Game 63: Utah Jazz (28-34) vs Chicago Bulls (29-32)

Moderators: FJS, Inigo Montoya

User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
Posts: 16,006
And1: 7,465
Joined: May 31, 2012

Game 63: Utah Jazz (28-34) vs Chicago Bulls (29-32) 

Post#1 » by Inigo Montoya » Wed Mar 6, 2024 10:23 am

A lot of players are listed as OUT for the Jazz so this could get ugly.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Image
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?

The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
User avatar
FJS
Senior Mod - Jazz
Senior Mod - Jazz
Posts: 18,627
And1: 2,064
Joined: Sep 19, 2002
Location: Barcelona, Spain
   

Re: Game 63: Utah Jazz (28-34) vs Chicago Bulls (29-32) 

Post#2 » by FJS » Wed Mar 6, 2024 3:31 pm

We can only lose it.
Image
red4hf
Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
Posts: 10,534
And1: 981
Joined: Jul 04, 2002

Re: Game 63: Utah Jazz (28-34) vs Chicago Bulls (29-32) 

Post#3 » by red4hf » Wed Mar 6, 2024 7:49 pm

Half the team is out...... Clarkson might get 50 tonight....... Shots that is........
User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
Posts: 16,006
And1: 7,465
Joined: May 31, 2012

Re: Game 63: Utah Jazz (28-34) vs Chicago Bulls (29-32) 

Post#4 » by Inigo Montoya » Wed Mar 6, 2024 7:56 pm

This is the Sensei's coming out game, I can sense it.

I'll see myself out.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Image
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?

The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
Posts: 16,006
And1: 7,465
Joined: May 31, 2012

Re: Game 63: Utah Jazz (28-34) vs Chicago Bulls (29-32) 

Post#5 » by Inigo Montoya » Thu Mar 7, 2024 11:59 am

1. That was a fun game. The Jazz played better than I expected.

2. Collins, Sexton and the Sensei were good. Collins really fought hard for those boards.

3. The Sensei looked good. 12 rebounds were unexpected. That's the first really good game we've seen from him and hopefully this performance will earn him more minutes.

4. Sucks that now that the Jazz are tanking there are nights like this where the only really relevant young player who plays is the Sensei. Kessler, George and Hendricks all out with injuries.

5. Too bad that last shot didn't go in. That's the second time Sexton is getting a great look for a corner 3 to win the game and it ends up in a miss. Better luck next time.

6. Overall, can't complain. The Jazz played well and this game receives the Montoya seal of approval for a quality loss.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Image
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?

The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
User avatar
FJS
Senior Mod - Jazz
Senior Mod - Jazz
Posts: 18,627
And1: 2,064
Joined: Sep 19, 2002
Location: Barcelona, Spain
   

Re: Game 63: Utah Jazz (28-34) vs Chicago Bulls (29-32) 

Post#6 » by FJS » Thu Mar 7, 2024 4:03 pm

Brice is shooting really well since he has quality minutes, much better than other rookies. Who knows, maybe he is the next steal. He has to improve his body (doesn't look athletic at all) but he looks more polished than Hendricks and with a better shot than Keyonte (His shot looks beautiful but he misses a lot)
Image

Return to Utah Jazz