What's more important: winning or entertainment?
Moderators: HiJiNX, niQ, Morris_Shatford, DG88, Reeko, lebron stopper, 7 Footer, Duffman100
What's more important: winning or entertainment?
- Troubadour
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,202
- And1: 8,192
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
- Location: Toronto
What's more important: winning or entertainment?
I was having this conversation with my teacher the other day (he's a Raptors fan).
He was saying that he'd rather have a team like Phoenix:
- Win a ton of regular season games
- Go one or two rounds in the playoffs
- Most entertaining team in the league (up-tempo)
As opposed to a Spurs type model:
- Win a lot of regular season games
- Win championships
- Painful to watch (grind-it-out half court)
Which would you prefer?
He was saying that he'd rather have a team like Phoenix:
- Win a ton of regular season games
- Go one or two rounds in the playoffs
- Most entertaining team in the league (up-tempo)
As opposed to a Spurs type model:
- Win a lot of regular season games
- Win championships
- Painful to watch (grind-it-out half court)
Which would you prefer?
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
- ZeriousLy
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,167
- And1: 775
- Joined: Feb 02, 2009
- Location: North York
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
you can only lose for so long...
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
- HighOctane
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,086
- And1: 363
- Joined: Nov 02, 2006
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
Entertaining Winning
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
- Troubadour
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,202
- And1: 8,192
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
- Location: Toronto
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
HighOctane wrote:Entertaining Winning
That's nearly impossible to get. The best example that comes to mind are the Laker teams of the 80s. Players like Magic don't grow on trees.
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,355
- And1: 585
- Joined: Aug 05, 2008
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
Troubadour wrote:HighOctane wrote:Entertaining Winning
That's nearly impossible to get. The best example that comes to mind are the Laker teams of the 80s. Players like Magic don't grow on trees.
THats because you take winnign as winning a championship ... winning also includes having good teams win 50 games like Utah and Dallas and the Suns ....
Winning is entertaining ..... and the spurs are not boring, people need to watch there games more often.
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
- hsb
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,678
- And1: 15,858
- Joined: Nov 19, 2006
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
I think Spurs fans found it more entertaining to win against Phoenix than Phoenix fans got from just being in the playoffs. Just a hunch.
I'll take the model that produces longer periods of entertainment.
I'll take the model that produces longer periods of entertainment.
"I definitely knew he traveled, but I didn't know they were going to call it. That was one of them situations in which a great player made a move...and they called the call. And I was like, 'Oh, man, there is a God.'
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
- Hendrix
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,030
- And1: 3,662
- Joined: May 30, 2007
- Location: London, Ontario
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
I think I could get behiind a team like the old Pistons more so then a team like the Suns. I find a team that will shut you down and play great team ball to be entertaining myself, and I think a team full of gritty defenders would do well with the Toronto fan base that like's to see effort.
oak2455 wrote:Do understand English???
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,791
- And1: 27,767
- Joined: May 17, 2007
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
To me, winning is important....what was so great about the Pheonix Suns is that they won and they were entertaining.
It is extremely hard to do what the Spurs have done...in that you need a great coach (Popovich), you need a Hall-of-Famer (Tim Duncan), and need a couple of other all-stars, one of which is selfless (Manu Ginobili)...they are entertaining b/c they win...and they systematically beat you to a pulp.
But, there's something intriguing to me about the Pheonix-model...the fact that it can inflate the level of performance of so many players, once it gets perfected...one of these days that style could very well win the championship.
It is extremely hard to do what the Spurs have done...in that you need a great coach (Popovich), you need a Hall-of-Famer (Tim Duncan), and need a couple of other all-stars, one of which is selfless (Manu Ginobili)...they are entertaining b/c they win...and they systematically beat you to a pulp.
But, there's something intriguing to me about the Pheonix-model...the fact that it can inflate the level of performance of so many players, once it gets perfected...one of these days that style could very well win the championship.
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
- Troubadour
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,202
- And1: 8,192
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
- Location: Toronto
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
I guess it's all about taste, but my favourite thing to watch is a team just light it up. There's nothing more beautiful than the swish of a basketball.
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
- Muhammad_Ali
- Starter
- Posts: 2,233
- And1: 607
- Joined: Apr 07, 2008
- Location: Cloud 9
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
The playoffs are all about grind it out so I'll go with winning!
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
- ForeveRaptorFan
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,692
- And1: 11
- Joined: Aug 14, 2008
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
Winning = Entertainment.
Following Bargnani's Progress since entering the League: Bargnani, Ill Mago, Barney, Bustnani, Bust and a Nani, Beastnani, Beardnani, Killer B...
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,138
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 04, 2009
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
Anyone ever think that winning is entertaining?
