WaltFrazier wrote:maternal85 wrote:WaltFrazier wrote:I'm no student of recent Knicks history but my understanding is they've been trying to build a solid foundation of young players under the current regime? Not like the days of buying stars like Carmelo.
Then why trade Quick ? The OG move is if you need a final piece. Just how we did the Marc Gasol trade. They're just throwing anything at the wall hoping it sticks.
I read somebody say it's easier to replace what IQ did than to get what OG provides. Now they still do need to go acquire a guard or bench scorer to replace Quickley's scoring, no doubt.
I assume they don't see OG as the final piece, but a necessary piece to keep building. And get their final piece, or bigger star, in summer.
I don't think the order in which the 2019 Raps were built is set in stone as the only way. In another timeline Masai could have got Gasol first then Kawhi as the final piece.
No one can say the Knicks are on the right path for sure, but it's fair to say they have a better plan than just throwing stuff at the wall.
They needed the glue that holds it together. OG is the binder, the connective tissue on defense, that allows for a more efficient offence and the freedom to just add a big time scorer (or whatever) because they dont have to focus so much on how great they are on defense too. So instead of having to mask RJ's defensive woes, they have the luxury of just adding the final jewel to their crown, theoretically. That's why a guy like OG is wanted on most teams in the NBA, because of his blue collar, POA defense, he makes it so much easier for his scorers. They don't have to waste as much time on defense (which they do worse, anyways) and can focus on their scoring strengths. So in that sense it allows each player to focus on their respective strengths, thus giving them max efficiency per role and position.