I always thought of Sheed as far worse a rebounder than he should have been given his skills but didn't get overly worked up about it becuase he was so good on D (when younger) and his teams always seemed to be good rebounding teams.1. According to the Elias Sports Bureau, Sheed has the lowest career per-48-minute rebounding average of anyone 6-foot-11 or taller who played 1,000-plus games (9.8).
9.8 rebounds per 48 is the lowest of anyone 6 foot 11 or taller (who played 1000 games) Andrea Bargnani's current per 48 average after 310 games?
7.9! Nearly 2 full rebounds worse than a guy who is termed the worst 6 foot 11 plus rebounder in NBA HISTORY.
BARGS BEST rebounding year was last year..his per 48 minue rate? 8.5!
His CAREER BEST ..his BEST rebounding year is a full rebound worse than the WORST rebounding 6 foot 11 plus player in NBA history.
There you have it folks..we are witnessing history in the making! To underatnd how truly bad it really is this quote hit home..if this is true about Sheed what would we say about a guy who is worse?
Sheed doesn't rebound as much as debound. "Lazy" isn't a strong enough word. He always seems to be standing in the wrong spot. He constantly forgets to box out. His hops are long gone, so balls routinely bounce over his head to opposing players. When matched against a hustler like Anderson Varejao, it's like watching a golden retriever fight off a Rottweiler.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/st ... ortCat=nba
DEBOUNDING..I like that






















