ImageImageImageImageImage

PG: F Us

Moderators: HiJiNX, niQ, Morris_Shatford, DG88, Reeko, lebron stopper, 7 Footer, Duffman100

Chandan
RealGM
Posts: 17,302
And1: 21,144
Joined: Nov 23, 2017
 

Re: PG: F Us 

Post#101 » by Chandan » Wed Mar 27, 2024 6:40 pm

TimeForChange wrote:there were maybe 5 people on here high on scottie. everyone else was pro-suggs and mobley.

this revisionist history is hilarious :lol:


I was pretty meh on suggs leading up to the draft. Thought his game reminds me of Geroge Hill and that he lacked burst.
Glad he found his place as a defensive impact player though.
Image
DelAbbot
RealGM
Posts: 12,712
And1: 19,008
Joined: May 22, 2019
   

Re: PG: F Us 

Post#102 » by DelAbbot » Wed Mar 27, 2024 7:03 pm

Chandan wrote:
TimeForChange wrote:there were maybe 5 people on here high on scottie. everyone else was pro-suggs and mobley.

this revisionist history is hilarious :lol:


I was pretty meh on suggs leading up to the draft. Thought his game reminds me of Geroge Hill and that he lacked burst.
Glad he found his place as a defensive impact player though.


George Hill was an impact player - enough that Indiana traded a young Kawhi for
Chandan
RealGM
Posts: 17,302
And1: 21,144
Joined: Nov 23, 2017
 

Re: PG: F Us 

Post#103 » by Chandan » Wed Mar 27, 2024 7:15 pm

DelAbbot wrote:
Chandan wrote:
TimeForChange wrote:there were maybe 5 people on here high on scottie. everyone else was pro-suggs and mobley.

this revisionist history is hilarious :lol:


I was pretty meh on suggs leading up to the draft. Thought his game reminds me of Geroge Hill and that he lacked burst.
Glad he found his place as a defensive impact player though.


George Hill was an impact player - enough that Indiana traded a young Kawhi for


yeah but you aim higher than George Hill with a high lottery pick. Getting Hill isnt bad on average but with these opportunities you swing for the fence everytime.
Image

Return to Toronto Raptors