

Rude Boy 1 · Post #19 » by **Rude Boy 1** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:51 pm

NH wrote:I call BS.. Isn't this Dalembert's last year of his contract? If so, no way Kings will just give up an expiring for a guy owed 4 more years.. next please.

agreed but if true it has to be considered one of the great heists! Right up there with Amir and Weems for Roko and CDelfino

-Blitz- · Post #20 » by **-Blitz-** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:51 pm

not happening because of what this guy said^...and also because the kings arnt that stupid even if the pick is involved their getting ripped off big time.