What makes the Spurs a boring team for casual fans is how fundamental and disciplined an approach they take. And also every year, except this one, they are a top defensive team which doesn't take stupid gambles. They have a great coaching staff and a group of extremely talented players who want to win, instead of make more highlight reels. For people who appreciate their amazingly high technical ability they're an great team to watch. So are the Celtics. They run plays smoothly and very rarely do they panic and attempt bad passes or shots. That's something I could never say for the Raptors. Ever watch them run a pick and roll? It's painful. I'd much rather have a clone of the Spurs than the Suns. They may be entertaining for a while, but everyone grows tired of knowing they can never beat the more defensively superior squads.
The Spurs could have been a team like the Suns. Duncan, while a great post player, always got up and down the court quite well for a guy his size. Tony Parker is one of the quickest players around and Ginobli has never had a problem with playing an attacking role on offense. They just choose to focus on winning rather than pleasing more casual fans. That's why they'll always be one of my favorite teams.
What makes the Spurs a boring team for casual fans is how fundamental and disciplined an approach they take. And also every year, except this one, they are a top defensive team which doesn't take stupid gambles. They have a great coaching staff and a group of extremely talented players who want to win, instead of make more highlight reels. For people who appreciate their amazingly high technical ability they're an great team to watch. So are the Celtics. They run plays smoothly and very rarely do they panic and attempt bad passes or shots. That's something I could never say for the Raptors. Ever watch them run a pick and roll? It's painful. I'd much rather have a clone of the Spurs than the Suns. They may be entertaining for a while, but everyone grows tired of knowing they can never beat the more defensively superior squads.
The Spurs could have been a team like the Suns. Duncan, while a great post player, always got up and down the court quite well for a guy his size. Tony Parker is one of the quickest players around and Ginobli has never had a problem with playing an attacking role on offense. They just choose to focus on winning rather than pleasing more casual fans. That's why they'll always be one of my favorite teams.
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
- Troubadour
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,202
- And1: 8,192
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
- Location: Toronto
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
I wouldn't say I'm a "casual" fan; however, I prefer watching the Suns of old. High-scoring games are always more fun to watch.
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,355
- And1: 585
- Joined: Aug 05, 2008
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
just23 wrote:Anyone ever think that winning is entertaining?
What makes the Spurs a boring team for casual fans is how fundamental and disciplined an approach they take. And also every year, except this one, they are a top defensive team which doesn't take stupid gambles. They have a great coaching staff and a group of extremely talented players who want to win, instead of make more highlight reels. For people who appreciate their amazingly high technical ability they're an great team to watch. So are the Celtics. They run plays smoothly and very rarely do they panic and attempt bad passes or shots. That's something I could never say for the Raptors. Ever watch them run a pick and roll? It's painful. I'd much rather have a clone of the Spurs than the Suns. They may be entertaining for a while, but everyone grows tired of knowing they can never beat the more defensively superior squads.
The Spurs could have been a team like the Suns. Duncan, while a great post player, always got up and down the court quite well for a guy his size. Tony Parker is one of the quickest players around and Ginobli has never had a problem with playing an attacking role on offense. They just choose to focus on winning rather than pleasing more casual fans. That's why they'll always be one of my favorite teams.
The Spurs are only boring because thats what people percieve them us. The media and everyone has given them that perception but Manu and TP are two of the most flashiest guys to watch ...
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
- KingstonRaptors
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,568
- And1: 57
- Joined: Feb 26, 2008
- Location: Toronto, ON
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
timdunkit wrote:
The Spurs are only boring because thats what people percieve them us. The media and everyone has given them that perception but Manu and TP are two of the most flashiest guys to watch ...
I totally agree. Parker and Manu are the best/entertaining back court duo to watch. It's unfortunate Manu is out for the rest of the year.
Credit to triplemke23 for the sig.
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 820
- And1: 290
- Joined: Aug 12, 2008
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
Winning is Entertaining!
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,355
- And1: 585
- Joined: Aug 05, 2008
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
KingstonRaptors wrote:timdunkit wrote:
The Spurs are only boring because thats what people percieve them us. The media and everyone has given them that perception but Manu and TP are two of the most flashiest guys to watch ...
I totally agree. Parker and Manu are the best/entertaining back court duo to watch. It's unfortunate Manu is out for the rest of the year.
Tottaly ... TP is always cutting and doing things that will leave you in awe in the lane atleast 3-5 times a game ... besides how can a Spurs game ever be boring when eva longoria is in the stands
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,740
- And1: 3,129
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
San Antonio is actually pretty exciting.
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
- AB_21
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,535
- And1: 23
- Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
A fun time is fun.
Nothing beats a championship team.
Nothing beats a championship team.
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 977
- And1: 341
- Joined: Mar 14, 2005
Re: What's more important: winning or entertainment?
this is a tough one, I think winning should trump all in all cases, however, I would not be happy if we turned into the new jersey devils and set a trend in basketball where boring play becomes popular. they really messed the nhl up, theres like 4 or 5 teams now that play that trap style in hockey and it is annoying as hell